Welcome to Gaia! ::

The Official Warhammer 40,000 and Tabletop Gaming Guild

Back to Guilds

The Official Gaian Home of Tabletop Gaming 

Tags: Games Workshop, Tabletop, Warhammer, Gaming, Wargaming 

Reply 40k Discussion
The Imperial Guard Goto Page: [] [<<] [<<] [<] 1 2 3 ... 195 196 197 198 199 200 ... 393 394 395 396 [>] [>>] [>>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Nuclearwinter

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:16 pm


Xenos Mortium
Van Evok
that comissar dude from FW is absolutely cool... but I hate comissars as they seem to kill off every officer they "advise"... here goes my beloved colonel because of botched ld test sad
I have never had an officer with a Commissar fail a leadership test. In fact, I have nothing but good things to say about my Commissars.



Intresting thing happened with my 'Officer-Commisar relationship' recently. I've never needed to have my commanding officer executed for cowardice ever in a game. Except for one recent occasion.

In a game I was playing against the dark eldar (which, by the way, I mucked up right in the begining) had the remains of an infanty platoon in a firerce close combat with an unit of witches.

Now my officer, not to be outdone by a bunch of elves (elven women, no less), decided to take matters into his own hands. a glorious charge insued with all of the command squad being wiped out, save for my officer and his regimental commisar. Being little pissed off at this point, the heroic duo wasted not another second beofore beating the enemy witch lord into paste with their combined attacks.

I was quite proud of myself at this point, my guardsmen were holding their own and my officers even killed an enemy HQ!

Unfortunatly, there were still many witches left and enough dead guardsmen to give them the victory over the combat. For whatever reason, the firey zeal that had been fueling my commander this far into the game decided to extinguish at this very moment, and i failed his leadership test. With the company banner laying in 3 pieces (and it's bearer in many more) , there was no hope for my commander and he was summarily executed by the regimental commisar, even as he was still fighting off a witch in close combat (the crafty b*****d)

The commisar did not last much longer however, and was soon over run by next turn.

This was the only time my commander had ever been executed, but given the circumstances I'd have had it no other way!
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:20 pm


A brave a hearty tale my radioactive comrade!
My only recent battle with the Kassarine 114th was ranged bombardment against some 'Nids and Marines with my tanks(I LOVE THE MACHARIUS!) before finishing them off with my Sturmgarten.

Tech Magos Sejanus


Nuclearwinter

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:28 pm


Tech Magos Sejanus
A brave a hearty tale my radioactive comrade!
My only recent battle with the Kassarine 114th was ranged bombardment against some 'Nids and Marines with my tanks(I LOVE THE MACHARIUS!) before finishing them off with my Sturmgarten.


very nice, and I saw your post before about loving the red army. you'll probally LOVE this fun fact:

if you wanted to have a regiment of conscripts in one of the new apocolypse 40k games you can get a MINIMUM of about 600 conscripts and 11 indipendent commisars to lead each squad (giving them LD 10, re-rollable if he has a trademark item) in a standard 3000 point game!!

THAT'S AWSOME no matter which way you put it!

Put some tank support in there and you have your self one awsome Red Army.


I suppose the only real problem is having to deploy, move and transport 600+ models. but hey, that's the guard for ya.
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:44 pm


Too bad Vostroyans and Valhallans are expensive as hell. If not, I'd do that just for the satisfaction of throwing what might as well be the actual Red Army at the enemy.
Even though conscripts rarely do even anything at all, I can see six hundred being a pretty reliable source of death. And I imagine an army of that size will annihilate any deployment zone possible. It would be awesome.
Fun for everyone!

Tech Magos Sejanus


Hoxtalicious

Greedy Partner

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 5:48 am


Why do you stupid gnats of idiots always assume that the Red Army is made up entirely of conscripts and peasants who never held a rifle before?
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:56 am


War stories, vets, and Hollywood. I know enough about it, I just don't care to play a historically accurate army in Warhammer. Much funner to watch the Enemy at the Gates than to see the actual atrocities that were committed during the Battle for Stalingrad.
Though it is true very few soldiers got rifles, but many did have eperience.

