|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:47 am
Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren I don't know, she had that evil tone in her voice when she spoke about it, then again she was evil. but when you want to kill someone because they killed your family, I think that' aggression enough lol. lol yeah, well according to my archives, it was like chris was doing his on investication and it turned out to be Jill who saved him from the cell after Wesker got him, i think that's how it was written out in the synopsis, then again it's been a while since i read that segment of the archives. For all we know she could have just been looking for an excuse to kill. You'd think that since playing as Chris is much tougher then playing as Jill you'd think it would be him. lol I don't know. Yeah, that would make since since you had to back track with him more than Jill lol. Have less space, don't get as much help, don't get a gernade launcher, and list goes on. lol yeah. Rebecca doesn't help him much. Other then Plant 42. And then Chris makes a pun that to be honest made me want to let him die.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:48 am
battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren I don't know, she had that evil tone in her voice when she spoke about it, then again she was evil. but when you want to kill someone because they killed your family, I think that' aggression enough lol. lol yeah, well according to my archives, it was like chris was doing his on investication and it turned out to be Jill who saved him from the cell after Wesker got him, i think that's how it was written out in the synopsis, then again it's been a while since i read that segment of the archives. For all we know she could have just been looking for an excuse to kill. You'd think that since playing as Chris is much tougher then playing as Jill you'd think it would be him. lol I don't know. Yeah, that would make since since you had to back track with him more than Jill lol. Have less space, don't get as much help, don't get a gernade launcher, and list goes on. lol yeah. Rebecca doesn't help him much. Other then Plant 42. And then Chris makes a pun that to be honest made me want to let him die. lol what was the pun he made?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:52 am
Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren lol I don't know. Yeah, that would make since since you had to back track with him more than Jill lol. Have less space, don't get as much help, don't get a gernade launcher, and list goes on. lol yeah. Rebecca doesn't help him much. Other then Plant 42. And then Chris makes a pun that to be honest made me want to let him die. lol what was the pun he made? Looks like we got to the... ROOT of the problem.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:53 am
battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren lol I don't know. Yeah, that would make since since you had to back track with him more than Jill lol. Have less space, don't get as much help, don't get a gernade launcher, and list goes on. lol yeah. Rebecca doesn't help him much. Other then Plant 42. And then Chris makes a pun that to be honest made me want to let him die. lol what was the pun he made? Looks like we got to the... ROOT of the problem. lol I see, I don't remember that. I think I killed the plant in a different way.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:26 pm
Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Rebecca doesn't help him much. Other then Plant 42. And then Chris makes a pun that to be honest made me want to let him die. lol what was the pun he made? Looks like we got to the... ROOT of the problem. lol I see, I don't remember that. I think I killed the plant in a different way. Mybe. Word of advice. Don't see Silent House. Its really bad.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:34 pm
battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Rebecca doesn't help him much. Other then Plant 42. And then Chris makes a pun that to be honest made me want to let him die. lol what was the pun he made? Looks like we got to the... ROOT of the problem. lol I see, I don't remember that. I think I killed the plant in a different way. Mybe. Word of advice. Don't see Silent House. Its really bad. oh why's that? what was it that was bad?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:46 pm
Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren lol what was the pun he made? Looks like we got to the... ROOT of the problem. lol I see, I don't remember that. I think I killed the plant in a different way. Mybe. Word of advice. Don't see Silent House. Its really bad. oh why's that? what was it that was bad? Pretty much everything but the acting. Nothing was explained, these pictures are built up to be something that may explain everything but we can only make one out because the camera moves to fast to make any of the others out and they don't really explain anything, there were no scares, I feel like the movie was trying to blind me because it had a polorid camera flashing out of nowhere in one scene, the characters seemed like morons, the camerman was obbseesed with close-up shots of the actors or holding on something that it shouldn't like hodling on a door for about 10 seconds or is pointing the camera at the ground, sometimes everything but the actor closest to the camera was blurry, you never really care for the characters because they don't seem to have a personilaty, the whole movie is about symbolism and most of it makes no sense, the "Stalker Man" as the movie calls him you never see other then is camo outfit but thats usally obsecered by the fact that most shots of him are in the dark so you can't make anything out about him, theres little diolauge other then screaming, there was little music when there were it didn't seem to add to the tense or anything, the movie is mainly jump scares but even those are rare, theres little blood, and did I mention it made no sense? I could go on but I'll stop with that short list. You should have asked what was right with it. That'd be the shorter anwser.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:02 pm
battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren lol what was the pun he made? Looks like we got to the... ROOT of the problem. lol I see, I don't remember that. I think I killed the plant in a different way. Mybe. Word of advice. Don't see Silent House. Its really bad. oh why's that? what was it that was bad? Pretty much everything but the acting. Nothing was explained, these pictures are built up to be something that may explain everything but we can only make one out because the camera moves to fast to make any of the others out and they don't really explain anything, there were no scares, I feel like the movie was trying to blind me because it had a polorid camera flashing out of nowhere in one scene, the characters seemed like morons, the camerman was obbseesed with close-up shots of the actors or holding on something that it shouldn't like hodling on a door for about 10 seconds or is pointing the camera at the ground, sometimes everything but the actor closest to the camera was blurry, you never really care for the characters because they don't seem to have a personilaty, the whole movie is about symbolism and most of it makes no sense, the "Stalker Man" as the movie calls him you never see other then is camo outfit but thats usally obsecered by the fact that most shots of him are in the dark so you can't make anything out about him, theres little diolauge other then screaming, there was little music when there were it didn't seem to add to the tense or anything, the movie is mainly jump scares but even those are rare, theres little blood, and did I mention it made no sense? I could go on but I'll stop with that short list. You should have asked what was right with it. That'd be the shorter anwser. I heard it was suppose to be based off of an acctual event though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:09 pm
Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren lol I see, I don't remember that. I think I killed the plant in a different way. Mybe. Word of advice. Don't see Silent House. Its really bad. oh why's that? what was it that was bad? Pretty much everything but the acting. Nothing was explained, these pictures are built up to be something that may explain everything but we can only make one out because the camera moves to fast to make any of the others out and they don't really explain anything, there were no scares, I feel like the movie was trying to blind me because it had a polorid camera flashing out of nowhere in one scene, the characters seemed like morons, the camerman was obbseesed with close-up shots of the actors or holding on something that it shouldn't like hodling on a door for about 10 seconds or is pointing the camera at the ground, sometimes everything but the actor closest to the camera was blurry, you never really care for the characters because they don't seem to have a personilaty, the whole movie is about symbolism and most of it makes no sense, the "Stalker Man" as the movie calls him you never see other then is camo outfit but thats usally obsecered by the fact that most shots of him are in the dark so you can't make anything out about him, theres little diolauge other then screaming, there was little music when there were it didn't seem to add to the tense or anything, the movie is mainly jump scares but even those are rare, theres little blood, and did I mention it made no sense? I could go on but I'll stop with that short list. You should have asked what was right with it. That'd be the shorter anwser. I heard it was suppose to be based off of an acctual event though. Ya I heard that to. Doesn't stop a movie from being bad. Also its a remake of, I belive, a spanish film.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:12 pm
battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren lol I see, I don't remember that. I think I killed the plant in a different way. Mybe. Word of advice. Don't see Silent House. Its really bad. oh why's that? what was it that was bad? Pretty much everything but the acting. Nothing was explained, these pictures are built up to be something that may explain everything but we can only make one out because the camera moves to fast to make any of the others out and they don't really explain anything, there were no scares, I feel like the movie was trying to blind me because it had a polorid camera flashing out of nowhere in one scene, the characters seemed like morons, the camerman was obbseesed with close-up shots of the actors or holding on something that it shouldn't like hodling on a door for about 10 seconds or is pointing the camera at the ground, sometimes everything but the actor closest to the camera was blurry, you never really care for the characters because they don't seem to have a personilaty, the whole movie is about symbolism and most of it makes no sense, the "Stalker Man" as the movie calls him you never see other then is camo outfit but thats usally obsecered by the fact that most shots of him are in the dark so you can't make anything out about him, theres little diolauge other then screaming, there was little music when there were it didn't seem to add to the tense or anything, the movie is mainly jump scares but even those are rare, theres little blood, and did I mention it made no sense? I could go on but I'll stop with that short list. You should have asked what was right with it. That'd be the shorter anwser. I heard it was suppose to be based off of an acctual event though. Ya I heard that to. Doesn't stop a movie from being bad. Also its a remake of, I belive, a spanish film. Oh I see. do you know the nam of that spanish movie?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:17 pm
Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren oh why's that? what was it that was bad? Pretty much everything but the acting. Nothing was explained, these pictures are built up to be something that may explain everything but we can only make one out because the camera moves to fast to make any of the others out and they don't really explain anything, there were no scares, I feel like the movie was trying to blind me because it had a polorid camera flashing out of nowhere in one scene, the characters seemed like morons, the camerman was obbseesed with close-up shots of the actors or holding on something that it shouldn't like hodling on a door for about 10 seconds or is pointing the camera at the ground, sometimes everything but the actor closest to the camera was blurry, you never really care for the characters because they don't seem to have a personilaty, the whole movie is about symbolism and most of it makes no sense, the "Stalker Man" as the movie calls him you never see other then is camo outfit but thats usally obsecered by the fact that most shots of him are in the dark so you can't make anything out about him, theres little diolauge other then screaming, there was little music when there were it didn't seem to add to the tense or anything, the movie is mainly jump scares but even those are rare, theres little blood, and did I mention it made no sense? I could go on but I'll stop with that short list. You should have asked what was right with it. That'd be the shorter anwser. I heard it was suppose to be based off of an acctual event though. Ya I heard that to. Doesn't stop a movie from being bad. Also its a remake of, I belive, a spanish film. Oh I see. do you know the nam of that spanish movie? La Casa Muda. Oh and heres some info I just picked up on it. The Silent House (Spanish: La Casa Muda) is an Uruguayan Spanish-language horror film released in 2010. The film is supposedly inspired by real events that took place in the 1940s, but no information can be found to authenticate the claims.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:22 pm
battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren oh why's that? what was it that was bad? Pretty much everything but the acting. Nothing was explained, these pictures are built up to be something that may explain everything but we can only make one out because the camera moves to fast to make any of the others out and they don't really explain anything, there were no scares, I feel like the movie was trying to blind me because it had a polorid camera flashing out of nowhere in one scene, the characters seemed like morons, the camerman was obbseesed with close-up shots of the actors or holding on something that it shouldn't like hodling on a door for about 10 seconds or is pointing the camera at the ground, sometimes everything but the actor closest to the camera was blurry, you never really care for the characters because they don't seem to have a personilaty, the whole movie is about symbolism and most of it makes no sense, the "Stalker Man" as the movie calls him you never see other then is camo outfit but thats usally obsecered by the fact that most shots of him are in the dark so you can't make anything out about him, theres little diolauge other then screaming, there was little music when there were it didn't seem to add to the tense or anything, the movie is mainly jump scares but even those are rare, theres little blood, and did I mention it made no sense? I could go on but I'll stop with that short list. You should have asked what was right with it. That'd be the shorter anwser. I heard it was suppose to be based off of an acctual event though. Ya I heard that to. Doesn't stop a movie from being bad. Also its a remake of, I belive, a spanish film. Oh I see. do you know the nam of that spanish movie? La Casa Muda. Oh and heres some info I just picked up on it. The Silent House (Spanish: La Casa Muda) is an Uruguayan Spanish-language horror film released in 2010. The film is supposedly inspired by real events that took place in the 1940s, but no information can be found to authenticate the claims. lol Oh I see. ^^
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:32 pm
Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren I heard it was suppose to be based off of an acctual event though. Ya I heard that to. Doesn't stop a movie from being bad. Also its a remake of, I belive, a spanish film. Oh I see. do you know the nam of that spanish movie? La Casa Muda. Oh and heres some info I just picked up on it. The Silent House (Spanish: La Casa Muda) is an Uruguayan Spanish-language horror film released in 2010. The film is supposedly inspired by real events that took place in the 1940s, but no information can be found to authenticate the claims. lol Oh I see. ^^ With a budget of just six thousand dollars, it was filmed using a handheld high-definition digital single-lens reflex camera (the Canon EOS 5D Mark II) over a period of just four days. La Casa Muda was shot to look like it was in real time in one continuous 78 minute take. I can't remeber if the remake did that but it might have.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:34 pm
battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren I heard it was suppose to be based off of an acctual event though. Ya I heard that to. Doesn't stop a movie from being bad. Also its a remake of, I belive, a spanish film. Oh I see. do you know the nam of that spanish movie? La Casa Muda. Oh and heres some info I just picked up on it. The Silent House (Spanish: La Casa Muda) is an Uruguayan Spanish-language horror film released in 2010. The film is supposedly inspired by real events that took place in the 1940s, but no information can be found to authenticate the claims. lol Oh I see. ^^ With a budget of just six thousand dollars, it was filmed using a handheld high-definition digital single-lens reflex camera (the Canon EOS 5D Mark II) over a period of just four days. La Casa Muda was shot to look like it was in real time in one continuous 78 minute take. I can't remeber if the remake did that but it might have. oh i see, well I wouldn't know lol. I've never seen either of them, but sounds about right.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:38 pm
Siefren battosai matt Siefren battosai matt Siefren Oh I see. do you know the nam of that spanish movie? La Casa Muda. Oh and heres some info I just picked up on it. The Silent House (Spanish: La Casa Muda) is an Uruguayan Spanish-language horror film released in 2010. The film is supposedly inspired by real events that took place in the 1940s, but no information can be found to authenticate the claims. lol Oh I see. ^^ With a budget of just six thousand dollars, it was filmed using a handheld high-definition digital single-lens reflex camera (the Canon EOS 5D Mark II) over a period of just four days. La Casa Muda was shot to look like it was in real time in one continuous 78 minute take. I can't remeber if the remake did that but it might have. oh i see, well I wouldn't know lol. I've never seen either of them, but sounds about right. Mybe the orginal was better but good god was this one bad. I bet if me and the freinds,and a few others, who watched it with me could make a better horror movie than this.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|