who will/would you vote for......? | Page 2 | The Lounge | Guild Forums

Mr. Puppet
Crew

Offline

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:37 pm

But then we would be defenseless against terrorist attacks cool
A country without a strong military ain't s**t.

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:16 pm

Mr. Puppet

But then we would be defenseless against terrorist attacks cool
A country without a strong military ain't s**t.

:O im not talkin bout taking away all weapons, but to take away like 50% of weapons and military, that would save alot of money but dont take away all the military so u can defend urself, and just doing war is just waste of money and lifes on both sides, politics is better if u ask me surprised xd

Edit = for fixing a lil wrong in spelling

Malmen

Offline

Allah The Eternal
Crew

Offline

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:52 pm

Malmen

Mr. Puppet

But then we would be defenseless against terrorist attacks cool
A country without a strong military ain't s**t.

:O im not talkin bout taking away all weapons, but to take away like 50% of weapons and military, that would save alot of money but dont take away all the military so u can defend urself, and just doing war is just waste of money and lifes on both sides, politics is better if u ask me surprised xd

Edit = for fixing a lil wrong in spelling

Objection!

Dont take away 50%...thats too high of a number. I'd say 20-25% of the military spending (lol I know it seems like a small number, but it could benefit the economy) could go to better causes.

And remember, sometimes war is necessary. Diplomatic negotiations dont always work....sometimes you have to use force to get your message across. Its the same thing with bullies. You cant keep running away and telling them "Leave me alone." you have to stand up and confront them.

Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:40 pm

Obama is originally from Hawaii, where i'm from (but that is not the reason i'd vote for him) he's against war, and many other things that i'm too lazy to list. plus.. he knows what he is doing other than that other woman he is running against. i don't think anyone could stand a chance running against him actually.. that's probably why the other guy.. don't know his name, waved his flag and gave up the whole thing.

darienn

Offline

darienn

Offline

Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:41 pm

Mr. Puppet

But then we would be defenseless against terrorist attacks cool
A country without a strong military ain't s**t.

true..

Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:45 pm

Allah The Eternal

Malmen

Mr. Puppet

But then we would be defenseless against terrorist attacks cool
A country without a strong military ain't s**t.

:O im not talkin bout taking away all weapons, but to take away like 50% of weapons and military, that would save alot of money but dont take away all the military so u can defend urself, and just doing war is just waste of money and lifes on both sides, politics is better if u ask me surprised xd

Edit = for fixing a lil wrong in spelling

Objection!

Dont take away 50%...thats too high of a number. I'd say 20-25% of the military spending (lol I know it seems like a small number, but it could benefit the economy) could go to better causes.

And remember, sometimes war is necessary. Diplomatic negotiations dont always work....sometimes you have to use force to get your message across. Its the same thing with bullies. You cant keep running away and telling them "Leave me alone." you have to stand up and confront them.

ye 50% was too high i can admit, but tho usa have ben fighting lots of wars lately razz

oh, and see this video, not wondering why american economy is sinking!! (its a fake but funny video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoXgRtDysLY&feature=related

Malmen

Offline

Welcome to Gaia! ::

Gaia Guilds

New Era

Quick Reply

More Information