|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:07 pm
ImShiZZle Curssive ImShiZZle Curssive ImShiZZle Curssive Before accusing anyone. Do you have proof? You don't need any proof! The bin laden videos,9/11,EVERYTHING,is a whole bunch of s**t. He's got everything planned out. To put this country in fear. Theres no telling who's really behind it.. Maybe a shadow organization is behind it and Bush is just their front-man for blame. Stop it. You know everything I said is true. No one needs proof at all. Were intelligent enough to know. Never said it wasn't true or wasn't, I'm just argueing the possibility of something else and maybe not all the blame goes to one person. I'm leaning towards it being true but there is always doubt. Ok so how about when a criminal has a record of stealing and going to jail but he's innocent this time. Would you automatically beleive he is guilty? When a person with no criminal record is charged with something and he is guilty. Would you believe the person innocent? Without sufficient proof. Oh ok. Well yeah,I guess ;/ Typo. I meant to say never said it was true or wasn't true.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:15 pm
Simply put: 9/11 was an inside job. My boyfriend told me his theory and it really made sense, so I did some research on it and, well, here it goes:
Steel melts at 2777 degrees Fahrenheit. Jet fuel only burns at a little above half that. The only way for the towers to collapse the way they did is if a compound called Thermite was used, which burns at over 3000 degrees. Thermite is used in steel-working and in incindiary bombs (meaning bombs that don't do damage by exploding, but instead by burning). It might have been possible for our own Feds to plant such weapons and detonate them under the cover of plane crashes You see, President Bush has had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein since the Gulf War and now he has been captured and executed. But, there's an ulterior motive: Oil. Iraq is chock full of it. The entire Bush family is rich because of oil and they can stay rich (and so will those who are in good with them) if they seize Iraq's oil reserves. That's the real reason why we haven't left Iraq, even though we don't belong there anymore (then again, we didn't belong there to begin with). Make sense?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:01 pm
ImShiZZle The best video in the world would be... Bush:"I caused 9/11" The End. Okay, except that Clinton knew about the threat of an attack before Bush was elected. Seriously, Bush planning this attack? Or the feds even? People who say the U.S. government want us in paranoia... think about what your saying. You're being paranoid of our government. It was a strategic move, and it was terrorism. It's going on all the time in the middle east. Bombs in buses, cars, strapped on children, etc. So are you saying we are planning those attacks also? Also, in one of John Kerry's speeches before the last election. He said that he would be able to get the troops out of Iraq within 4-5 years if he was elected. Soo... even if we had a different president, such as Kerry, we would have still been at war. So I'm not so sure about Bush's personal vendetta. The government keeps us at bay for their own reasons. And I can see why (personal opinion). If we knew the truth, it would probably cause turmoil within the states, and could possibly divide us, and create anarchy. And also our generations are getting less intelligent, so who gives a ******** what we think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:44 pm
OutlawShadow ImShiZZle The best video in the world would be... Bush:"I caused 9/11" The End. Okay, except that Clinton knew about the threat of an attack before Bush was elected. Seriously, Bush planning this attack? Or the feds even? People who say the U.S. government want us in paranoia... think about what your saying. You're being paranoid of our government. It was a strategic move, and it was terrorism. It's going on all the time in the middle east. Bombs in buses, cars, strapped on children, etc. So are you saying we are planning those attacks also? Also, in one of John Kerry's speeches before the last election. He said that he would be able to get the troops out of Iraq within 4-5 years if he was elected. Soo... even if we had a different president, such as Kerry, we would have still been at war. So I'm not so sure about Bush's personal vendetta. The government keeps us at bay for their own reasons. And I can see why (personal opinion). If we knew the truth, it would probably cause turmoil within the states, and could possibly divide us, and create anarchy. And also our generations are getting less intelligent, so who gives a ******** what we think. If it was a strategic move from terrorists, how come the media covered facts about it? Maybe they took into account that the media would cover facts.. I don't know. Better to be suspicious than sorry, all humans are capable of planning attacks, not that I'm saying all humans are planning attacks. In my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:45 am
Femmunition D. Limit Curssive Yeah, that's all what people talked about that day in my school. I didn't know until the teacher at my school announced it. The building looked as if bombs were detonated on schedual in row going down even before the top of the building collapsed. yup, bush paid binladen 1million 2 say it wuz him wen its rlly Bush n tha CIA n all dat s**t...dey had bombs on like erry floor.... survivors in da buildin even heard a small "BANG" but nuthin happend intill "BANG" bombs exploded errywhere.... u wanna no y bush is doin dis? 2 hav a gud reason 2 go into iraq 2 take all of there oil.... Before accusing anyone. Do you have proof? ye, a rlly inspiring video calld "lost change"... n also think... I member in 1 small "bush talk" thing he wuz like "OUR MAIN ENEMY IS SADAAM HUSS-... OSAMA BINLADEN" his a** knows binladen did nuthin but ye i got alot of proof i jus g2 find tha videos... even da survivors sed "we heard a huge bang n we wonderd wut it wuz... until BANG huge explosion started" dey had bombs on like vents n s**t too so it wuz no escape n s**t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:53 am
main thang 4 me is... Government n CIA did it IN MA OPPINION n its stayin that way
