|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:29 am
Devlin-G CH1Y0 ]None of the above I'm afraid. The Moslems who were involved in the crusades are dead; who are they to be offended? Those who are alive were not involved in the crusades and I have not refered to them previously and hence have no right to be offended. Just to prevent missunderstandings, the moslems are not a religion they follow Islam which is. You Madame are mistaken, Muslim cultures are generally known to be proud cultures so never the less they would be offended because it were their ancestors during these times, as I am offended with certain things regarding the Irish and Scottish. and as another thing, you offend them by not correcting Moslom to Muslim Im sure the jihadist's around the world would be pleased to see that. they would be offended so yea. (I am only posting this as a way, to show that it is offensive, to the Arab world) Pride is no virtue, from a jihadist's perspective you have done a greater disservice than I. You profess to be offended by things relating to your lineage but if I were to say that the kings of Ireland were individually foolish to ally with Longshanks; would that offend you?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:18 am
Mistakes were made, and I am not denying that pride has been the downfall of many great men and civilizations But these are problems that we will never be rid of. And yes The Kings of Ireland at the time made a tragic folly to ally with england and led to English rule in Ireland later on. But still, Proud peoples do get offended none the less, I am offended period from the subject of the English rule over Ireland till the 1920's and am still none to happy that Scotland is still a part of the UK. but those are not the discussions at hand and would be best for a different date to be discussed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:02 pm
We recently covered the Crusades in my history class. Being in a Catholic school I expected a toned down version that gave more of the Church's side to the story. I guess I underestimated my teacher. She gave both sides to it, and it really does come across as being a horrible thing for Catholics to have done. Maybe I just say that though because I have a little more attraction to Islam than I do to Christianity.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:13 pm
boleromo We recently covered the Crusades in my history class. Being in a Catholic school I expected a toned down version that gave more of the Church's side to the story. I guess I underestimated my teacher. She gave both sides to it, and it really does come across as being a horrible thing for Catholics to have done. Maybe I just say that though because I have a little more attraction to Islam than I do to Christianity. Sadly contempory history looks down on the Christian part of the crusades. The good men who went out to defend Byzantium from the Moslem invaders are villified, partly because of the farce that was the fourth crusade. Hopfully the wheel will turn and the goodness will shine through once more.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galad Aglaron Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:48 pm
Religions have always used their perspective deities as excuses to do shitty stuff to people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:19 am
Galad Damodred Religions have always used their respective deities as excuses to do shitty stuff to people. Certainly this is often true but it is not always so simple nor always the case.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galad Aglaron Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:24 am
Fine. Religions have very often used their respective deities as an excuse to do shitty stuff to people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:13 pm
I'd rather you two don't harp on religion...I get angry.
Besides, isn't this about the CONFLICTS? Not speculation of what would happen (CH1Y0) or the Gods whom these people followed and how people use them as excuses to do bad things.
I'm not denying it, but let's keep it to facts about the subject at hand, please?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:44 am
Nasuko-San I'd rather you two don't harp on religion...I get angry. Besides, isn't this about the CONFLICTS? Not speculation of what would happen (CH1Y0) or the Gods whom these people followed and how people use them as excuses to do bad things. I'm not denying it, but let's keep it to facts about the subject at hand, please? Way to go, Nasuko. You have a real talent for killing threads. What are you inferring when you say, "I get angry". Is that supposed to be a threat? I don't think it's a really smart thing to say...if anyone gets hacked, they very well may point fingers at you. Your favorite historical person is Hitler. Many people could have been offended by that, but nobody ruined a thread by voicing it, or threatening you.
The group is discussing/debating a part of history that was mostly about religious beliefs that lead to conflict. It's a little difficult to leave religion out of the discussion, and a discussion without opinions is, what? Not a discussion?
For that matter, unless you want only to talk about history dating from the 20th century, it would be fairly difficult to never mention religion, being our ancestors did almost everything in the name of religion. In fact, Hitler even acted upon his religious beliefs. It is only our modern culture that tries to keep quiet about religion and mostly acts upon the premise of materialism. So, if you want to kill the entire guild, keep threatening people when they express their opinions on one of the most important factors and causes of history.
