|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:21 am
Spike The Super Saiyan Basicly this question all comes down to who would you want playing for your team, i say romo no doubt. i wouldent even want eli 2nd string Romo is good, I give you that. But to not want a Super Bowl MVP as even a second stringer on the bench? That's just pure arrogance. And yeah, even if last year wasn't enough to prove you wrong, I'd like to see it settled on the field.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:28 am
Spike The Super Saiyan how is your opinion stronger? anyways im gonna let the preformance of these two young qb do the talking for me and if eli preforms better than romo this year i will pubilcly admit i was wrong. but it wont happen How do you define "perform"? Eli wasn't that consistent during the regular season, yet turned it around for the last 5 games to win a Super Bowl. Romo had a great regular season, but didn't play well in his playoff opener, again. How about who goes farther into the postseason, leading their teams?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:53 pm
Dude-LAP Spike The Super Saiyan how is your opinion stronger? anyways im gonna let the preformance of these two young qb do the talking for me and if eli preforms better than romo this year i will pubilcly admit i was wrong. but it wont happen How do you define "perform"? Eli wasn't that consistent during the regular season, yet turned it around for the last 5 games to win a Super Bowl. Romo had a great regular season, but didn't play well in his playoff opener, again. How about who goes farther into the postseason, leading their teams? Romo has done nothing to show if he is a so called "great" and eli has i think thats what dude is trying to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:23 am
I have to say Eli (even tho he looks like a doofy 12 year old, romo looks like a baby faced 9 year old haha)
Eli won the superbowl (because tampa let them win haha jk) and well the cowboys havent won a playoff game in what 20 years? Romo has a better supporting cast on both D and O, Eli has a good amount of ppl to help him but not as much as Dallas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:09 am
Duke_619 I have to say Eli (even tho he looks like a doofy 12 year old, romo looks like a baby faced 9 year old haha) Eli won the superbowl (because tampa let them win haha jk) and well the cowboys havent won a playoff game in what 20 years? Romo has a better supporting cast on both D and O, Eli has a good amount of ppl to help him but not as much as Dallas. Exactly, it's that simple: Eli succeeded with less, Romo failed with more. Eli stepped it up in the playoffs, Romo played sub-par in his playoff career. So far, Eli > Romo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:16 am
Dude-LAP Duke_619 I have to say Eli (even tho he looks like a doofy 12 year old, romo looks like a baby faced 9 year old haha) Eli won the superbowl (because tampa let them win haha jk) and well the cowboys havent won a playoff game in what 20 years? Romo has a better supporting cast on both D and O, Eli has a good amount of ppl to help him but not as much as Dallas. Exactly, it's that simple: Eli succeeded with less, Romo failed with more. Eli stepped it up in the playoffs, Romo played sub-par in his playoff career. So far, Eli > Romo. but i still hate both.....lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:19 pm
Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 I have to say Eli (even tho he looks like a doofy 12 year old, romo looks like a baby faced 9 year old haha) Eli won the superbowl (because tampa let them win haha jk) and well the cowboys havent won a playoff game in what 20 years? Romo has a better supporting cast on both D and O, Eli has a good amount of ppl to help him but not as much as Dallas. Exactly, it's that simple: Eli succeeded with less, Romo failed with more. Eli stepped it up in the playoffs, Romo played sub-par in his playoff career. So far, Eli > Romo. but i still hate both.....lol Why? Because Garcia couldn't compete in the NFC East with the Eagles? ...lol, j/k. He could have took them far, if McNabb wasn't in Philly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:07 am
Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 I have to say Eli (even tho he looks like a doofy 12 year old, romo looks like a baby faced 9 year old haha) Eli won the superbowl (because tampa let them win haha jk) and well the cowboys havent won a playoff game in what 20 years? Romo has a better supporting cast on both D and O, Eli has a good amount of ppl to help him but not as much as Dallas. Exactly, it's that simple: Eli succeeded with less, Romo failed with more. Eli stepped it up in the playoffs, Romo played sub-par in his playoff career. So far, Eli > Romo. but i still hate both.....lol Why? Because Garcia couldn't compete in the NFC East with the Eagles? ...lol, j/k. He could have took them far, if McNabb wasn't in Philly. Haha i have never like Eli or Romo ever since they came into the NFL idk why they just annoy me. Garcia played better than McNabb did, and if the eagles would have made it outta the 2nd round they would have won the SuperBowl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:15 am
Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 I have to say Eli (even tho he looks like a doofy 12 year old, romo looks like a baby faced 9 year old haha) Eli won the superbowl (because tampa let them win haha jk) and well the cowboys havent won a playoff game in what 20 years? Romo has a better supporting cast on both D and O, Eli has a good amount of ppl to help him but not as much as Dallas. Exactly, it's that simple: Eli succeeded with less, Romo failed with more. Eli stepped it up in the playoffs, Romo played sub-par in his playoff career. So far, Eli > Romo. but i still hate both.....lol Why? Because Garcia couldn't compete in the NFC East with the Eagles? ...lol, j/k. He could have took them far, if McNabb wasn't in Philly. Haha i have never like Eli or Romo ever since they came into the NFL idk why they just annoy me. Garcia played better than McNabb did, and if the eagles would have made it outta the 2nd round they would have won the SuperBowl. I don't think they would have won the Super Bowl that year. They barely beat the Giants, and they lost to the Saints by 3 (a game they should have won)...But I could not see the Eagles beating the Bears defense, or let alone match the Colts' offensive dominance. They reason the Colts were able to beat the Bears, was because of Indy's elite receiving core with Peyton, and also Grossman is a terrible QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 12:16 pm
Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 I have to say Eli (even tho he looks like a doofy 12 year old, romo looks like a baby faced 9 year old haha) Eli won the superbowl (because tampa let them win haha jk) and well the cowboys havent won a playoff game in what 20 years? Romo has a better supporting cast on both D and O, Eli has a good amount of ppl to help him but not as much as Dallas. Exactly, it's that simple: Eli succeeded with less, Romo failed with more. Eli stepped it up in the playoffs, Romo played sub-par in his playoff career. So far, Eli > Romo. but i still hate both.....lol Why? Because Garcia couldn't compete in the NFC East with the Eagles? ...lol, j/k. He could have took them far, if McNabb wasn't in Philly. Haha i have never like Eli or Romo ever since they came into the NFL idk why they just annoy me. Garcia played better than McNabb did, and if the eagles would have made it outta the 2nd round they would have won the SuperBowl. I don't think they would have won the Super Bowl that year. They barely beat the Giants, and they lost to the Saints by 3 (a game they should have won)...But I could not see the Eagles beating the Bears defense, or let alone match the Colts' offensive dominance. They reason the Colts were able to beat the Bears, was because of Indy's elite receiving core with Peyton, and also Grossman is a terrible QB. Eagles D could have beat the bears O and hence won the game. Who knows, maybee they could have beaten the Colts, because the bears were really bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:02 pm
Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 but i still hate both.....lol Why? Because Garcia couldn't compete in the NFC East with the Eagles? ...lol, j/k. He could have took them far, if McNabb wasn't in Philly. Haha i have never like Eli or Romo ever since they came into the NFL idk why they just annoy me. Garcia played better than McNabb did, and if the eagles would have made it outta the 2nd round they would have won the SuperBowl. I don't think they would have won the Super Bowl that year. They barely beat the Giants, and they lost to the Saints by 3 (a game they should have won)...But I could not see the Eagles beating the Bears defense, or let alone match the Colts' offensive dominance. They reason the Colts were able to beat the Bears, was because of Indy's elite receiving core with Peyton, and also Grossman is a terrible QB. Eagles D could have beat the bears O and hence won the game. Who knows, maybee they could have beaten the Colts, because the bears were really bad. Nah. The Saints, who beat the Eagles, were blown out in Chicago. A snowy game where the Bears' offense, defense, and special teams completely dominated. Anyways, the Eagles lacked the defensive line pressure to get to Peyton Manning even if they made it to the Super Bowl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:05 am
Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 but i still hate both.....lol Why? Because Garcia couldn't compete in the NFC East with the Eagles? ...lol, j/k. He could have took them far, if McNabb wasn't in Philly. Haha i have never like Eli or Romo ever since they came into the NFL idk why they just annoy me. Garcia played better than McNabb did, and if the eagles would have made it outta the 2nd round they would have won the SuperBowl. I don't think they would have won the Super Bowl that year. They barely beat the Giants, and they lost to the Saints by 3 (a game they should have won)...But I could not see the Eagles beating the Bears defense, or let alone match the Colts' offensive dominance. They reason the Colts were able to beat the Bears, was because of Indy's elite receiving core with Peyton, and also Grossman is a terrible QB. Eagles D could have beat the bears O and hence won the game. Who knows, maybee they could have beaten the Colts, because the bears were really bad. Nah. The Saints, who beat the Eagles, were blown out in Chicago. A snowy game where the Bears' offense, defense, and special teams completely dominated. Anyways, the Eagles lacked the defensive line pressure to get to Peyton Manning even if they made it to the Super Bowl. this is true, their d line still isnt too great
