|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:46 am
Honestly, why fight over this stuff? :3
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:04 am
Nespin Fernagon A definite maybe. While a god might exist, I rather doubt that it's the sort of god that any particular religion imagined. This.
Although personally I don't really believe a god exists.
The invisible tea kettle may exist too, but I doubt it's the sort of tea kettle I'm imagining.
xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:03 am
I think he does, and when it comes to these things it's really only my opinion that matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:52 am
yeh, if you're calling him the FSM...
but in all seriousness, I'm not sure. Maybe, maybe not. If so, definitely nothing really by the standards of any current religions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:36 am
Gods like in the religions? No.
An omnipotent being? Maybe.
Voted therefor: No.
Found this quote (that I'd like to share with you guys) on one of my Gaian friend's profile few years ago:
God
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
- Epicurus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:43 am
i say no because yall have no proof plus im shamen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:56 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:17 pm
In matters pertaining to proving the existence of a god, we must ask what the most likely explanation is: natural or supernatural? Supernatural explanations cannot be examined by science and cannot be falsified. If a natural explanation exists, it is much more likely than a supernatural one. That's why I favor evolution over creationism.
I've gotta say, I agree with Cleo on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:20 pm
Hidden Arc Honestly, why fight over this stuff? :3 I don't think anyone in here is fighting about it, and this is the discussion forum.
Personally, I'm interested in what exactly it is that causes people to believe (or not); as it can't really be proved either way, I'd like to know what other factors influence people's faith, beyond the obvious factors like the beliefs of people they know, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:23 pm
My personal reasoning? I don't believe in anything supernatural, and the way I see it, all spirituality is just a subcategory of supernaturalism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:35 pm
Phoenixious Gods like in the religions? No.
An omnipotent being? Maybe.
Voted therefor: No.
Found this quote (that I'd like to share with you guys) on one of my Gaian friend's profile few years ago:
God
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
- Epicurus. It's not that he's unable. He chooses not to. He chose to give us free will neutral (and by the way, that would be a yes.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:52 pm
Sub-Par Man Phoenixious Gods like in the religions? No.
An omnipotent being? Maybe.
Voted therefor: No.
Found this quote (that I'd like to share with you guys) on one of my Gaian friend's profile few years ago:
God
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
- Epicurus. It's not that he's unable. He chooses not to. He chose to give us free will neutral (and by the way, that would be a yes.) There ya go. XD Then he's not willing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:53 pm
Foam-Dome Sub-Par Man Phoenixious Gods like in the religions? No.
An omnipotent being? Maybe.
Voted therefor: No.
Found this quote (that I'd like to share with you guys) on one of my Gaian friend's profile few years ago:
God
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
- Epicurus. It's not that he's unable. He chooses not to. He chose to give us free will neutral (and by the way, that would be a yes.) There ya go. XD Then he's not willing. Exactly. So her chain of reasons that God isn't actually God is untrue. And it's not that he's malevolent either. He chooses to let us choose how to live our lives. Would you rather be a puppet with no choice?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
