|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:46 pm
I read that the fifth movie wouldn't come out until 2007. Maybe it's June 2007?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:41 am
It IS always possible that they DID film them right after the other, like how they did LotR all at the same time.
I hope they dont replace any of them, they're hella hot... crying
I will cry...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:44 pm
Potter351 Lola-chan dranzenphoenixstrike ...uh...I don't think so. o+o;;; Also, I heard that Daniel Radcliffe isn't doing OotP. He is doing OotP. I'm more worried about Tom Felton... He just turned 18...not to worry it happens alot he will probably stay on and a good example is on back to the future the main character marty well the person i cant remember his name was alot older than 18 like in his 30s i think Micheal J Fox. Duh.
They CAN'T replace the characters. That'd ruin the movies for like, ALL the older fans. The children probably won't care, but anyone my age or older will probably spazm. We all know Dan is a HORRIBLE actor and we're always saying they should get better actors, but you know it would ruin everything if they changed the main characters.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:22 pm
KitsuneTsuki It IS always possible that they DID film them right after the other, like how they did LotR all at the same time. I hope they dont replace any of them, they're hella hot... crying I will cry... I dont think they would do that for harry potter because there exposed to be long term. Harrys hair is different and ron and hermione are different in each and it wouldnt make it look practical to have them look almost the same during the movies.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:24 pm
Potter351 KitsuneTsuki It IS always possible that they DID film them right after the other, like how they did LotR all at the same time. I hope they dont replace any of them, they're hella hot... crying I will cry... I dont think they would do that for harry potter because there exposed to be long term. Harrys hair is different and ron and hermione are different in each and it wouldnt make it look practical to have them look almost the same during the movies. That is the reason why they did the LotR movies all at once. So they wouldn't have an issue with age. With Harry Potter, they're doing it in order so they DO get the growth factor. Doing one movie right after another verses doing it a couple months later wouldn't make a difference.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:44 am
Oh snaps. Potter351 KitsuneTsuki It IS always possible that they DID film them right after the other, like how they did LotR all at the same time. I hope they dont replace any of them, they're hella hot... crying I will cry... I dont think they would do that for harry potter because there exposed to be long term. Harrys hair is different and ron and hermione are different in each and it wouldnt make it look practical to have them look almost the same during the movies. That is the reason why they did the LotR movies all at once. So they wouldn't have an issue with age. With Harry Potter, they're doing it in order so they DO get the growth factor. Doing one movie right after another verses doing it a couple months later wouldn't make a difference.Um sorry to burst your bubble but in the first movie hes 11 right and then in the second hes 12 right and in the 3 hes 13 right and in the 4 hes 14 right. Well it should be easy now that the age factor is so needed. See if they did it next to each other then they would have harry looking like a baby in the 3rd movie.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 9:33 pm
Potter351 Oh snaps. Potter351 KitsuneTsuki It IS always possible that they DID film them right after the other, like how they did LotR all at the same time. I hope they dont replace any of them, they're hella hot... crying I will cry... I dont think they would do that for harry potter because there exposed to be long term. Harrys hair is different and ron and hermione are different in each and it wouldnt make it look practical to have them look almost the same during the movies. That is the reason why they did the LotR movies all at once. So they wouldn't have an issue with age. With Harry Potter, they're doing it in order so they DO get the growth factor. Doing one movie right after another verses doing it a couple months later wouldn't make a difference.Um sorry to burst your bubble but in the first movie hes 11 right and then in the second hes 12 right and in the 3 hes 13 right and in the 4 hes 14 right. Well it should be easy now that the age factor is so needed. See if they did it next to each other then they would have harry looking like a baby in the 3rd movie. ha that would have been funny, but without a doubt they will replace all the characters that we know and love but its going to happen no matter what so I think we might have t deal with it
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 11:39 pm
Potter351 Oh snaps. Potter351 KitsuneTsuki It IS always possible that they DID film them right after the other, like how they did LotR all at the same time. I hope they dont replace any of them, they're hella hot... crying I will cry... I dont think they would do that for harry potter because there exposed to be long term. Harrys hair is different and ron and hermione are different in each and it wouldnt make it look practical to have them look almost the same during the movies. That is the reason why they did the LotR movies all at once. So they wouldn't have an issue with age. With Harry Potter, they're doing it in order so they DO get the growth factor. Doing one movie right after another verses doing it a couple months later wouldn't make a difference.Um sorry to burst your bubble but in the first movie hes 11 right and then in the second hes 12 right and in the 3 hes 13 right and in the 4 hes 14 right. Well it should be easy now that the age factor is so needed. See if they did it next to each other then they would have harry looking like a baby in the 3rd movie. ...
I don't think you understood my post. O_o
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:29 am
Oh snaps. Potter351 Oh snaps. Potter351 KitsuneTsuki It IS always possible that they DID film them right after the other, like how they did LotR all at the same time. I hope they dont replace any of them, they're hella hot... crying I will cry... I dont think they would do that for harry potter because there exposed to be long term. Harrys hair is different and ron and hermione are different in each and it wouldnt make it look practical to have them look almost the same during the movies. That is the reason why they did the LotR movies all at once. So they wouldn't have an issue with age. With Harry Potter, they're doing it in order so they DO get the growth factor. Doing one movie right after another verses doing it a couple months later wouldn't make a difference.Um sorry to burst your bubble but in the first movie hes 11 right and then in the second hes 12 right and in the 3 hes 13 right and in the 4 hes 14 right. Well it should be easy now that the age factor is so needed. See if they did it next to each other then they would have harry looking like a baby in the 3rd movie. ...
I don't think you understood my post. O_ooh crap. Sorry about that i thought you were saying something different i was thinking of my grandma at the time.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:45 am
They wouldn't make near as much money if they replaced Dan, Rupert, and Emma. We're as attached to them as we are Harry,Ron, and Hermione.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 8:38 pm
Order of the Phoenix is scheduled to be released in 2007 and is currently in pre-production. Emma, Dan, and Rupert are all going to be in it.
I have this from a reliable internet site and will work on getting the link as soon as possible.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:09 pm
chibi_chan I read that the fifth movie wouldn't come out until 2007. Maybe it's June 2007? Same here, I think they're putting off the movie because the last book is supposed to come out next year. (I hope) And as far as the actors are concerned, I only heard that Emma is the only one that is not 100% committed to finish the series.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:22 pm
I heard that she's so attached to playing Hermione that she cried when she learned she might not be doing it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Well, if they do change any of the actors/actresses I will be sad. I think they did well on screen and I do agree that it would be hard too find someone to look exactly like them. Also, many fans love Dan, Emma, and Rupert and it will also sadden their hearts.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:25 pm
Oh snaps. dranzenphoenixstrike ...uh...I don't think so. o+o;;; Also, I heard that Daniel Radcliffe isn't doing OotP. He has too. He's the main character. You can't just up and replace the main character. They did with Dumbledore. Though, I suppose that's different because they had to.... crying WHAT? scream Emma can't just not play Hermione!!!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|