|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:45 pm
youporn is a good site to use. ive gone on it alot and there hasnt been a problem. if you have like an ipod touch or something, go to youporn and there are some short 30 second -1 minute clips there. hope i can help! mrgreen
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:50 pm
youporn is a good site its a .com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:49 pm
Go to google images and TURN OFF safeserch....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:57 pm
phantomcookies Go to google images and TURN OFF safeserch.... A Tad basic I must say but works none the less. Megaporn (com) is great for Hentai if that is your cup of tea. Badjojo (com) is a fantastic site that as well as hosting, links to a number of Free streaming videos of just about every type you could ever want. Free-hardcore (com more of an advertisement site with numerous 10-30 second clips detailing Fetishes including Bondage, electric, rape, urine, a**l play, water bondage, machines and more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:54 pm
I'm a girl and I have nothing against porn! But when I can't listen or watch, I try reading dirty stories (literotica in google) or dirty fan fiction. Because you can totally do it when other people are home ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:00 pm
xA L Y S S AxB A B E E i like pornhub.com they have like 30 min videos and its free i love pornhub. its great. if you ever go there look me up, same name as on here. xtube is pretty good, thousands of home vids with decent quality
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:29 am
pornhub dot com
xnxx dot com
jj dot am
myfreecams dot com
girlsandvids dot com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:37 pm
I normally use youporn or fleshbot, which links you off to other sites.
I also like to read porn sometimes (it comes from having dial up for many years where I couldn't watch porn, so I read it). I normaly use literotica, nifty or sometimes, adulttfanfiction dotnet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:10 am
Keep in mind, that many porn actress were sexually abused as children! Many are drug addicted, and/or have serious alcohol problems. To be sexual, the "guilty" feeling has to be suppressed (shaken off).
The added demand, you provide to the porn industry, increases the demand (and profits) for sexual products - including sex slaves (who are bought, sold, and treated like products).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:16 pm
Basilia Ann E
Keep in mind, that many porn actress were sexually abused as children! Many are drug addicted, and/or have serious alcohol problems. To be sexual, the "guilty" feeling has to be suppressed (shaken off).
The added demand, you provide to the porn industry, increases the demand (and profits) for sexual products - including sex slaves (who are bought, sold, and treated like products).
Not everyone feels guilty about being sexual. In fact, most people don't. Sexuality is perfectly normal, natural, and even necessary for the continuation of the species! So there really is no reason to feel guilty about it. Yes, many porn stars were abused or are on drugs. But the same can be said of people working in pretty much any field. There are formerly abused teachers, social workers, and lawyers. There are drug addicted cashiers, police officers, and doctors. And that's a shame. But it doesn't mean there is anything wrong with those fields. Some porn is tied to the sex slave industry, child abuse, animal abuse, or even murder. But most porn isn't. So you don't have to be afraid of porn in general. You just have to be make sure the porn that you're watching only involves consenting adults.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:43 am
LorienLlewellyn Basilia Ann E
Keep in mind, that many porn actress were sexually abused as children! Many are drug addicted, and/or have serious alcohol problems. To be sexual, the "guilty" feeling has to be suppressed (shaken off).
The added demand, you provide to the porn industry, increases the demand (and profits) for sexual products - including sex slaves (who are bought, sold, and treated like products).
Not everyone feels guilty about being sexual. In fact, most people don't. Sexuality is perfectly normal, natural, and even necessary for the continuation of the species! So there really is no reason to feel guilty about it. Yes, many porn stars were abused or are on drugs. But the same can be said of people working in pretty much any field. There are formerly abused teachers, social workers, and lawyers. There are drug addicted cashiers, police officers, and doctors. And that's a shame. But it doesn't mean there is anything wrong with those fields. Some porn is tied to the sex slave industry, child abuse, animal abuse, or even murder. But most porn isn't. So you don't have to be afraid of porn in general. You just have to be make sure the porn that you're watching only involves consenting adults.
That's your opinion! (and you're entitled to it) However, research supports my view. Yes, there are victims of sexual abuse in all industries, but it's prevalent amongst female porn actresses.
Further, we are not born sexual - it's a learned behavior. It's not biological - because of STD's. Our (species) is designed to be monogamous (like the wolf). {FYI - designed to does not refer to intelligent design. It refers to animals evolving into their environments with specific environmental features. Whether or not this infers God or not is a matter of yourown belief.} The chemistry of STD's is what makes monogamy (for humans and other such species) a biological factor - and not a cultural one.
Your belief (in sexuality) which is a common myth - has been repeatedly warned about in the journal "Science" as superbugs (drug resistant strains of STD's). The journal articles and the CDC (Center for Disease Control) is concerned with the collapse of the medical system due to this disturbing trend.
Due to the myths being taught to our generation (in general) we have a historical note. We will be the first generation, in modern medical history, to have a shorter lifespan than our parents. We enter critical heart disease at 35 instead of 45. We will be on medication for life, do to sexuality and STD's, at a younger age (19 years old) and in the largest numbers. This has created a concern in the health insurance industry. Health insurance had used the health of young people (16+) to pay for the cost of older people (45+). STD's have eliminated this.
