|
|
Like the idea? |
Yes |
|
51% |
[ 28 ] |
No |
|
9% |
[ 5 ] |
It's not that simple |
|
38% |
[ 21 ] |
|
Total Votes : 54 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:06 pm
|
|
|
|
Felmino JadeEye Pretty much, I think colorists should have a minimum requirement of slots to take and either a higher cap or no cap at all (I'm not sure if there is even a cap?) if they want to nab another couple or not. :3 We already have this - minimum is 3 breedings, colorists are allowed to do more if they wish. ^_^Moxxiie :: Pardon me if this isn't exactly on topic, but maybe a small solution would be to give a time between breeding wins to the owner and not the Soq...sort of how the customs are done, but with maybe just one month in between? The major problem with breedings is the "it takes two to tango" nature of them - because two customers are involved generally and not just one, shutting down someone's odds as soon as they win means that all their breeding partners are unable to enter their couples. We've actually considered lowering the limit and rejected it because of this.
*hugs* no worries dear, it's good on paper but not in practice. wink
The majority of the turnover time is due to edits - more and more heavily edited Soquili, and breedings between two heavy edits resulting in very detailed offspring that can take many hours apiece. Unedited breedings take a quarter or less of the time a heavily edited breeding does.
I knew they had a minimum...just didn't know if they had a cap. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:41 pm
|
|
|
|
I don't know that more breeding slots are the answer, but I would definitely like to see more like Ririka did, with the Low Luck for a year slots. That would, I think, significantly cut down on the feeling that the same people were winning month after month.
I do understand, like the others, that there are a lot of people entering for just a few slots. I also sympathize with the colorists on not wanting to burn out. That said, I -also- sympathize with people who try and try to win slots and don't, while the same people seem to win if not every time, then pretty often.
I mean, consider the fact that there quite a few people who have 20+ attempts, while there are other people who sport sigs where they have two or three or more baskets at a time, from different breedings. Yes, some of those may be gifts from other people, but many are not. That points to an imbalance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:06 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|