|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:30 am
As long as someone doesn't commit a crime on a child then there's no problem at all. Also, child pornography should not be viewed because it encourages child pornography to be made.
I'm pretty much the textbook definitely of a sadist, if people could be disliked for their thoughts I'd be pretty ********. It's the actions that matter, not what people enjoy thinking about. You can rub your gender specific parts to the thought of children all day and night, just leave any actual children out of it.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:36 am
Daffodil the Destroyer 
It's kind of a nebulous subject for me. I'll try to stay readable. XD
My first reaction is to look at it from a psychological/biological perspective. We are typically sexually attracted to certain features that denote fertility and health, like large breasts, symmetrical faces, muscles, body hair, and large hips, to name a few. Most of these features are decidedly adult - they indicate that the individual is sexually mature and able to reproduce. And we all know (right?) that the main instinctual goal of any animal species is for each individual to make sure that his or her genes continue on in the world. Offspring each have half of the same genes, and other relatives have portions of the same DNA as well, hence the reasoning for families helping each other out in tough times.
But someone who is only attracted to sexually immature individuals is not likely to have any opportunity for procreation, so this brings to mind the question of whether this person has some sort of mental illness or genetic mutation. From here, though, this opens the gate for similar thoughts concerning homosexual individuals. It has been proposed that, since homosexual behaviour has been observed in many different species, perhaps it exists as a check on overpopulation. A certain percentage of homosexual individuals in any population seems to be pretty common, so that gives some amount of credence to this idea. If homosexuality could be a population control mechanism, could ***** be one as well? Statistically, we may never be able to determine if ***** exist in similar percentages, since it is so taboo to come out as a *****.
I wonder, also, if perhaps ***** is an instinct found in certain individuals who have genetic mutations which would prove harmful to potential offspring.
All of this really does have a point... the essential question we always come to when discussing ***** is whether ***** is an actual sexuality or a mental illness. Research into the questions I discussed above might help determine the answer to this problem.
I don't really know what my opinion is about the questions posed in the OP; it's a subject that I go round in circles with whenever it's brought up. My personal experience tells me that it may indeed be possible for child-adult encounters to be remembered fondly and perhaps even be healthy. I was never sexually abused as a child, nor was I exposed to graphic sexuality on tv or movies, but I do remember always being a rather sexually minded child; I never acted on my curiosities but they were very present. I think that in a case like this, certain child-adult relationships could possibly be okay.
This is a very interesting action, didn't think I'd hear someone promoting any form of "certain child-adult relationships" that aren't strictly platonic. I'm not knocking your opinion, just didn't expect it. I would also like to note that ***** has also been observed in animals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