in 2010 Canada, USA n Mexico will become ONE calld tha North American Union. 1 president 4 all 3 countries, dey getb rid of borders... MY OPPINION
in 2010 dey r gonna put a chip in u, 2 watch ur every move n if u get out of hand dey can set off tha chip 2 put poison in u or wuteva... MY OPPINION
Power n Greed runs tha world... soon we will hav amazing technoligy.... currently MAN runs tha world.... but in 50-1000 years TECHNOLIGY will run tha world... greed n power will take over man, man will want 2 hav robots n machines dat can do ANYTHING, next thang u no dey'll b like "im too lazy 2 say ma speech today imma send tha robot out" n tha robot makes an evil speech n takes-over xd naaaa... but soon machines will RUN tha world...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:39 pm
Femmunition OutlawShadow ImShiZZle The best video in the world would be... Bush:"I caused 9/11" The End. Okay, except that Clinton knew about the threat of an attack before Bush was elected. Seriously, Bush planning this attack? Or the feds even? People who say the U.S. government want us in paranoia... think about what your saying. You're being paranoid of our government. It was a strategic move, and it was terrorism. It's going on all the time in the middle east. Bombs in buses, cars, strapped on children, etc. So are you saying we are planning those attacks also? Also, in one of John Kerry's speeches before the last election. He said that he would be able to get the troops out of Iraq within 4-5 years if he was elected. Soo... even if we had a different president, such as Kerry, we would have still been at war. So I'm not so sure about Bush's personal vendetta. The government keeps us at bay for their own reasons. And I can see why (personal opinion). If we knew the truth, it would probably cause turmoil within the states, and could possibly divide us, and create anarchy. And also our generations are getting less intelligent, so who gives a ******** what we think. If it was a strategic move from terrorists, how come the media covered facts about it? Maybe they took into account that the media would cover facts.. I don't know. Better to be suspicious than sorry, all humans are capable of planning attacks, not that I'm saying all humans are planning attacks. In my opinion. okay. you're suspicious of the government. suppose that it was the government. what would you do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:46 pm
OutlawShadow Femmunition OutlawShadow ImShiZZle The best video in the world would be... Bush:"I caused 9/11" The End. Okay, except that Clinton knew about the threat of an attack before Bush was elected. Seriously, Bush planning this attack? Or the feds even? People who say the U.S. government want us in paranoia... think about what your saying. You're being paranoid of our government. It was a strategic move, and it was terrorism. It's going on all the time in the middle east. Bombs in buses, cars, strapped on children, etc. So are you saying we are planning those attacks also? Also, in one of John Kerry's speeches before the last election. He said that he would be able to get the troops out of Iraq within 4-5 years if he was elected. Soo... even if we had a different president, such as Kerry, we would have still been at war. So I'm not so sure about Bush's personal vendetta. The government keeps us at bay for their own reasons. And I can see why (personal opinion). If we knew the truth, it would probably cause turmoil within the states, and could possibly divide us, and create anarchy. And also our generations are getting less intelligent, so who gives a ******** what we think. If it was a strategic move from terrorists, how come the media covered facts about it? Maybe they took into account that the media would cover facts.. I don't know. Better to be suspicious than sorry, all humans are capable of planning attacks, not that I'm saying all humans are planning attacks. In my opinion. okay. you're suspicious of the government. suppose that it was the government. what would you do? If they were attacking people to manipulate them for oil, land, control (When they already have these), ect.. I don't want to let them continue attacking people for what I deem petty reasons. Now if it was to kill in defense then I'd find that acceptable but I still don't believe anyone should kill humans at all even for survival but I understand if that's what people have to do in order to survive. If it were some people in the government. I don't think I would do anything because I don't think I can, but I'd like to seek my version of justice such as charging those responsible with mass murder like those hypothetically responsible charge other people with mass murder (confinement and maybe give them a chance to reform, in this case get kicked out of the government and position of authority [I don't believe in the death penalty]). It would be the world vs. certain people responsible. If the public had enough evidence against certain people and the evidence was out there then I think it's possible. I don't see the government as a whole but individual people but those individual people may be commanded by other people who attack people for petty reasons (wether in US or another country). I know there will always be people like that and that there are other people who in other governments that do that too. What makes them so special to be picking on them? Nothing, they're the same as everyone else, therefor if they are found to be guilty, they should be punished like everyone else found guilty of a crime [Not death penalty]. Now a lot of people get away with stuff, not just people in the government, just people in general but that doesn't mean you should'nt try to stop what they're doing. I think they should be replaced by people considered non-currupt and people who will be the safest choice for authority and can lead a government, but if the people who replace them are found to be currupt or became currupt, enough to attack people for petty reasons again, then they too should be punished like everyone else [Not death penalty]. In my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:59 pm
