|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:44 am
I can beat your Blaziken with Luiga's aeroblast. Luiga was incredibaly powerful. Not only are it's flying and psyhic abilites good agianst blaziken's fighting, but it can also learn ground and water attacks. rofl
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:33 pm
I've had a Lv 50 Blaziken endure a SURF attack from an equivalent level Kyogre, survive, and then turn around to beat the Kyogre into submission.
Plus, there's a good chance that he'll survive Aeroblast (high Sp. Def, plus high HP), and then Mirror Move Lugia, blasting it with it's ownattack.
Blaziken > Everything Else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:44 pm
hmmm
Blaziken=blaziken then...
What we need is a water ghostie... None the less...
A gengar to use Hypnosis, and then dreameater, or a 1hit KO...
Or my personal favorite...
Kingler same level as Blaziken... Have it use a move, or you use item to boost its Accuracy ALl the way then use its Crab hammer...blammo instant death
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:09 am
WRONG!!
Blaziken+X-Attack+Double Kick= One KO'd Kingler.
And Hypnosis+Dream Eater is not reliable.
"Oh noes, Blaziken is sleeping! What's this? A Full Heal? And if he's awake, then Dream Eater is useless? Hurrays!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:23 pm
If I only had half a clue as to what you were all talking about I'd be able to participate....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:24 pm
Ruination_Star If I only had half a clue as to what you were all talking about I'd be able to participate....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:26 pm
They're talking about the actual pokemon games now instead of the show. I myself have one, and whenever I get really bored I whip it out and start training the pokemon I have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:29 pm
That my friend explains why I have no clue as to whats going on....I never got into that game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:49 pm
Which one didn't you get into? (There's like ten or twelve versions of it. Three to a different season of pokemon the tv show)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:00 pm
The answer is simple, none of the above. I was a sadly deprived child. I focused on FPS games and survival horrors. That and the people I hung out with couldn't stand pokemon so I buckled to peer pressure and stayed away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:14 pm
The people I hang out with.....I hang out with too many people. I swear you'd think there were three different versions of me. ONe group is a buch a geeks where we sit there talking about computers and science and what not, the other a buch of classic guys. We talk about everything you'd think guys talk about, porn, viedo games, and all that junk. And then somehow I ended up with a group of girls...I'm still trying to figure out how the hell it happend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:18 pm
I tried hard not to hang out with people. Most of them were snobs and I despise snobs. I live in an upscale neighborhood. Those I do hang out with are like your groups geeks and classic girls. We didn't talk about porn though....guys were always a popular topic. Quote: And then somehow I ended up with a group of girls...I'm still trying to figure out how the hell it happend You're cute...girls flock around cute people. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:29 pm
You can call me cute all you want two, but I think the geek part fits me the most. I've got no problem when it come to talking to girls but I've never had enough backbone to ask a girl out....and I'm pretty sure I never will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:13 pm
er...uh... ^^; I always always more of a Psyduck person, myself. *pets CloudKicker, then get hit with random plushie* @_@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
