|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:58 pm
Mirko_Filipovic Son Hakkai Jass, after reading your information on the ninja, I seem to think you belive the samurai and ninjitsu came from china. In many ways this could be correct, but the ninja really had no origin, as they where spys, assasins or anything that could earn them money or respect (more-so money) Iga was a popular spot for "ninja" activity, and the general Hanzo Hattori was from Iga. Hattori Hanzo, who was from the ninja, held the title of hatamoto (banner-bearer), the highest rank a samurai (and only a samurai) could have. Iga ninja had no ties to the chinese (or there is no information of that) E.G(of a ninja):If Lord Date's wife's maid is passing what she overhears Date saying about his plans in his sleep to an agent of mine, she's most definitely conducting shinobi activity. Does it mean she's trained to kill 37 ways with a chopstick? No. (Sources:Samurai-Archives, Tony's posts in forums) (tony is a historian) Would you really want to credit one of your biggest legends of being of foreign descent? I think not. Haha, exactly. CelestialDreamz Sorry if I misunderstood Jass, but it's kind of early in the morning for someone like me. Are you saying that ninja are of Chinese descent? I've heard the term Forest Demons before, although I could just have a bad memory. Anyway, the way I heard them described was as a Chinese version of the Japanese ninjas, not as the ninjas themselves. Tell me how Genbukan's history is almost completely mythical. Yes, Shinobi were generall (and mainly) of chinesed defence, coming to Japan to escape whatever regime/war was going on in their own country, however like all outcasts they would over time be joined by morre. In this case Japanese insurgents (bringing more martial arts to the table, it is thought this is where Ninjutsu's connection to Koryu JuJutsu systems originated) As for Genbukan. You find these schools tend to be almost split into two. Quite alot of them regaling students with tales of daring mid night assasinations, pacts with demons, almost superhuman powers, Godai etc surprised However a few schools do encorporate more grounded history. As I've said, the quality control on Taijutsu schools as a whole is low.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:38 pm
Jass This has been discussed to death on Gaia and on other forums, please research more on other websites such as Bullshido.net and I'm sure you shall find a multitude of sources. Well, a quick search didn't yield any results in that direction (though, I didn't search that thoroughly, it's past 1am and I've been up since 4am already). However, even the one article that came somewhat close to your views, however, mentioned that among the refugees would probably have been soldiers, (warrior) monks, practicioners of chinese martial arts etc., which seems quite probable to me, too. Those people could have blended in with the Japanese society and become soldiers, mercenaries, and also assassins and spies. Why not? Interesting enough, though, Wikipedia doesn't have any history part included in articles about the subject stare Btw, I think it's not that good to tell anyone to "look for yourself" without any directions, because if one does he will most probably end up either at Bullshido sites or sites that just state the popular beliefs (which seems to be the same in your understanding). Isn't that what the Anti-Bullshido guild should take care against? So, again, point me to sources, please, a single URL will probably suffice for starters. Jass And why would you be so suprised I'm calling BS on Hatsumi? I do it all the time, we all do. If you find that offensive then please pick up your panties on the way out. Though this and also the next statement probably wasn't meant for me, I'll state my opinion. To begin with, I don't really care who you call Bullshido on, even if it might be me (in fact, after this posting I would be surprised if nobody did; feel free to do so if you like xp ), but if you do, you should also offer solid evidence on the things you say. The mentioning of the lack of steel in Japan is an IMHO small hint that your theory might be true, not really evidence. There's quite a variety of weapons that you can make without any steel, so if anything this is merely a indication on the existence or non-existence of the Ninja-to. As I understand it, what you said before is mainly your own (and some of the other people in the guild's) theory/opinion. Therefore, I think you'll understand that I'll take the word of people who I learned to trust above that of people I absolutely don't know unless there's something to convince me. Jass You say you find Taijutsu effective for you? Then great, as for its history, is that why you're really into it? If thats the case then I suggest you take up another hobby...little knitting. Well, of course not, but I guess we all like to know something about the background of what we do, don't we? I take it as a hint on why some techniques are taught the way they are, and to better see what is applicable today, what is not, and what can or has to be changed to use it today. Well, fsck, 2 and a half hour of sleep left... I guess I'll regret this posting on the double tomorrow mad
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 3:46 am
Quote: You say you find Taijutsu effective for you? Then great, as for its history, is that why you're really into it? If thats the case then I suggest you take up another hobby...little knitting. I am into every aspect on ninjutsu, I find the history interesting and don't see why that makes me any less of a martial artist, if it can only progress your understanding of an art and where it came from. Quote: And why would you be so suprised I'm calling BS on Hatsumi? I do it all the time, we all do. If you find that offensive then please pick up your panties on the way out. Same here, call BS on whom ever you like, I don't think I'll be picking up anyones panties.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:47 am
Kasasaki Btw, I think it's not that good to tell anyone to "look for yourself" without any directions, because if one does he will most probably end up either at Bullshido sites or sites that just state the popular beliefs (which seems to be the same in your understanding). Isn't that what the Anti-Bullshido guild should take care against? So, again, point me to sources, please, a single URL will probably suffice for starters. I believe this is a valid request... hell, I'm curious my damn self. All this Ninja historical talk has always peaked my interest. Though I have no affilation with Ninjutsu, nor have never practiced... I'm curious to how the classical stances and techniques as shown in Hatsumi's various books... are modernized to work in today's time.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:10 pm
The truth is that they are mostly not ''modernized'' as such. It''s because most of the technqiues etc still work in today''s society as well as they did then. Obviously if someone has a gun your going to give up your wallet (bag etc) to them without a fight unless you are sure you can take them or unless your stupid.
