|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 4:45 pm
i.....that's......I think that is the most disgusting thing i have ever heard.....*twitches at the thought of it* it's just plain horrible...... gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 1:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 4:00 pm
...but if they really love each other it should't matter...right?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:25 pm
it depends i mean love is love right it would be pretty hyprocritical for me to say its wrong and nasty but at certain times like in fanfiction it can get really hot like draco and lucius that is just :fans herself: gawd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:04 pm
Personally, I think it's really, really gross. I'm thinking of on the board of 'discusting'. If it's like sister/sister, brother/brother, sister/brother...it makes me want to vomit.
However, I can see when it's like 4th cousins or something, who didn't even know they were cousins. Anything beyond that it just...no.
I suppose I can be classified as hypocritical, seeing as how me being gay, and a lot of people call that 'wrong' and 'discusting'. I suppose it's just an opinion. True, love is love...and if I saw people who were incest, I wouldn't treat them any differently...it just grosses me out.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:32 pm
Dko The only problem I really have with it is there is a chance for birth defects. Even if not in there own children it might show up down the line. So as long as they decide not to have them Im cool with it. Its nothing I would do my self but I try to be open about most things. umm.. there's only really a .04% increase in the likelihood of birth defects than any normal non related couple would have when having kids. Most relatives that have kids together have perfectly normal kids and the non related people have all the defects....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:35 pm
Penguin513 Heartshaped Lullaby Incest means where family members love each other...like the old thought of cousins marrying being a thing from the south.
Anyways, what do you think of it? Actually, incest is when two blood-related family members have sexual intercourse, which is not only WRONG, but very dangerous because any offspring produced by such a union would be deformed mentally, emotionally, or physically. do way more research hon.... that rumor started before genetic research was even an idea. and american puritans started it. we are pretty much the only counrty with and huge moral issue against family members having sex with each other as long as it's not forced. We're the only place that sits around making laws against it. And people tend to twist the definition of incest. The whole moral issue supposedly came from the bible. And the bible is very clear on its definition of incest. i'll post it for you guys in a sec.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:52 pm
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:58 pm
It also goes on to forbid homosexuality.... so if you have a problem with incest, you might as well hate yourself otherwise you're just another mindless hypocrite who the bible sentenced to hell. Incest as you can see is defined by culture. Our is much too strict and based on mostly myth. The genetic problems only occur in sparsely populated placed where years of inbreeding occur. one kid with even your mom or dad is just as likely as anyone else's kid to have something wrong with it. It's very complicated. You and a parent could have tons of perfectly healthy kids and you and the furthest from related person could have mutilated, diseased babies. As long as the inbreeding doesn't continue, you're ok. if you have a kid with a relative, hope your kids don't go for the same idea and most of the time they don't just like having gay or stupid parents doesn't always mean the kid will be gay or stupid. Don't be prejudiced.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|