|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 5:51 pm
i belive that it shouldnt be as a birth control, but then again i belive that people can make mistakes. makes no sense huh xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 9:14 am
Life in adversity is better than a life where a child gets everything they want.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 8:15 pm
FreeArsenal Life in adversity is better than a life where a child gets everything they want. Because adversity builds charcter?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 8:52 pm
I have one data point. No, statistically, that doesn't account for much ... but it matters to me.
So, two Methodists in Nebraska wanted to experiment around in a casual relationship before they respectively got married, never intending to get serious. The woman was seven years older than the man, and the interest was mostly platonic.
There was an accident: the condom failed, and she got pregnant. And, like any good Methodist, they got married. Moved to the San Francisco area, got a beautiful house, had another kid.
Problems started when the older kid, the son, was about in third grade. They argued more and more, and by the end of the year they had divorced, moving from the beautiful house to a tiny apartment. The mom had to work full-time to support her two children, and that in combination with her bad experiences more or less doomed her social life. And, saddest of all, she blamed it all on her son.
Repeatedly. Loudly. To his face.
Already a misfit at his local school, the son was truly convinced that absolutely no one wanted him. When we was 17 years old, one Wednesday night he took his father's shotgun, aimed it at his face, and pulled the trigger. The note said, "I'm sorry I was an inconvenience to anyone."
So don't paint me a happy picture of cheerful families and wholesome children. 100% of the couples I know who married due to accidental pregnancy have gotten divorced, and divorce is never a healthy thing for children.
No, most of 'em don't kill themselves - but there are those who do. And what's better, a dead embryo that no one grieves, or a dead person who leaves hundreds of mourners in his passing?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 6:06 pm
ReiDuck I have one data point. No, statistically, that doesn't account for much ... but it matters to me. So, two Methodists in Nebraska wanted to experiment around in a casual relationship before they respectively got married, never intending to get serious. The woman was seven years older than the man, and the interest was mostly platonic. There was an accident: the condom failed, and she got pregnant. And, like any good Methodist, they got married. Moved to the San Francisco area, got a beautiful house, had another kid. Problems started when the older kid, the son, was about in third grade. They argued more and more, and by the end of the year they had divorced, moving from the beautiful house to a tiny apartment. The mom had to work full-time to support her two children, and that in combination with her bad experiences more or less doomed her social life. And, saddest of all, she blamed it all on her son. Repeatedly. Loudly. To his face. Already a misfit at his local school, the son was truly convinced that absolutely no one wanted him. When we was 17 years old, one Wednesday night he took his father's shotgun, aimed it at his face, and pulled the trigger. The note said, "I'm sorry I was an inconvenience to anyone." So don't paint me a happy picture of cheerful families and wholesome children. 100% of the couples I know who married due to accidental pregnancy have gotten divorced, and divorce is never a healthy thing for children. No, most of 'em don't kill themselves - but there are those who do. And what's better, a dead embryo that no one grieves, or a dead person who leaves hundreds of mourners in his passing? One-sides propoganda.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 11:37 pm
kp606 ReiDuck I have one data point. No, statistically, that doesn't account for much ... but it matters to me. So, two Methodists in Nebraska wanted to experiment around in a casual relationship before they respectively got married, never intending to get serious. The woman was seven years older than the man, and the interest was mostly platonic. There was an accident: the condom failed, and she got pregnant. And, like any good Methodist, they got married. Moved to the San Francisco area, got a beautiful house, had another kid. Problems started when the older kid, the son, was about in third grade. They argued more and more, and by the end of the year they had divorced, moving from the beautiful house to a tiny apartment. The mom had to work full-time to support her two children, and that in combination with her bad experiences more or less doomed her social life. And, saddest of all, she blamed it all on her son. Repeatedly. Loudly. To his face. Already a misfit at his local school, the son was truly convinced that absolutely no one wanted him. When we was 17 years old, one Wednesday night he took his father's shotgun, aimed it at his face, and pulled the trigger. The note said, "I'm sorry I was an inconvenience to anyone." So don't paint me a happy picture of cheerful families and wholesome children. 100% of the couples I know who married due to accidental pregnancy have gotten divorced, and divorce is never a healthy thing for children. No, most of 'em don't kill themselves - but there are those who do. And what's better, a dead embryo that no one grieves, or a dead person who leaves hundreds of mourners in his passing? One-sides propoganda. Propaganda? The hell does this have to do with propaganda? That guy in the little story: I dated him for a while. So this is biographical, not propaganda. I'm simply saying that there are times when everything just goes horribly wrong.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:49 am
Nethilia, you support life but believe abortion should still be an option?
You're simply pro-choice then, though you'd rather they dont abort unless needed.
So, you're pro-choice. You may have a different beleif than others, but it's still pro-choice.
Otherwise, you'd still sound like an ignorant hypocrite. Not saying you are, saying you sound like one.
