|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 8:25 am
CGrascal If the mods are doing their job, they should be removing sigs of boys making out with each other, since it can be offensive to some users. Why signal out one variation of a sig theme and not go after another one? Well, the boys are usually sorta wearing pants/things that could be classified as pants. I think the "problem" with the sig, was, um, the lack of pants. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 8:26 am
Perhaps they should make yet another mod variation, this one dealing solely with the viewing and monitering of signatures. Or, as I stated in the off-topic thread, they could redo the TOS and clarify the errors in it to eliminate the loopholes and make it so people know where the line is drawn.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 8:28 am
Uncle Kenny Perhaps they should make yet another mod variation, this one dealing solely with the viewing and monitering of signatures. Or, as I stated in the off-topic thread, they could redo the TOS and clarify the errors in it to eliminate the loopholes and make it so people know where the line is drawn. Yeah. I'd really like some clarification on the pants issue myself, because if you think about it, then newbs would be against the TOS. pirate
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 9:46 am
I need to use the DELICIOUS CAKE pic as a sig and see what the consequences are.... ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 10:06 am
Comrade Clara Uncle Kenny Perhaps they should make yet another mod variation, this one dealing solely with the viewing and monitering of signatures. Or, as I stated in the off-topic thread, they could redo the TOS and clarify the errors in it to eliminate the loopholes and make it so people know where the line is drawn. Yeah. I'd really like some clarification on the pants issue myself, because if you think about it, then newbs would be against the TOS. pirate That's what I was just thinking. There was nothing in my signature that you can't see on a Gaia avatar.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 11:43 am
Sir Ichigo Comrade Clara Uncle Kenny Perhaps they should make yet another mod variation, this one dealing solely with the viewing and monitering of signatures. Or, as I stated in the off-topic thread, they could redo the TOS and clarify the errors in it to eliminate the loopholes and make it so people know where the line is drawn. Yeah. I'd really like some clarification on the pants issue myself, because if you think about it, then newbs would be against the TOS. pirate That's what I was just thinking. There was nothing in my signature that you can't see on a Gaia avatar. I'm wondering why:
1. the nakey glitch took so long to get rid of 2. Aren't there panties on the avatars anyway?
|
 |
 |
|
|
[sarcastic innocence] Crew
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|