|
|
| Which control scheme are you using? |
| Wiimote |
|
6% |
[ 9 ] |
| Wiimote + Nunchuk |
|
27% |
[ 39 ] |
| Classic Controller |
|
10% |
[ 15 ] |
| GameCube controller |
|
55% |
[ 77 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:47 am
Denko Sauvie Meta_Fish Sauvie, I think you're just disagreeing to disagree. Everytime we get something to hype over that maybe doesn't peak your interest, it's a gimmick, or it's stupid. No I am not just disagreeing to disagree, I think that this character could be screwed up, and I hope that I am wrong, and come on you're kidding me you dont think a character in the back who swaps movesets in the form of three different pokemon isnt a little gimmicky? and its not stupid... it is kind of out there, but so is G&W and Ice Climbers Do you really think Sakurai could screw anything up? That's just not Nintendo code.I have never, ever doubted Nintendo before. XD quite a few Wii titles would care to disagree In my opinion
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:49 am
Meta_Fish Sauvie No I am not just disagreeing to disagree, I think that this character could be screwed up, and I hope that I am wrong, and come on you're kidding me you dont think a character in the back who swaps movesets in the form of three different pokemon isnt a little gimmicky? and its not stupid... it is kind of out there, but so is G&W and Ice Climbers It's just that every time something comes up that doesn't directly appeal to you, you seem to not like it, and then never shut up about it. I guess it's gimmicky, but gimmicks aren't necessarily a bad thing. Ice Climbers, Zelda/Shiek, hell every Super Smash Brothers character is a gimmick in one way or another. That's what sets them apart from one another. Amen to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:49 am
Meta_Fish Sauvie No I am not just disagreeing to disagree, I think that this character could be screwed up, and I hope that I am wrong, and come on you're kidding me you dont think a character in the back who swaps movesets in the form of three different pokemon isnt a little gimmicky? and its not stupid... it is kind of out there, but so is G&W and Ice Climbers It's just that every time something comes up that doesn't directly appeal to you, you seem to not like it, and then never shut up about it. I guess it's gimmicky, but gimmicks aren't necessarily a bad thing. Ice Climbers, Zelda/Shiek, hell every Super Smash Brothers character is a gimmick in one way or another. That's what sets them apart from one another. Care to inform me what other updates I have "never shut up about"? so I can maybe try and make a case here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:51 am
Sorry Sauvie, I didn't mean for my posts to come off as me being angry with you. You have an opinion, I respect it. You just caught me in a moment of Pokemon love.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:52 am
I thought of another thing, how does he use Items?
Pokémon Trainer: "I got a Franklin Badge!!!!"
Also, poké balls,
Pokémon Trainer: I choose you! Squirtle!
Squirtle: Screw this! I choose you Blastoise!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:53 am
I remember saying Ash would be a cool character once, but no, everyone said "NAH NEVER."
Well, in ur faycez. ):<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:53 am
Eggs.com I thought of another thing, how does he use Items? Pokémon Trainer: "I got a Franklin Badge!!!!" I'm thinking maybe the current Pokemon will hold the items and when a Pokemon switches, the items go to that Pokemon if they're still holding one. Maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:53 am
Denko Sorry Sauvie, I didn't mean for my posts to come off as me being angry with you. You have an opinion, I respect it. You just caught me in a moment of Pokemon love. Nah its no big deal, its just my opinionated side likes to shine when I am in conversation xd Hey You have your opinions as well, I should shut my mouth a bit more from now on (<--- that will trigger something) Hey I would be going nuts if Diddy or Dixie were shown sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:55 am
Waynebrizzle I remember saying Ash would be a cool character once, but no, everyone said "NAH NEVER." Well, in ur faycez. ):< Now we see how they can make him a character. XD But I'm thinking that's not Ash, that's Red. Ash was in the Pokemon anime, and Red was what they called him in Pokemon Red/Blue. Red matches "Pokemon Trainer" more closely so I think it's him and not Ash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:55 am
Sauvie, you just disagree with popular opinion to be different a lot. That's all I'm saying, and now I'm going to go play Viewtiful Joe (who should also be a character)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:58 am
Meta_Fish Sauvie, you just disagree with popular opinion to be different a lot. That's all I'm saying, and now I'm going to go play Viewtiful Joe (who should also be a character) Hey that is most of the time a complete coincidence and so what I am opinionated? Yes Viewtiful Joe would be awesome
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:08 am
Denko Waynebrizzle I remember saying Ash would be a cool character once, but no, everyone said "NAH NEVER." Well, in ur faycez. ):< Now we see how they can make him a character. XD But I'm thinking that's not Ash, that's Red. Ash was in the Pokemon anime, and Red was what they called him in Pokemon Red/Blue. Red matches "Pokemon Trainer" more closely so I think it's him and not Ash. Ash would look like a douche with a crap jacket and lame pants. With a Pikachu. This guy = Not Ash, but this guy = Red.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:10 am
Hero Maul Denko Waynebrizzle I remember saying Ash would be a cool character once, but no, everyone said "NAH NEVER." Well, in ur faycez. ):< Now we see how they can make him a character. XD But I'm thinking that's not Ash, that's Red. Ash was in the Pokemon anime, and Red was what they called him in Pokemon Red/Blue. Red matches "Pokemon Trainer" more closely so I think it's him and not Ash. Ash would look like a douche with a crap jacket and lame pants. With a Pikachu. This guy = Not Ash, but this guy = Red. I found proof because I wanted to convince myself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_(Pokémon)"Ash Ketchum, the main character of the anime, is loosely based on Red, but is a distinct character." EDIT: Argh, if that link doesn't work then just search Red on wikipedia. He's very close to the bottom of the results page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:36 am
Sauvie Hey that is most of the time a complete coincidence and so what I am opinionated? I'm just saying it's interesting that you always tell me that I'm bitching and whining about things, yet I find that you do it as much if not more sometimes. There's being opinionated, and there's going too far. "Sonic? I don't like Sonic, don't put him in the game, because it would taint it for me." "Pokemon Trainer? That's a gimmick." I'm not the only one that notices this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:29 am
What the hell didnt see that coming?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
