|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 7:08 pm
Spartan-4202 No offence to our straight allies but: What sancity of marriage? Heterosexual couples have been defiling it since the first adultury, the first divorce, the first domestic violence between spouses. I mean what the F*CK is bush's problem, that damn homophobic bigot! No offense taken, we know that some of our straight bretherin are SERIOUSLY messed up and homophobic...kinda makes us sad to be affiliated....but then again they feel the same way about us! wink
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:44 pm
Fadia Stalyr Spartan-4202 No offence to our straight allies but: What sancity of marriage? Heterosexual couples have been defiling it since the first adultury, the first divorce, the first domestic violence between spouses. I mean what the F*CK is bush's problem, that damn homophobic bigot! No offense taken, we know that some of our straight bretherin are SERIOUSLY messed up and homophobic...kinda makes us sad to be affiliated....but then again they feel the same way about us! wink So true
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 5:14 pm
Tenaku Fadia Stalyr Spartan-4202 No offence to our straight allies but: What sancity of marriage? Heterosexual couples have been defiling it since the first adultury, the first divorce, the first domestic violence between spouses. I mean what the F*CK is bush's problem, that damn homophobic bigot! No offense taken, we know that some of our straight bretherin are SERIOUSLY messed up and homophobic...kinda makes us sad to be affiliated....but then again they feel the same way about us! wink So true *aggrees* No offence taken, and rember were not all homophobic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 5:23 pm
Of course not... just a good chunk of us are... unfortunatly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 6:26 pm
Kohki Of course not... just a good chunk of us are... unfortunatly. i know sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 8:44 pm
Kohki Of course not... just a good chunk of us are... unfortunatly. But that's why this GSA exists! We strive to change all that!....or atleast have it changed by the time all those homophobes are too old to come out with their placards and all that fun stuff! sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 6:52 am
Quote: or atleast have it changed by the time all those homophobes are too old to come out with their placards and all that fun stuff! sweatdrop LMAO thats a good one...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:26 pm
Spartan-4202 Quote: or atleast have it changed by the time all those homophobes are too old to come out with their placards and all that fun stuff! sweatdrop LMAO thats a good one... Yupers blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:10 am
Ok i found some more bulls***: Gay marrage ban passes senate panel stressed Oh BTW if anyone else wants to go looking for this sort of stuff just do a search for anti-gay phrases like "homosexuality is wrong" and such and then google or your chosen searh engne regurgutates this sick up. OH and i've changed the title. And I know this entire guild is based around polotics but i'd thought i'd base this thread on it if thats ok respected crew/captin?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 7:52 am
well this is kinda old news too.. it said it was last updated March 8th. I haven't really heard anything new on our situation with Bush lately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 7:55 am
I did like this tho. Quote: James: Why are you so attached to a word? And incidentally, The DOMA of 1996 officially codified marriage to mean between a man and a woman. By federal statute the word is not available to same sex couples. I am guessing it will never be. Why? Because misguided dogma has somehow decreed that marriage is a sacred god given man woman right. Please. Read your history books. Marriage was a way of subjecting women and accumulating property, and creting power allainaces. For example, the first King of what is now modern Suaid Arabia, married one women from every tribe in the country. He then collected on the marriage debt of all these women and the repspective tribal cheiftans got togethor and made him King, thinking that because he was married to a women of their clan, their clan interests would be served. Modern MArriage is a sham. AND YOU KNOW IT. Stop defending the indefensible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:54 am
neoncode Ok i found some more bulls***: Gay marrage ban passes senate panel stressed Oh BTW if anyone else wants to go looking for this sort of stuff just do a search for anti-gay phrases like "homosexuality is wrong" and such and then google or your chosen searh engne regurgutates this sick up. OH and i''ve changed the title. And I know this entire guild is based around polotics but i''d thought i''d base this thread on it if thats ok respected crew/captin? ^____^ I like the idea. Good work sonny! *hands you a penny to buy some toffee and pats you on the head* Read the article, and I like the thing about the economy. New angle, less biased.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:57 am
AkureiKnight I did like this tho. Quote: James: Why are you so attached to a word? And incidentally, The DOMA of 1996 officially codified marriage to mean between a man and a woman. By federal statute the word is not available to same sex couples. I am guessing it will never be. Why? Because misguided dogma has somehow decreed that marriage is a sacred god given man woman right. Please. Read your history books. Marriage was a way of subjecting women and accumulating property, and creting power allainaces. For example, the first King of what is now modern Suaid Arabia, married one women from every tribe in the country. He then collected on the marriage debt of all these women and the repspective tribal cheiftans got togethor and made him King, thinking that because he was married to a women of their clan, their clan interests would be served. Modern MArriage is a sham. AND YOU KNOW IT. Stop defending the indefensible. Gaw, i hate greedy political leaders and religious zealots! scream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 11:18 am
Spartan-4202 AkureiKnight I did like this tho. Quote: James: Why are you so attached to a word? And incidentally, The DOMA of 1996 officially codified marriage to mean between a man and a woman. By federal statute the word is not available to same sex couples. I am guessing it will never be. Why? Because misguided dogma has somehow decreed that marriage is a sacred god given man woman right. Please. Read your history books. Marriage was a way of subjecting women and accumulating property, and creting power allainaces. For example, the first King of what is now modern Suaid Arabia, married one women from every tribe in the country. He then collected on the marriage debt of all these women and the repspective tribal cheiftans got togethor and made him King, thinking that because he was married to a women of their clan, their clan interests would be served. Modern MArriage is a sham. AND YOU KNOW IT. Stop defending the indefensible. Gaw, i hate greedy political leaders and religious zealots! scream Like George W. Bush? domokun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:54 pm
Ok, new topic: Homo/Bi-Sexual President? Pros? Cons? Just plain weird? Discuss!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