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:18 am
Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Haha i have never like Eli or Romo ever since they came into the NFL idk why they just annoy me. Garcia played better than McNabb did, and if the eagles would have made it outta the 2nd round they would have won the SuperBowl. I don't think they would have won the Super Bowl that year. They barely beat the Giants, and they lost to the Saints by 3 (a game they should have won)...But I could not see the Eagles beating the Bears defense, or let alone match the Colts' offensive dominance. They reason the Colts were able to beat the Bears, was because of Indy's elite receiving core with Peyton, and also Grossman is a terrible QB. Eagles D could have beat the bears O and hence won the game. Who knows, maybee they could have beaten the Colts, because the bears were really bad. Nah. The Saints, who beat the Eagles, were blown out in Chicago. A snowy game where the Bears' offense, defense, and special teams completely dominated. Anyways, the Eagles lacked the defensive line pressure to get to Peyton Manning even if they made it to the Super Bowl. this is true, their d line still isnt too great Kind of like the Bucs. Both Philly and Tampa Bay have a great secondary, great linebackers, yet only a decent defensive line. An improvement in their line would break them into the elite D's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 1:05 pm
Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Haha i have never like Eli or Romo ever since they came into the NFL idk why they just annoy me. Garcia played better than McNabb did, and if the eagles would have made it outta the 2nd round they would have won the SuperBowl. I don't think they would have won the Super Bowl that year. They barely beat the Giants, and they lost to the Saints by 3 (a game they should have won)...But I could not see the Eagles beating the Bears defense, or let alone match the Colts' offensive dominance. They reason the Colts were able to beat the Bears, was because of Indy's elite receiving core with Peyton, and also Grossman is a terrible QB. Eagles D could have beat the bears O and hence won the game. Who knows, maybee they could have beaten the Colts, because the bears were really bad. Nah. The Saints, who beat the Eagles, were blown out in Chicago. A snowy game where the Bears' offense, defense, and special teams completely dominated. Anyways, the Eagles lacked the defensive line pressure to get to Peyton Manning even if they made it to the Super Bowl. this is true, their d line still isnt too great Kind of like the Bucs. Both Philly and Tampa Bay have a great secondary, great linebackers, yet only a decent defensive line. An improvement in their line would break them into the elite D's. Are you kidding me? Tampa's D line is more than decent Greg White LE: 50 tackles, 1 PD, 8 sacks, 7 FF Gaines Adams RE: 55 Tackles, 4 PD, 6 sacks, 2 FF (only started 8 games) Kevin Carter LE: 73 tackles, 1 PD, 3 sacks, 1 FF Chris Hovan DT: 95 Tackles, 2 PD, 1.5 Sacks Jovan Haye: 97 tackles, 3 PD, 6 Sacks 1 FF Thats better than decent. Yes there is room for improvement, but its way better than the Eagles D-line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:53 pm
Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Dude-LAP Duke_619 Eagles D could have beat the bears O and hence won the game. Who knows, maybee they could have beaten the Colts, because the bears were really bad. Nah. The Saints, who beat the Eagles, were blown out in Chicago. A snowy game where the Bears' offense, defense, and special teams completely dominated. Anyways, the Eagles lacked the defensive line pressure to get to Peyton Manning even if they made it to the Super Bowl. this is true, their d line still isnt too great Kind of like the Bucs. Both Philly and Tampa Bay have a great secondary, great linebackers, yet only a decent defensive line. An improvement in their line would break them into the elite D's. Are you kidding me? Tampa's D line is more than decent Greg White LE: 50 tackles, 1 PD, 8 sacks, 7 FF Gaines Adams RE: 55 Tackles, 4 PD, 6 sacks, 2 FF (only started 8 games) Kevin Carter LE: 73 tackles, 1 PD, 3 sacks, 1 FF Chris Hovan DT: 95 Tackles, 2 PD, 1.5 Sacks Jovan Haye: 97 tackles, 3 PD, 6 Sacks 1 FF Thats better than decent. Yes there is room for improvement, but its way better than the Eagles D-line. 11 forced fumbles is great for a defensive line, but just 24.5 defensive line sacks won't make it "very good." Yes, it is better than decent, but I was comparing it to the rest of the Bucs D, by saying it was "decent." Yes, it's also better than the Eagles' defensive line, especially with Adams and White.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
