| Gonna enter? |
| Hell yeah! |
|
64% |
[ 11 ] |
| Maybe, if I get some inspiration |
|
23% |
[ 4 ] |
| Nah, I'm too lazy XD |
|
11% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:08 am
this is my dream card.. or close to what it was anyways. my graphic design teacher took one look at it an twitched... he was correct to do so, as he was looking for professional Black and White sweatdrop I will make a Black and White "normal" card too... but anyways, if I could, this is what I would use:  ok.... here is the black and white traditional card... I still have a feeling that my teacher would twitch if he ever got a peek at this, but I never was good at the "professional" look sweatdrop
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:31 pm
 > Black and white traditional card 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Bahhhhhhh the colourful one is definitely better! I think a card should really bring out the personality and direction of your 'business', and your colourful one suits yours perfectly 3nodding The black and white one... doesn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:54 pm
Chisa Bahhhhhhh the colourful one is definitely better! I think a card should really bring out the personality and direction of your 'business', and your colourful one suits yours perfectly 3nodding The black and white one... doesn't. ^___^ thank you both! heart I had a whole digital Portfolio on CD with a lable and jewlcase I made to match, but the teacher said it wouldn't do in those colors sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:40 pm
Here's my first entry: Front: Back: I have another 1 or 2 planned, I'll try to get them up later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:56 pm
Oh, so pretty Chisa!
Yeah, I love that blue and yellow stars one... wow!
I don't know if I'm going to have time to do one.... must, find, time.....
*Zzzzz*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 1:39 am
Lord_Michieru, yours is amusing!!
I'm going to submit a simpler one... sometime... *tries to whip brain back into imaginative mode*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:05 pm
Kunama Lord_Michieru, yours is amusing!! I'm going to submit a simpler one... sometime... *tries to whip brain back into imaginative mode* ph34r t3h 1337 ph070 m4n1pu1a710n sk1llz!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 11:58 pm
My 2nd entry. (Now that Gaia's working, I can actually post this post >_< ) Front:  Back:  Bigger versions for the front and backAs always, the details are fake whee Why are the pics always so big when they are saved for web, but always look more normal sized on my screen in Photoshop?! stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:02 am
Kunama Why are the pics always so big when they are saved for web, but always look more normal sized on my screen in Photoshop?! stressed What resolution are your creating them at? 72dpi or ppi is standard for web, 300dpi/ppi for print.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:34 am
Chisa Kunama Why are the pics always so big when they are saved for web, but always look more normal sized on my screen in Photoshop?! stressed What resolution are your creating them at? 72dpi or ppi is standard for web, 300dpi/ppi for print. yeppers... what I hate is when I copy something from a vector program and paste it into a bitmap program.. it always trys to make the vector image tiny, even when the dpi is set the same..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:24 am
Chisa What resolution are your creating them at? 72dpi or ppi is standard for web, 300dpi/ppi for print. Um.. the first was at 300ppi, 2nd was something less, but still more than 72. So 'dots per inch' == 'pixels per inch' ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:13 am
Kunama Chisa What resolution are your creating them at? 72dpi or ppi is standard for web, 300dpi/ppi for print. Um.. the first was at 300ppi, 2nd was something less, but still more than 72. So 'dots per inch' == 'pixels per inch' ? I think so. I have heard the two terms used interchangably
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