Ninjutsu does work in this time and place, having evolved with the times but keeping the classical kamae (body postures) and basic Kihon Happo which are basically the eight techs that all the rest spread out from.
I''ve also been looking around and found your point on carrying guns etc...we learn to use Hanbos and Bo staffs as well as Taijutsu and the various techniques of the body.
''Modernizing'' is a strong word, can you define what you would think is ''modernizing''?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:30 pm
I am not a part of this guild but I have to say one thing. There were indeed ninjas. How do I know? There was a program about ninjas on the Discovery Channel. They had there a ninja master, the 37 generation ninja master. He is still teaching in Japan in a small privatly chosen school. Now I would say, if you would like to tell the Discovery Channel that their professional historians and immense resourses are wrong be my guest. But I have a feeling they could probably reveal some things that you have never seen before. As well as the fact that my friend was part of a ninja clan. I did meet his parents, and saw their nice weapons collection. Note that these weapons were relics, over 150 years old. As well as new weapons. If you'd like to tell them that they were brought up on something that did not exsist be my guest. I do not however like the misconceptions about the ninja. There was a ninjato to my knowledge, however, it was rarely used. From my understanding it was used more in defence of their strong hold or for assainations. That could be wrong though. But to say they never existed is a tad bit foolish. They existed, probably not in the way we know but they most certainly existed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:33 pm
[ Kami-sama ] I am not a part of this guild but I have to say one thing. There were indeed ninjas. How do I know? There was a program about ninjas on the Discovery Channel. They had there a ninja master, the 37 generation ninja master. He is still teaching in Japan in a small privatly chosen school. Now I would say, if you would like to tell the Discovery Channel that their professional historians and immense resourses are wrong be my guest. But I have a feeling they could probably reveal some things that you have never seen before. As well as the fact that my friend was part of a ninja clan. I did meet his parents, and saw their nice weapons collection. Note that these weapons were relics, over 150 years old. As well as new weapons. If you'd like to tell them that they were brought up on something that did not exsist be my guest. I do not however like the misconceptions about the ninja. There was a ninjato to my knowledge, however, it was rarely used. From my understanding it was used more in defence of their strong hold or for assainations. That could be wrong though. But to say they never existed is a tad bit foolish. They existed, probably not in the way we know but they most certainly existed. And this is the REASON you're not part of this guild.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 6:46 pm
Also, getting back to this thread in a bit as soon as I have more free time, DON'T close it or they'll be hell to pay.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:43 am
Jass Also, getting back to this thread in a bit as soon as I have more free time, DON'T close it or they'll be hell to pay. lol ~topic closed~ xp j/k
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:33 pm
Taijutsuguy The truth is that they are mostly not ''modernized'' as such. It''s because most of the technqiues etc still work in today''s society as well as they did then. Obviously if someone has a gun your going to give up your wallet (bag etc) to them without a fight unless you are sure you can take them or unless your stupid. Ninjutsu does work in this time and place, having evolved with the times but keeping the classical kamae (body postures) and basic Kihon Happo which are basically the eight techs that all the rest spread out from. I''ve also been looking around and found your point on carrying guns etc...we learn to use Hanbos and Bo staffs as well as Taijutsu and the various techniques of the body. ''Modernizing'' is a strong word, can you define what you would think is ''modernizing''? Well, when I think of "Modernizing", I'm referring to the fact that we do not live in 16th Century Japan. Many things are different. Your average person has a higher chance of being skilled to some degree at fighting. I can't understand how there is a problem defining the word "Modernize". Opponents fight diffeently now, so styles such as Ninjutsu have no choice but to reform, or become obsolete. Being that the chances are highly unlikely that the Japanese of the 16th Century had the capability to fight Brazilians, English, Indians, or whatever have you.... I can't imagine that the style in its historical form, has methods to deal with these ways of fighting. But then again, I could be wrong... because I have no knowledge of Ninjutsu other than what I continue to read about it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 2:48 pm
The art as a whole hasn't been modernized, to my knowledge. I've never studied Bujinkan Ninjutsu, but I've read some of Hatsumi's books. I'd have to say that if you're looking for gun defenses, etc, look for a different martial art. There has been no "mass modernization," for lack of a better term, of ninjutsu. Individual schools have taken it into their hands to incorporate more modern techniques into it, however it's arguable that these schools no longer teach traditional ninjutsu.
