|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:21 pm
Interesting.
*Is reading through the class stuff.*
So this is basically Battle Royale, only with mythical figures and magical, mystical wizards, rather than japanese highschoolers.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:21 pm
:finally gets around to watching Hajime no Ippo again:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:23 pm
themightyjello So this is basically Battle Royale, only with mythical figures and magical, mystical wizards, rather than japanese highschoolers.
Yeah. Pretty much so.
A great way to sum up the entire thing.
It's not going to be a royal fighting ******** I figure someone will die within two weeks of start.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:33 pm
It's geared for fast eliminations, but not necessarily around everyone just heading for the town square and fighting until the last man standing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:36 pm
This Noble Phantasm thread confuses the hell out of me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:38 pm
Yeah. Owle did not understand that so much I think.
I can answer any questions about it - just ask them in the OOC there. As opposed to further flooding here.
As for eliminations...
Yeah.
The easiest ways to lose are to - (A) FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT or (B) Miss Events.
I'll be doing those at random.
Since fighting in and of itself drains your reserve thus putting you closer to elimination. ...You could actually run the whole time and stand a chance of winning.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:43 pm
Run the whole time and just outlast, since...?
Servants lose 10pts per day. Masters gain 4pts per day. Which means Servants lose 6pts per day.
Which is roughly running for 10 weeks of RP.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:45 pm
Yeah, outlasting is one valid option.
Thus why Dessie better be pretty hardcore. ...Otherwise he will fade in ten weeks most likely.
I suspect the first event thing will at least have two eliminations (Probably a Master/Servant combo). Still not sure exactly what that will be, but it's planning out in my head.
Basically went for the more powerful your Servant class is, the more of a drain they are.
Arguably the weakest servant (Lancer) has the best chance of not *poofing* out of the RP with 4 drain. (If he avoids excess drain he basically cant poof.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:46 pm
I think it would help if... y'know... you actually explained what the hell the things are in that thread. The other threads seemed pretty self-explanatory, but that one uses a lot of non-defined terms like Anti-Fort.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:48 pm
'kay. I'll go do that now.
Owle brought up that exact same example.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:49 pm
:just watched the Otters holding hands video:
heart
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:49 pm
WAR IS PEACE.
Guess why I made a reference to that whole Big Brother is watching thang and you shall be rewarded!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:50 pm
Well, rules are read, and I'll check back on that when you finish refurbishing it.
Now I read the Servant Class Information, despite that I've already pretty much decided what I'm going to pick.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:57 pm
I explained it a bit better, but there might still be some questions.
I suggest just asking me directly on messengers or something. It's the fastest way to get a response and some people's situations will differ.
EDIT:
And you need a master before you can play if you are a servant. Wow that sounds weird.
But right now I'm the only listed one.
I originally figured that I would get Servant's filled up before Master's anyway.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:57 pm
Nothing like dislocating a finger then cracking it back into place by tensing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|