well the question is , do you really think you're government is so twisted and demented to actually detonate two buildings(which were bringing in money since it was the world trade center) , pay someone for the blame, and killing all those people just to start a war? Well first off the us gets about 2000 terrorist threats a day. So they couldn't have possibly taken this seriously. Now Clinton knew they were going to attack, but he didn't get a team to investigate. And the people who hijacked the planes were american citizens for like 10 years. Now I'm not saying the government hasn't doned some horrible s**t, I mean they have staged killings before, but something of this magnitude? I don't think so. But nevertheless I feel the most suspicion when it comes to the pentagon situation. There are usually fighter jets all arouind the pentagon patrolling the airways, but on that day they were supposedly on a test misson? I don't get that, but anyway I'm not defending Bush or anything, but he just got caught at the wrong place at the wrong time and now he's created a bad situation that the next president elect will have to deal with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:17 pm
Shenco well the question is , do you really think you're government is so twisted and demented to actually detonate two buildings(which were bringing in money since it was the world trade center) , pay someone for the blame, and killing all those people just to start a war? Well first off the us gets about 2000 terrorist threats a day. So they couldn't have possibly taken this seriously. Now Clinton knew they were going to attack, but he didn't get a team to investigate. And the people who hijacked the planes were american citizens for like 10 years. Now I'm not saying the government hasn't doned some horrible s**t, I mean they have staged killings before, but something of this magnitude? I don't think so. But nevertheless I feel the most suspicion when it comes to the pentagon situation. There are usually fighter jets all arouind the pentagon patrolling the airways, but on that day they were supposedly on a test misson? I don't get that, but anyway I'm not defending Bush or anything, but he just got caught at the wrong place at the wrong time and now he's created a bad situation that the next president elect will have to deal with It's possible, but it's also possible for Bush not having been caught at the wrong place at the wrong time. In my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:46 pm
Femmunition Shenco well the question is , do you really think you're government is so twisted and demented to actually detonate two buildings(which were bringing in money since it was the world trade center) , pay someone for the blame, and killing all those people just to start a war? Well first off the us gets about 2000 terrorist threats a day. So they couldn't have possibly taken this seriously. Now Clinton knew they were going to attack, but he didn't get a team to investigate. And the people who hijacked the planes were american citizens for like 10 years. Now I'm not saying the government hasn't doned some horrible s**t, I mean they have staged killings before, but something of this magnitude? I don't think so. But nevertheless I feel the most suspicion when it comes to the pentagon situation. There are usually fighter jets all arouind the pentagon patrolling the airways, but on that day they were supposedly on a test misson? I don't get that, but anyway I'm not defending Bush or anything, but he just got caught at the wrong place at the wrong time and now he's created a bad situation that the next president elect will have to deal with It's possible, but it's also possible for Bush not having been caught at the wrong place at the wrong time. In my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:08 pm
Shenco Femmunition Shenco well the question is , do you really think you're government is so twisted and demented to actually detonate two buildings(which were bringing in money since it was the world trade center) , pay someone for the blame, and killing all those people just to start a war? Well first off the us gets about 2000 terrorist threats a day. So they couldn't have possibly taken this seriously. Now Clinton knew they were going to attack, but he didn't get a team to investigate. And the people who hijacked the planes were american citizens for like 10 years. Now I'm not saying the government hasn't doned some horrible s**t, I mean they have staged killings before, but something of this magnitude? I don't think so. But nevertheless I feel the most suspicion when it comes to the pentagon situation. There are usually fighter jets all arouind the pentagon patrolling the airways, but on that day they were supposedly on a test misson? I don't get that, but anyway I'm not defending Bush or anything, but he just got caught at the wrong place at the wrong time and now he's created a bad situation that the next president elect will have to deal with It's possible, but it's also possible for Bush not having been caught at the wrong place at the wrong time. In my opinion. Lets sit here talking about how the world sucks. Isn't that better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:17 pm
ImShiZZle Shenco Femmunition Shenco well the question is , do you really think you're government is so twisted and demented to actually detonate two buildings(which were bringing in money since it was the world trade center) , pay someone for the blame, and killing all those people just to start a war? Well first off the us gets about 2000 terrorist threats a day. So they couldn't have possibly taken this seriously. Now Clinton knew they were going to attack, but he didn't get a team to investigate. And the people who hijacked the planes were american citizens for like 10 years. Now I'm not saying the government hasn't doned some horrible s**t, I mean they have staged killings before, but something of this magnitude? I don't think so. But nevertheless I feel the most suspicion when it comes to the pentagon situation. There are usually fighter jets all arouind the pentagon patrolling the airways, but on that day they were supposedly on a test misson? I don't get that, but anyway I'm not defending Bush or anything, but he just got caught at the wrong place at the wrong time and now he's created a bad situation that the next president elect will have to deal with It's possible, but it's also possible for Bush not having been caught at the wrong place at the wrong time. In my opinion. Lets sit here talking about how the world sucks. Isn't that better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