Jass, hurry up with your response already. =P This guild has been getting pretty dry. We need a nice, controversial discussion. Not necessarily on this topic, but a discussion nonetheless.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 9:11 pm
CelestialDreamz The art as a whole hasn't been modernized, to my knowledge. I've never studied Bujinkan Ninjutsu, but I've read some of Hatsumi's books. I'd have to say that if you're looking for gun defenses, etc, look for a different martial art. There has been no "mass modernization," for lack of a better term, of ninjutsu. Individual schools have taken it into their hands to incorporate more modern techniques into it, however it's arguable that these schools no longer teach traditional ninjutsu. Jass, hurry up with your response already. =P This guild has been getting pretty dry. We need a nice, controversial discussion. Not necessarily on this topic, but a discussion nonetheless. Ah, ok... I'm starting to understand. Well, I did a little research on the Modernization of Ninjutsu as a whole. The only information I was able to find, stemmed from the Bujinkan by way of Stephen Hayes. Basically, what I read was that a few years ago, he started what he labelled was "Quest Centers". As I read on, I came to understand that Hayes didn't actually tech Bujinkan Taijutsu at these quest centers, but that it was a simpler form of the Taijutsu with modernized techniques to deal with specifically boxers and gunscalled Toshin-Do. The Quest Centers were basically Shotokan and Taekwondo schools, of which Hayes solicited to teach the style out of. From what I learned, the students of Hayes' Quest Centers, do not hold rank within the Bujinkan or any of the other Hombu's. This was the only form of Modernized Taijutsu I could find. I also found a few threads poking fun at the quest centers over at Bullshido.Net, but I save my personal opinion for when I am able to try the centers out myself. Taijutsuguy... would you happen to have any other info? Learn more about Toshindo at his offical website http://www.skhquest.com/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:13 am
This is probably a slightly late reply but I shall try to answer as best I can. SKH, Van Donk and Brian Mcarthy were all amongst some of the first foreigners to train with Hatsumi. All of them eventually split off, SKH and Van Donk training till the rank of Shihan and Mcarthey till he became a black belt (this was in the days when Hatsumi gave out black belts to basically anyone whom made they're way to train in Japan, due to the dedication of spending money and time etc to get there). Brian split off to make the BBD, Bujinkan Brian Dojo, which I shall not speak of here. Van Donk and SKH both went back to they're native countries and formed 'Americanised' versions of what they saw to be Ninjutsu. Van Donk's page This is the URL for 'Master' Van Donk's webpage, VD is still connected with the Bujinkan but runs a very commerical company. Anyway, yes SKH...well, SKH split from the Bujinkan and formed these quest centers. They are not affiliated with Bujinkan at all but do teach things from the Bujinkan arts. He has indeed modernized and formed a newer form of Taijutsu however the 'body-weapon' is open to different things. For example, we ARE taught to defend against an assailiant with a gun, but why not just hand over your wallet and save your skin? Anymore questions?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 9:30 am
Taijutsuguy He has indeed modernized and formed a newer form of Taijutsu however the 'body-weapon' is open to different things. For example, we ARE taught to defend against an assailiant with a gun, but why not just hand over your wallet and save your skin? Anymore questions? Yes, please elaborate on this "Body Weapon".
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:23 pm
You guys know it's no longer called the Ninja-to right? And Ninja didn't wear black.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|