|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 6:48 pm
Heres how it breaks down, starting with dumbledore.
Soo, dumbledore is just chillin with the elder wand right?
Then draco is all DISARM YO.
So now draco has the allegience.
The draco is all "I can't do it!"
So snape killes dumbledore.
ZOOM FAST FORWARD YO.
So, harry gets captured and at malfoy manor disarms draco, WINNING dracos wands allegiance. THUS ALSO WINNING THE ELDER WANDS ALLEGIENCE.
But oh no, voldy has taken the elder wand from the tomb and it's just not working for him, and him being the idiot that he is kills snape.
The ONLY reason harry won, was because the elder wand would not kill it's master.
Snape never touched the wand.
After the battle harry repairs his wand and puts the elder wand back in dumbledores tomb.
ANY MORE QUESTIONS?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:30 pm
Yesh, fear, you are correct!
And Snape didn't ever have the wand, and he was never its owner.
*cough* Join Dueling Club at the Haven *cough*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:09 pm
I believe that in the end it was Dumbledore that killed himself or more specifically his temptations. We already know that Dumbledore was dying because of the curse from the ring and that he had about a year left, so you could say that Voldemort's curse killed him. However Snape did cast the actually killing blow, so technically you could say that he was the one to kill physically kill him. All Draco did was disarm Dumbledore, who had already planned this, so he does not count. The reason that I say Dumbledore's temptations killed him is that if he had not given into the temptation to use the ring (more specifically the stone in it) to revive his family which cause him to activate the curse. In the end you may be able to say that physically Snape killed him but it was his own temptations that was truly his demise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