Just my two cents, hm?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:45 am
ReiDuck kp606 ReiDuck I have one data point. No, statistically, that doesn't account for much ... but it matters to me. So, two Methodists in Nebraska wanted to experiment around in a casual relationship before they respectively got married, never intending to get serious. The woman was seven years older than the man, and the interest was mostly platonic. There was an accident: the condom failed, and she got pregnant. And, like any good Methodist, they got married. Moved to the San Francisco area, got a beautiful house, had another kid. Problems started when the older kid, the son, was about in third grade. They argued more and more, and by the end of the year they had divorced, moving from the beautiful house to a tiny apartment. The mom had to work full-time to support her two children, and that in combination with her bad experiences more or less doomed her social life. And, saddest of all, she blamed it all on her son. Repeatedly. Loudly. To his face. Already a misfit at his local school, the son was truly convinced that absolutely no one wanted him. When we was 17 years old, one Wednesday night he took his father's shotgun, aimed it at his face, and pulled the trigger. The note said, "I'm sorry I was an inconvenience to anyone." So don't paint me a happy picture of cheerful families and wholesome children. 100% of the couples I know who married due to accidental pregnancy have gotten divorced, and divorce is never a healthy thing for children. No, most of 'em don't kill themselves - but there are those who do. And what's better, a dead embryo that no one grieves, or a dead person who leaves hundreds of mourners in his passing? One-sides propoganda. Propaganda? The hell does this have to do with propaganda? That guy in the little story: I dated him for a while. So this is biographical, not propaganda. I'm simply saying that there are times when everything just goes horribly wrong. And you're putting emphasis on that horribly wrong part, so much so that the fact that actual "happy" unplanned births do occur is overshadowed by this sad, negative, outlook on "un-planned" children.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:34 am
Mcphee But in cases of rape, I am not going to try and force the woman to have that baby if she is emotionally unable to. There are many other reasons for being "emotionally unable to" be pregnant and carry to term. Granted rape is a pretty nasty one, but there are others, other that cause just as much grief; finances, future plans. OK, I don't like doing this, but I'm going to give an example from personal experience. I have two friends, Cassie and Niel. This time 9 months ago Cassie was studying for her Masters in Theology, Niel was studying a Bachelors degree in History. 7 months ago Cassie decides that she is in a good, steady and happy relationship. She wants to come off the Pill and get the British version of Norplant ((it's the same thing but 3 years and not 5)). You have to have a pregnancy test before they let you have one. Cassie learns she is 2 months pregnant. CAssie is Pro-Choice but would not choose an abortion unless absolutely neccessary. Both her and Niel had to quit university ((Niel for the second time)), leave town to go to Cassie's mother's. Niel had just quit his job to study, so had no income anymore. Niel still has no job, he is thinking of joining the army, just to support his girl and child ((due next week)). Cassie is a strong willed and strong minded young woman, with a really possitive outlook on everything, she's just about coping. She continued to work right up untill her final month of pregnancy, supporting Niel. How many other women could cope with that? Some? Yes. Many? Perhaps. All? No. I couldn't, I know that for sure ((but then just the thought of having something growing inside of me that will want to one day come out between my legs make me fell sick)). So, rape is not the only reason for emotional break downs during pregnancy. kp606 And you're putting emphasis on that horribly wrong part, so much so that the fact that actual "happy" unplanned births do occur is overshadowed by this sad, negative, outlook on "un-planned" children. Just adding the other side to the coin. Pro-Lifers only view the one side. Pro-Choice see both, and wish for the people in the situation to make the best judgement they can on what will happen in the immediate future - then make the choice themselves. I know unplanned children can be loved, have good lives. Hell I was one ((well, kinda... Mother: "I'm on the Pill dear, nothing to worry about... *snicker*" That does not mean they all will. Yes, we cannot guess the future, but sometimes we can make a damned good guess, and if that future seems bleak enough I beleive abortion is better. Ever read Prozac Nation? I think everyone should...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:11 am
Quote: Just adding the other side to the coin. Pro-Lifers only view the one side. Pro-Choice see both, and wish for the people in the situation to make the best judgement they can on what will happen in the immediate future - then make the choice themselves.
