|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:41 am
The battle between the four jedi and the sith lord. Okay, I understand the Sidius is amazing and what not, but they butchered the scene. They made the other jedi's look like trash. There are reasons for this, in the making of the movie which is why it sucks and its anti climatic. Number one, Samuel Jackson looks like s**t when he fights, so they tried to make him look good, by making everyone else look bad. Number two reason, the original scene had the first two Jedi's get caught off guard, like they did and died instantly. But Kit Fisto, the king of badassery was supposed to be in the fight scene for a good 30 seconds before he died. They edited that out, for who knows why. And thus the scene went to s**t. The jedi's, who aren't the main characters look like poo. Thus its gay.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:45 am
Takkan The battle between the four jedi and the sith lord. Okay, I understand the Sidius is amazing and what not, but they butchered the scene. They made the other jedi's look like trash. There are reasons for this, in the making of the movie which is why it sucks and its anti climatic. Number one, Samuel Jackson looks like s**t when he fights, so they tried to make him look good, by making everyone else look bad. Number two reason, the original scene had the first two Jedi's get caught off guard, like they did and died instantly. But Kit Fisto, the king of badassery was supposed to be in the fight scene for a good 30 seconds before he died. They edited that out, for who knows why. And thus the scene went to s**t. The jedi's, who aren't the main characters look like poo. Thus its gay. Sorry for saying this, and, please, don't take it personally, but, cry more. It's just a movie. Sure, I may have things about other films that bug me, but I don't think it ruins the film. I mean, sure, there probably are a lot of movies out there that could have been made better or had more scenes in them to enrich the plot and characters, but in some cases you just don't have the time (um, what I mean by that is that if you add any more, you'll have a Lord of the Rings film on your hands.) Okay, just to clear things up, no, I am NOT saying that that was the case with RotS (even though it did come up to be 2 and a half hours long). Yes, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but your post was, well, whiny and (forgive my language here!) bitchy. If only people could express their frustration in a way that didn't portray them as such . . . That's my issue.
Okay, and, as I said, don't take this personally, please. The last thing I want is to get on the bad side of people. redface [/apology]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:44 am
Moyayuki Takkan The battle between the four jedi and the sith lord. Okay, I understand the Sidius is amazing and what not, but they butchered the scene. They made the other jedi's look like trash. There are reasons for this, in the making of the movie which is why it sucks and its anti climatic. Number one, Samuel Jackson looks like s**t when he fights, so they tried to make him look good, by making everyone else look bad. Number two reason, the original scene had the first two Jedi's get caught off guard, like they did and died instantly. But Kit Fisto, the king of badassery was supposed to be in the fight scene for a good 30 seconds before he died. They edited that out, for who knows why. And thus the scene went to s**t. The jedi's, who aren't the main characters look like poo. Thus its gay. Sorry for saying this, and, please, don't take it personally, but, cry more. It's just a movie. Sure, I may have things about other films that bug me, but I don't think it ruins the film. I mean, sure, there probably are a lot of movies out there that could have been made better or had more scenes in them to enrich the plot and characters, but in some cases you just don't have the time (um, what I mean by that is that if you add any more, you'll have a Lord of the Rings film on your hands.) Okay, just to clear things up, no, I am NOT saying that that was the case with RotS (even though it did come up to be 2 and a half hours long). Yes, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but your post was, well, whiny and (forgive my language here!) bitchy. If only people could express their frustration in a way that didn't portray them as such . . . That's my issue.