Condoms, and the vaccine for girls, only reduce the risk - not eliminate it. Increase your risk (your sexuality) and reduce your protection.
{For reference; follow researcher/research links not general public links}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:02 am
Basilia Ann E Further, we are not born sexual - it's a learned behavior. Sexuality is natural. If it wasn't, the human race would go extinct. We cannot reproduce asexually. Basilia Ann E It's not biological - because of STD's. STDs do not prove that sex isn't natural. If they did, then air-born illnesses would prove that breathing isn't natural. Basilia Ann E Our (species) is designed to be monogamous (like the wolf). Not entirely. Very few animals are monogamous. Recent research suggests that we're probably no exception. We seem to be sort of hardwired to find a long-term mate to help us raise our children but also to cheat on that mate with people who have better genes. That's probably why most people find monogamy so difficult. And while it might not sound pretty, it really is a good approach from an evolutionary standpoint. It gives us the best genes and the best provider for our children. Basilia Ann E The chemistry of STD's is what makes monogamy (for humans and other such species) a biological factor - and not a cultural one. Many STDs can be spread through birth or through breast milk. HIV can be also spread through blood. Crabs can be spread from sharing towels or clothes. Etc. So monogamy would certainly cut down on STD transmission. But it wouldn't totally eliminate it. Basilia Ann E We enter critical heart disease at 35 instead of 45. We will be on medication for life, do to sexuality and STD's, at a younger age (19 years old) and in the largest numbers. Most STDs won't kill you, shorten your lifespan, or require lifelong medication. Heart disease certainly can shorten our life. In fact, heart disease is the most common cause of death in America right now. But that is primarily due to diet and doesn't really have anything to do with sex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:08 am
LorienLlewellyn Basilia Ann E Further, we are not born sexual - it's a learned behavior. Sexuality is natural. If it wasn't, the human race would go extinct. We cannot reproduce asexually. Basilia Ann E It's not biological - because of STD's. STDs do not prove that sex isn't natural. If they did, then air-born illnesses would prove that breathing isn't natural. Basilia Ann E Our (species) is designed to be monogamous (like the wolf). Not entirely. Very few animals are monogamous. Recent research suggests that we're probably no exception. We seem to be sort of hardwired to find a long-term mate to help us raise our children but also to cheat on that mate with people who have better genes. That's probably why most people find monogamy so difficult. And while it might not sound pretty, it really is a good approach from an evolutionary standpoint. It gives us the best genes and the best provider for our children. Basilia Ann E The chemistry of STD's is what makes monogamy (for humans and other such species) a biological factor - and not a cultural one. Many STDs can be spread through birth or through breast milk. HIV can be also spread through blood. Crabs can be spread from sharing towels or clothes. Etc. So monogamy would certainly cut down on STD transmission. But it wouldn't totally eliminate it. Basilia Ann E We enter critical heart disease at 35 instead of 45. We will be on medication for life, do to sexuality and STD's, at a younger age (19 years old) and in the largest numbers. Most STDs won't kill you, shorten your lifespan, or require lifelong medication. Heart disease certainly can shorten our life. In fact, heart disease is the most common cause of death in America right now. But that is primarily due to diet and doesn't really have anything to do with sex.
Brief rebuttal by point.
Reproductive sex is natural - Sexuality is not! Sexuality is the behavior not the biological function. These two have been commonly believed to be the same - but they are not. {A little look a Freud or Jung (psychology) will confirm this.}
Epidemiology assume monogamy as standard for both. STD's are passed when one of the pair was not fully monogamous - but monogamous only in marriage. The medical studies in the epidemiology of STD's show they are only passed, and exist, when a non-monogamous factor enters the gene pool.
CDC studies have shown (as you stated) that monogamy would cut down on STD infection rates.
CDC studies have also shown that STD rates, requiring lifelong medication, are at all time highs and rising. This includes HIV. The fastest rising group are teens and young adults (16 to 24).
Consequently, studies are showing that date-rape is also in the increase, with ages (for girls) getting younger.
Heart disease was not presented as a consequence of sexuality - but an argument on the common misinformation (junk science) affecting our generation. Think, we are living in the age of the great medical capability (historically) and our expected lifespan is decreasing not increasing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:57 am
I disagree, Basilia.
It's not actually sexuality. As children we are curious, you want to see yours, what it's like, what others look like, that's not sexual in any way. Yet, it's completely natural. It's not taught. Yes, it may be increased due to it being "bad", but as children, others tend to not dwell on it because you're innocent, have no understanding, so therefore don't get the idea that "it's not to be touched, seen, or talked of".
If you've ever read anything on sexuality, you'd know that it's a completely natural thing, even if it's not for sexual purposes. As children, you actually masturbate. Not to get off, it's just natural to play with your genitals. It's not sexual by any means, it's just an instinct.
If you are going to relate animals to this you may want to take into consideration that whats sexual to us isn't necessarily sexual to animals. They have no boundaries, they lick others genitals, sniff about, it's not sexual. It's natural, an instinct.
If it's not natural for us to have these emotions, why do animals and children have these emotions?
They define what's natural.
Animals and children cannot be taught.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
