|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:31 pm
you PM the mod with that?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:39 pm
if you donate arn't you suposted to not see adds?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 4:10 pm
Jason A. Delacroix you PM the mod with that? Yep. No response yet. goldbrease if you donate arn't you suposted to not see adds? That's what they said, but donating just makes the ads sporadic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 4:14 pm
Tanasha Jason A. Delacroix you PM the mod with that? Yep. No response yet. goldbrease if you donate arn't you suposted to not see adds? That's what they said, but donating just makes the ads sporadic. sporadic?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:08 pm
hum...the guy didnt answer ur sig removal question sweatdrop
EDIT: referring to ur last post on the first page ^^;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:29 pm
Hey guys. Admins gaving Tanasha trouble? surprised
sweatdrop Tanasha can be stubborn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:52 pm
Tippmann Hey guys. Admins gaving Tanasha trouble? surprised No, the mods are. Well, the mods and policy contradictions... Tippmann sweatdrop Tanasha can be stubborn. Indeed, but that's usually because I don't like to back down when I'm right. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 8:02 pm
I made an a post in the thread regarding Isigs. Support for your side but I believe I can explain about the difference between your paypal and the IPOd ad.
As they stated, paypal will not condone linkage with anyone that is not the woner of the site. You are not the owner of gaia, so it go's against paypal's Tos, not gaia's. As for the Ipod's, that ad was placed by the admins, making it legal on.. some level at least. Personally I believe that all ads online should be outlawed, but thats just me. Still though, the admins have lied to you. You danoted yet still see ads. Thats infraction enough I think.
As for Gaia becomming Neopets.. when they start coming out with a Gaian monthly magazine, then we'll talk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 8:10 pm
Indrid Cold I made an a post in the thread regarding Isigs. Support for your side but I believe I can explain about the difference between your paypal and the IPOd ad. As they stated, paypal will not condone linkage with anyone that is not the woner of the site. You are not the owner of gaia, so it go's against paypal's Tos, not gaia's. As for the Ipod's, that ad was placed by the admins, making it legal on.. some level at least. Personally I believe that all ads online should be outlawed, but thats just me. Still though, the admins have lied to you. You danoted yet still see ads. Thats infraction enough I think. As for Gaia becomming Neopets.. when they start coming out with a Gaian monthly magazine, then we'll talk. no once they release pet and then replease pets for pet, and then release pets for pets for pets. then we will talk. its alredy wierd enought that i can add myself to my friends list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 8:59 am
http://www.gaiaonline.com/guilds/viewtopic.php?t=142904&start=0Tanasha I have removed the text in question - aren't you supposed to issue a warning *before* disabling a sig? terradi Your signature is being removed for libel. In addition I am issuing an official warning due to the breaking of Terms of Service: ToS VI-1 "upload, post, email, graphically portray, or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, There was nothing unlawful, harmful, or threatening in my sig. terradi abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, Then may I assume that you have taken action against Jahoclave for saying it in gaia in the first place? It wouldn't be fair to punish somebody for quoting something but let the original speaker go free. That was not libel, according to the meaning of the word. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SlanderIt was a direct quote, and only being included to establish that Jahoclave engages in personal attacks and the use of vulgarity terradi invasive of another's privacy, Things you say in public are not private. terradi hateful, racist or otherwise objectionable." Nope, nope, and another term which would apply to him more than me. terradi Altering text in order to give a false impression of a users' statements The text in question was NOT ALTERED in any way, shape, or form. terradi and then taking it entirely out of context is considered to be against Terms of Service, as stated above. The removal from context was soley the result of sigs not being large enough to hold the entire paragraph, and the 'context' was more personal attacks against me. Allow me to quote the entire post, so that you can take the actions required by those clauses agaisnt HIM: Jahoclave Tanasha, as much as a tried to be civil. Go ******** yourself. You're not even trying to get what I say. Especially when I say ammunition and guns, it's kind of obvious they have weapons. I don't need some magic detector. Stop being such a god damn troll. And in no way am I going to sit here and be treated like a damn ignorant child. If you want to be an elitest p***k, go do it somewhere else. A paragraph full of libel, personal attacks, and obcenities, posted in a publicly accessable forum. terradi On Gaia Online we encourage a friendly atmosphere which all users are expected to be respectful to each other. So he WILL be warned for his abuse, then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 9:55 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 2:57 pm
terradi Tanasha I have removed the text in question - aren't you supposed to issue a warning *before* disabling a sig? You were asked multiple times to take it off and refused to comply. You had your chance. I acted only after discussing the issue with another moderator to get full feedback on what proper procedure was for this type of action. Thus, protocol has been followed entirely. Jahoclave's statement was perfectly fair in the context which it was taken from. I quoted the entire statement to the other moderator I was discussing this with and recieved consensus on it. I am not going to play word games with you in which the person who is most capable of analyzing the other's statements, quoting the dictionary and attempting to poke holes in the argument is the determining factor in who the winner is. I followed protocol entirely, and the end result is the warning which you recieved and the disabling of your signature which has now been reversed due to the fact that you took the statement out of your signature. You don't have to like it. In fact, I rather expect you not to as you recieved a warning for it. However, I will not be backing down on this. If you have issues with my conduct or feel that I have treated you unfairly, you can contact one of the admins about it and present your evidence. I'm interested in what you all think of this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:59 pm
Gees Tanasha, what have you gotten yourself into this time? sweatdrop
Yes, i did read that thread in which this had spawn from. I mean, all you did was post twice in there flying off his, apprently, unstable rules of engagement. Or rather, he calls it "war"
As much of a war-monger I am. And you should know me by now. I wouldnt suggest a "door-to-door" elimination of insurgence. I mean, its already clear that civilians over there has the same access to weapons as we have access to flee markets. Heck, i'll even straight out say it. Hong Kong, i had straight access to illegal things just by being their at the right time.
Though, i much do not like the way Mod quel down disruptions. It sounds like they side with whoever came crying and whining to their feet.
Secondly, Their explainations are very... fragile. I couldnt think of anything other words. At which point, did who did what?
Jahoclave's statment was perfectly fair? I wonder what kind of definition they use for "Fair".
I would rather like them Explain a Post by Post errors.
By the way, why'd you even waste your time arguing with him? Heck, if he ignores the fact about US history that caused such mistake, what makes his propaganda worth wasting you time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 6:40 pm
The point the mods called me on was putting this line: Jahoclave Tanasha, as much as a tried to be civil. Go ******** yourself into my sig. I still think that it was perfectly acceptable according to the ToS. The fact is that he ignored every refference I provided, he chose to alter the meaning of a word to fit how he used it, and couldn't even find a way to express exactly was wrong with what I said. When he got frustrated he resorted to obsceneties and personal attacks, and I put as much of what he said as I could into my sig as a trophy. Now, I would have removed it if he asked, but he didn't ask - he ordered. I wasted time arguing with him because he made a post that looked EXACTLY like somebody who was trolling - a policy of "door-to-door total war" is usually considered to be far outside the realm of sane and rational thought - and I responded to him as if that were so. I guess it just comes down to the simple fact that it's lots of fun to pick on crazy people who don't realize they have a problem. ThrieTheTiger Though, i much do not like the way Mod quel down disruptions. It sounds like they side with whoever came crying and whining to their feet. Basicly? Yep, exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