Okay, and, as I said, don't take this personally, please. The last thing I want is to get on the bad side of people. redface [/apology]I don't see the point of this post, like you said I stated my opinion, everyone else had their own about which part of the movies was anti-climatic. I don't even understand how I sounded whiny or bitchy, you must have read it wrong. This bewilders me, sorry.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 3:31 am
anti-climatic moment #2
at the end of RotS when luke and leia part their separate ways, luke to tatooine and leia to the organa's on alderaan. i don't like how they did this in the movie, because they didn't really give any background information on why these two couples were chosen to raise the kids. it made the decision seem really rash and not well planned because of how george lucas kind of put it in at the very end on a whim. it wouldn't have taken much to explain why padme chose the organa's (if i remember right it did go into a bit of detail about why owen and beru were chosen to raise luke). anyways i digress.
it just made that scene feel kind of pointless because it only explained half the story of the twins.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 3:27 pm
jasonfehr anti-climatic moment #2 at the end of RotS when luke and leia part their separate ways, luke to tatooine and leia to the organa's on alderaan. i don't like how they did this in the movie, because they didn't really give any background information on why these two couples were chosen to raise the kids. it made the decision seem really rash and not well planned because of how george lucas kind of put it in at the very end on a whim. it wouldn't have taken much to explain why padme chose the organa's (if i remember right it did go into a bit of detail about why owen and beru were chosen to raise luke). anyways i digress. it just made that scene feel kind of pointless because it only explained half the story of the twins. Just for a little bit of clearing up, Obi-Wan, Yoda, and Bail Organa were the ones who discussed what to do with the twins. Bail volunteered to take Leia since he and his wife always wanted to adopt a baby girl (obviously, they must have had trouble making kids of their own rolleyes ) and then Yoda suggested to Obi-Wan that he should take Luke to "his family on Tatooine", seeing as how Owen and Beru were related to Anakin through the marriage of Shmi and Clieg Lars. And, of course, Obi-Wan declares he'll watch over Luke from that moment on.
Yeah, that stuff was explained in that one scene in the film. Hope that clears things up and changes your perspective. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 11:50 pm
it doesn't really change my perspective, thanks. i still think it should've been made more clear in the movie, if i can't remember them explaining it after seeing it quite a few times.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 3:37 pm
I think... Fight beteween Windu and Jango. It was something like:
-Can I kill you? -Ok. *slash*
Ultra skilled Mandalorian Bounty Hunter killed in less than 15 seconds...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 3:57 pm
well the most anti climactic point in any star wars experience i have ever had was, i was watching episode 1, the film as a whole sucked but i love watching maul whirl his glo sticks around. xp
so basicly im wathicn wham bam sheeeeaaarrt wooosh jab jab gwwwwar and he hits him and obi falls 20 stories and jumps back up like nutt'n and qui-gon gets deaded and whir wam shhhertchalks and what not
i was getting so excited i got up out of my chair and started whipping my plastic toys-r-us extendo light-saber
I yelled out "GET EM' OBI GET EM" but i miss stepped tripped on my bathrobe fell and hit my head on a desk... i was out cold..... i woke up in the middle of credits... i was out.
that was anti-climactic
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 2:03 pm
ROFL that would be anticlimactic that death scene with darth maul was pretty shitty this all powerful sith lord was killed with wits
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 2:43 pm
nah, whit is how you kill anything, its not a real battle without it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 7:25 pm
true but i guess i didn't explain it enough, it was a one swipe move across maul's midsection, i was hoping for something a little bit more extreme on his part, based on the other couple battles from the movie
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 9:47 pm
well if you think about it, thats a pretty intense kill for a jedi to make, Obi definitely touched a bit into the dark-side when he did it. I'm not so upset with mauls death, he was a tool and he died by being outsmarted. nothing outraging about that.
good times that fight scene.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 1:56 am
i didn't really think about obi-wan delving in the dark side, that's a really interesting perspective on it. do you think he would've ended up being deceived by darth sidious to join him, had ben not had anakin to train?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 6:13 pm
oh hell no you can't get much more light side than Ben.
Anti Climactic moment: Aayla Secura's death in RotS. She didn't even fight back! just "Oopsie" dead. Kriff that!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:30 pm
one of the most anti-climatic moment was in the 5th episode, at the end, when Luke falls down the vent out of cloud city (just after Darth Vader tells luke that he is Luke's father) Vader just like tilts his head to the side and does not say anything
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|