Tech Magos Sejanus


ExLibrisMortis

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:49 am


Emphasis of the Red Army was No retreat, and snipers are for the win. They also followed Lenin's philosophy of, "Sure, quality is better than quantity, but quantity has a quality of its own." This would in fact lead many people to believe that they mainly took people out of the farms and villages and gave them a rifle and said,"Charge or get shot!". The thing about that, a lot of it was true. In dire circumstance like Stalingrad, many men were taken right of the refugee trains and given a uniform and told to run at the enemy. Think of that opening scene of Enemy at the Gates, that right there is not far from the truth. A huge majority of russian victories came from human waves and just sheer numbers. Granted that the ruskies had amazing units and crack teams, just the amount of basic infantry and conscripts would totally outnumber this, giving the common citizen nowadays to think on the side of, "Russian won by numbers, plain and simple."

*throws in 2 cents*
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:45 am


ahem, Russian doctrines would imho be:
conscripts
independent comissars (to keep conscripts in line)
veterans (survivors of previous battles)
special weapon squads (for snipers)
heavy weapon platoons (for massive numbers of antitank weapons - Guderian once commented that every Russian soldier seems to have antitank gun- and also for mortars)

Van Evok

Dangerous Hunter

8,550 Points
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Signature Look 250
  • Person of Interest 200

Nuclearwinter

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:54 pm


Lt. Brookman
Why do you stupid gnats of idiots always assume that the Red Army is made up entirely of conscripts and peasants who never held a rifle before?



I never said that was all of them.

If I did make a red army I'd love include hoards of tanks, artillery, snipers, machinegun heavy weapon platoons and planes. (and mabey a few platoons of reguar guardsmen)

I know full well what the red army had that made them damn powerful, why do you have to assume you know more than somone just because they didn't include every minute detail? (sorry to sound cocky there, but I'm tired of having to write a history essay in my posts to avoid being called an idiot, it dosn't happen just here)


But seriously, who DOSN'T want to re-inact the battle of Stalingrad 40k style?
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:22 pm


*calls down the power of Godwin's Law*
Nazis.
And I gotta go with Nuclearwinter. Everywhere on Gaia has suddenly become full of a**l-retentive asshats who want you to spill every drop of knowledge you have about a subject, with reliable sources, when you so much as mention anything and yet do not expect you to ask the same of them.
So: Nyet! Kakpyet zat Putin!

Tech Magos Sejanus


Heretic_Inquisitor

PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:24 pm


This may be addressed somewhere, but if you create a traitor Guard army (not LATD), may you take Daemons or Chaos Marines or anything of the sort along with them, or does it have to be entirely Guard?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:55 pm


Heretic_Inquisitor
This may be addressed somewhere, but if you create a traitor Guard army (not LATD), may you take Daemons or Chaos Marines or anything of the sort along with them, or does it have to be entirely Guard?



I'm pretty sure you can with the apocolypse rules, but not sure for anything else.

Nuclearwinter


Nuclearwinter

PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:28 pm


I'VE DONE IT!!!!! i have made converted rough riders so that they are on bikes!!!! (pictures soon perhaps)

I

AM



GOD!!!!
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:29 pm


Well ********.. I write about the concept of a Baneblade using its autocannon as a ranging tool for sighting the main gun, much like the British Centurion tank and a week later GW publishes the rules for their Baneblade coaxial mount rules. If one or more coaxial shots hit before you fire the main gun you get to re-roll any misses.

I hate it when my ideas are not as original as I thought them to be crying

Hoxtalicious

Greedy Partner


DarkElf27
Captain

Familiar Guildsman

11,250 Points
  • Guildmember 100
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:38 pm


I know how you feel, man. razz
Reply
40k Discussion

Goto Page: [] [<<] [<<] [<] 1 2 3 ... 195 196 197 198 199 200 ... 393 394 395 396 [>] [>>] [>>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum