|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:57 am
Nikolita Eruresto Yeah, come to think of it, I had Sex Ed too. It just wasn't very educational, from what I remember. At least the second round, in high school, wasn't. I don't remember learning much in high school either. I remember learning a bit about STDs and the like, but not much else. There was another class called Family Studies that was basically sex ed, family planning, pregnancy and puberty info (etc), but it wasn't mandatory. I just took it because I thought it'd be easy and fun, and it was. 95%. xd Easy A! Yeah, ironically, my private religious middle school had much better sex ed than my public high school, though that was due to Bush's emphasis on (read: requirement of) abstinence-only sex ed.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:32 pm
No comment on abstinence-only sex ed. scream Especially when framed in a religious/moral context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:43 pm
Nikolita No comment on abstinence-only sex ed. scream Especially when framed in a religious/moral context. No comment really is the only thing a sensible person can say about that isn't it? I mean, teaching people to fear sex is asinine. Luckily I only had to deal with that once in my life but it is absurd as a lesson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:22 pm
Sauvie Nikolita No comment on abstinence-only sex ed. scream Especially when framed in a religious/moral context. No comment really is the only thing a sensible person can say about that isn't it? I mean, teaching people to fear sex is asinine. Luckily I only had to deal with that once in my life but it is absurd as a lesson. Agreed. It should be presented as an option, but not as a mandate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