Actually I was just about to preach you the exact opposite, the lifer sees both (as we openly admit life has it's downs and ups) but it seems the Pro-choicers are quick to say you should abort off the belief the child will live an unhappy or unsuccsseful life. We are quick to say why choose at all when it's going to be both happy and sad numerous times in it's life. Quote: That does not mean they all will. Yes, we cannot guess the future, but sometimes we can make a damned good guess, and if that future seems bleak enough I beleive abortion is better. Ever read Prozac Nation? I think everyone should... No but I have a feeling on what's it about's. However as you said, guess, and a guess is only a guess. Playing the what-if game over someone's life is nobody's privaledge.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 7:28 am
kp606 Actually I was just about to preach you the exact opposite, the lifer sees both (as we openly admit life has it's downs and ups) but it seems the Pro-choicers are quick to say you should abort off the belief the child will live an unhappy or unsuccsseful life. We are quick to say why choose at all when it's going to be both happy and sad numerous times in it's life. No Choicer worth thier salt would say "You should abort..." That's not choice. It's not about happy and sad, that's far too Disney for real life. If you do not think that you can afford to feed and clothe a baby, and you decide it would be better for no person to ever have existed, then that is your perogative as the woman carrying the foetus. Quote: No but I have a feeling on what's it about's. However as you said, guess, and a guess is only a guess. Playing the what-if game over someone's life is nobody's privaledge. No one exists at the point of abortion. No thoughts have occured, no actions have been taken, there is no person, only an empty shell awaiting the thoughts, memories and actions that make up a human person. You know why you cannot know the future? Because it has not happened yet. You are not affecting anyone's future because the future has not been set down yet, there is nothing to change because you cannot change what does not exist. Combine that with the fact that no person even exists yet; voila, no persons future is being affected in such a way that anyone would ever know. Gah, it's too hot for philosophical quantum theory...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:14 pm
Quote: No Choicer worth thier salt would say "You should abort..." That's not choice. That wasn't what I meant. This sums it up better; "You should have the right to abort, because," Quote: It's not about happy and sad, that's far too Disney for real life. If you do not think that you can afford to feed and clothe a baby, and you decide it would be better for no person to ever have existed, then that is your perogative as the woman carrying the foetus. If a child is inadequately clothed and fed he will most likely be "sad" or at least "unhappy". It's a perogative that lacks logic. You have no knowledge, or support as to say why your child is better off non-existant, you can always have clues and evidence that leads one way or another but the future is a mystery. You shouldn't be allowed to decide whether or not that child lives just because you "think" you have somebody's best interests at heart, because you don't. Quote: No one exists at the point of abortion. Existance is not debatable. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=existence As long as a fetus is, it exists, it doesn't matter what it is capable of. Quote: No thoughts have occured, no actions have been taken Only matters person by person. Some people, such as myself, don't believe your ability to think judges your identity. ...depending on who you ask. If a a mother tells you her fetus is a person, are you allowed to tell her she's wrong, and be right about it? If you asked me, even if I was female, i'd say yes there is a person. Quote: only an empty shell awaiting the thoughts memories and actions that make up a human person. Okay now THIS sounds like it's from a Disney movie. It doesn't await these things, it's merely developing the part needed for the capacity to think, remember, and be mobile, it's displaying the human characteristic of growth. And again, I do not think these things make up the human person. Rather, they make the individuality that seperates us all.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 2:37 am
kp606 If a child is inadequately clothed and fed he will most likely be "sad" or at least "unhappy". Sad? I'd say more than sad. A starving, cold, naked child is going to be utterly miserable. A child who's mother has to leave it at home because she cannot afford child care on top of all the bills a child brings with it when she goes to work. Is not going to be sad. It's going to be one the most wretched sights you will ever see. Quote: It's a perogative that lacks logic. You have no knowledge, or support as to say why your child is better off non-existant, you can always have clues and evidence that leads one way or another but the future is a mystery. You shouldn't be allowed to decide whether or not that child lives just because you "think" you have somebody's best interests at heart, because you don't. Why not? As I said, no person yet exists. You harming no one that is alive yet. Saying that a woman cannot have an abortion, to remove a shell from her body, that is not a person, is like saying a woman may not choose when to not have sex, because she is choosing not to start the processes which create a new body, which will one day be a person. Quote: As long as a fetus is, it exists, it doesn't matter what it is capable of. Not what I said. The foetus, the shell, exists. That is a complete given. But a person; nope. Quote: No thoughts have occured, no actions have been taken Only matters person by person. Some people, such as myself, don't believe your ability to think judges your identity. Not the ability to think ((which a foetus does not have anyway)). The actual thoughts, memories and actions. Identicle twins are two seperate people, despite having the same genetic code. Why are they different; because no two beings can exist in the same place at the same moment in time. All their experiences are different, thus making them individuals. ...depending on who you ask. If a a mother tells you her fetus is a person, are you allowed to tell her she's wrong, and be right about it? If you asked me, even if I was female, i'd say yes there is a person. So now we are down to personal choice. Are you allowed to tell a woman her foetus is a person, if that is not what she believes? Quote: Okay now THIS sounds like it's from a Disney movie. It doesn't await these things, it's merely developing the part needed for the capacity to think, remember, and be mobile, it's displaying the human characteristic of growth. And again, I do not think these things make up the human person. Rather, they make the individuality that seperates us all. Ah, you're playing with my flowery language. I don't know what came over me *pokes pretty fantasy book she is reading*. You may not think it, but I ((and many others...don't make philosophy students your friends, they'll fry your brain)) do. Also, if you want to take up this point. The foetus, then, is not an individual; then it must be part of the mother, it must also not be of consequence, as another can be created just as easily. You cannot recreate an individual, only in science fiction is this possible.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|