I am going to make an attempt to bring this thread back to life because it's a very interesting subject. Below is a quote from Encarta Encyclopedia. Please note that the writers were not afraid to include the very important religious factors of the Crusades."The Crusaders carved out feudal states in the Near East. Thus the Crusades are an important early part of the story of European expansion and colonialism. They mark the first time Western Christendom undertook a military initiative far from home, the first time significant numbers left to carry their culture and religion abroad. In addition to the campaigns in the East, the Crusading movement includes other wars against Muslims, pagans, and dissident Christians and the general expansion of Christian Europe. In a broad sense the Crusades were an expression of militant Christianity and European expansion. They combined religious interests with secular and military enterprises. Christians learned to live in different cultures, which they learned and absorbed; they also imposed something of their own characteristics on these cultures. The Crusades strongly affected the imagination and aspirations of people at the time, and to this day they are among the most famous chapters of medieval history. Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2006. © 1993-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:59 am
Clutzy_Ditz Way to go, Nasuko. You have a real talent for killing threads. What are you inferring when you say, "I get angry". Is that supposed to be a threat? I don't think it's a really smart thing to say...if anyone gets hacked, they very well may point fingers at you. Now don't get all pissed at me because people didn't post in your thread. I'm sorry I get offended about people insulting religions. I'm just saying that you should try to keep it to damned facts, not speculation or insults. And, no, they really won't. Because I'm not a hacker. I don't do that stuff. But you bringing it up is suspicious. Clutzy_Ditz Your favorite historical person is Hitler. Many people could have been offended by that, but nobody ruined a thread by voicing it, or threatening you. I never said "lol i luv hitler!!11" I said he was one of my favorite military strategists, so go shove it. Clutzy_Ditz The group is discussing/debating a part of history that was mostly about religious beliefs that lead to conflict. It's a little difficult to leave religion out of the discussion, and a discussion without opinions is, what? Not a discussion? By all means, express opinions, but insulting religions isn't really an opinion...it's just wrong. Clutzy_Ditz For that matter, unless you want only to talk about history dating from the 20th century, it would be fairly difficult to never mention religion, being our ancestors did almost everything in the name of religion. Okay. I never said not to talk about it, but back things up with facts. Again, skirt away from insults. It's offensive, and it just makes your points look implausible. Clutzy_Ditz In fact, Hitler even acted upon his religious beliefs. It is only our modern culture that tries to keep quiet about religion and mostly acts upon the premise of materialism. Nooooo. He was a devout Catholic, but he persecuted everyone, including Catholics. Clutzy_Ditz So, if you want to kill the entire guild, keep threatening people when they express their opinions on one of the most important factors and causes of history. Person who hasn't done anything to contribute to the guild says "what"? All I'm saying is I tend to get angry when people take it too far. Express opinions and views, but don't go around saying stuff like "lol teh arabz ne3d sum soap" or something along those lines. Edit: Now drop this argument.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:22 am
Nasuko-San Clutzy_Ditz Way to go, Nasuko. You have a real talent for killing threads. What are you inferring when you say, "I get angry". Is that supposed to be a threat? I don't think it's a really smart thing to say...if anyone gets hacked, they very well may point fingers at you. Now don't get all pissed at me because people didn't post in your thread. I'm sorry I get offended about people insulting religions. I'm just saying that you should try to keep it to damned facts, not speculation or insults. And, no, they really won't. Because I'm not a hacker. I don't do that stuff. But you bringing it up is suspicious. Clutzy_Ditz Your favorite historical person is Hitler. Many people could have been offended by that, but nobody ruined a thread by voicing it, or threatening you. I never said "lol i luv hitler!!11" I said he was one of my favorite military strategists, so go shove it. Clutzy_Ditz The group is discussing/debating a part of history that was mostly about religious beliefs that lead to conflict. It's a little difficult to leave religion out of the discussion, and a discussion without opinions is, what? Not a discussion? By all means, express opinions, but insulting religions isn't really an opinion...it's just wrong. Clutzy_Ditz For that matter, unless you want only to talk about history dating from the 20th century, it would be fairly difficult to never mention religion, being our ancestors did almost everything in the name of religion. Okay. I never said not to talk about it, but back things up with facts. Again, skirt away from insults. It's offensive, and it just makes your points look implausible. Clutzy_Ditz In fact, Hitler even acted upon his religious beliefs. It is only our modern culture that tries to keep quiet about religion and mostly acts upon the premise of materialism. Nooooo. He was a devout Catholic, but he persecuted everyone, including Catholics. Clutzy_Ditz So, if you want to kill the entire guild, keep threatening people when they express their opinions on one of the most important factors and causes of history. Person who hasn't done anything to contribute to the guild says "what"? All I'm saying is I tend to get angry when people take it too far. Express opinions and views, but don't go around saying stuff like "lol teh arabz ne3d sum soap" or something along those lines. You just proved my point. Why don't you read the the entire thread again, so you'll know what you're talking about. I've been all over this guild, and, I don't care if you are part of the crew now, you have been "offended" many times without truly reading what was said. You get offended, but your profile is one of the most offensive profiles I've seen on this site. But, I'm a Grandmother of 46. I quit taking offense to every little thing a long time ago. It's called maturity. I've contributed gold to the guild, and a guild needs normal members as much as it needs crew members. If the crew gets offended too often, there will be nothing but crew left.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:41 am
I can do that. You did a very good job with the newsletter, by the way.
Now, would anyone like to continue discussing the Crusades? I will quote Encarta again, as a re-opening, because Encarta sounds much smarter than I do xd "The Crusaders carved out feudal states in the Near East. Thus the Crusades are an important early part of the story of European expansion and colonialism. They mark the first time Western Christendom undertook a military initiative far from home, the first time significant numbers left to carry their culture and religion abroad. In addition to the campaigns in the East, the Crusading movement includes other wars against Muslims, pagans, and dissident Christians and the general expansion of Christian Europe. In a broad sense the Crusades were an expression of militant Christianity and European expansion. They combined religious interests with secular and military enterprises. Christians learned to live in different cultures, which they learned and absorbed; they also imposed something of their own characteristics on these cultures. The Crusades strongly affected the imagination and aspirations of people at the time, and to this day they are among the most famous chapters of medieval history. Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2006. © 1993-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:16 pm
I'm perfectly happy to resume discourse if this foolishness is done with.
With regards to the quote I find that it is a little deceptive as the crusades were not the first forrays of Christianity into the region (which it suggests, not states to the contrary) for of course, as well as being the holy land it too was Byzantium; a waning Christian empire, founded of course by the Romans. They were of course not expansionist either; they were about retaking lands, not taking new lands; 'twas the Moslems that were expansionist.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:46 pm
Nasuko-San CH1Y0 What's offensive about it? They're far too long dead to be offended. You're kidding me, right? The Muslims are one of the worlds MAJOR FRIGGIN RELIGIONS. You're just an ignorant American, aren't you? Becuase every American is ignorant, right?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|