|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problematic briefcase Crew
|
 Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:44 pm
Supersephiroth7 Shiny Gligar Supersephiroth7 Shiny Gligar Cabron LaSwan I didn't see you much today/yesterday either Shigar. And I know you've been around because I've seen you on Skype. (In fact, I don't even think I was aware you were playing until now.) What's your excuse? I haven't been aware of anyone acting or saying anything suspicious. Also I kind of don't want to say anything that could be seen as sneaky. p: First day lynch's are usually a random kill, and I didn't want to be too much of a target, we usually always kill a Townie too. Of course, posting a bit more would also make me less of a target, but I want to actually post things that can contribute to Town. Like, I'm suspicious of Betty. You said you talked with him and you both agreed on voting Wylr, but Betty himself said that it was a gut action. I mean, I could understand if he didn't want to look whipped, but it looks kinda suspicious if your stories don't exactly match. Although I can understand him going on a gut instinct. I'd be more suspicious if he seemed more adamant about voting Wylr, because then I could assume he was part of the Mafia. The mafia don't have to be worried about participating in the Town lynching. Even then, it's just a little suspicion because he didn't say the same thing you said. Nothing I'd vote on because it doesn't scream Mafia. Why didn't you mention this earlier? Am I the only one that finds this statement slightly contradictory? Well, with this big of a wall of text, I'm going to wind up getting people confused by the end of it. :'3 I pointed out that I was lurking. I noticed some odd things, but other facts about it made me not so suspicious about it anymore. You claim that mafia members shouldn't be too worried about voting, but then you claim to lurk. That's what I was getting at, but it seems like you don't understand what I'm saying. It seems like you're digging yourself a hole to me. I'm sure I didn't say they shouldn't be worried. I think everyone should lurk a bit more too though. I mean, why would either party want to just vote all willy-nilly? D: I mean, sure the mafia can do it, but then they're in danger. The town can do it, but they have a greater chance of lynching a townie because of the ratio. I'm being cautious. You can't run into this game with your d**k in your hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:46 pm
Sweet Amber Lynne Cabron LaSwan Sweet Amber Lynne from what ive seen so far i understand why nits would look suspicious from just lurking, but isnt that what a few people have done? not saying i agree with what hes doing because it doesn't help us figure out whos mafia if no one is posting. what i want to know is why all of a sudden betman says also a vote for ton and then without any reasoning j of the wind votes ton. was Betmans a real vote? If I read it correctly, Max wasn't voting, he was correcting my vote count since I left out the vote on Ton. You vote in red or bold, so... o ok thank-you for clarifying hun so then j just voted for ton without any reasoning? We were all suspicious of him earlier. I kinda still am, but there are bigger fish to fry atm, like people who have barely contributed anything all day attempting to capitalize on that suspicion half an hour before the day ends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:47 pm
I find Shigar pretty suspicious.Vote Shigar.
FoS: J
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:47 pm
Shiny Gligar You can't run into this game with your d**k in your hand. Now imagining someone attempting to run with their d**k in their hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:47 pm
J of The Wind Supersephiroth7 This. I still don't believe your innocent act. It seems to me like you're joining on the bandwagon. A Bandwagon of 2 people including myself? The BANDWAGON here is on Nitz, which, may I now point ouut, Swyff just joined. :T I was not joing the bandwagon at all. I had my eye on Nitz before I had even left for work. Many people were not on and I just put my vote since it was a gut feeling from before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:48 pm
Swyff misternitsua Swyff I am going to go with my gut of earlier before I left for work Vote NitzCare to explain? Well it all started from the inactivity of last night when you didn't show much. There could have been one more kill and it was inactive. I just don't see how you could forget the game had started. Then today you were hardly on. I was working so that was room for my absence of not being on. Makes sense. It's not correct, but I understand the logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:49 pm
Cabron LaSwan J of The Wind Of Course I'll throw suspicion off of myself What SS7 said made no sense! D: There was no real Ton Bandwagon, just FOS' I changed my focusfrom Bet and more on what Ton said the day he voted to off Wylr. Why would a man on the immediate chopping block NOT get defensive, especially with non-sensical First day logic? 
If the allegation made no sense, why would you assume you're on the immediate chopping block 'cause of one vote? What are you trying to protect?I wasn't referring to me, I was reffering to Ton's reasoning for voting Wylr who was on the chopping block, hun. My death isn't a concern. :T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:49 pm
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:50 pm
Cabron LaSwan Shiny Gligar You can't run into this game with your d**k in your hand. Now imagining someone attempting to run with their d**k in their hand. I did. It was hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:50 pm
l-Kathulu-l Nitz - 4
Ton - 2
Etty - 1
Shigar - 2 10 minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:52 pm
J of The Wind Cabron LaSwan J of The Wind Of Course I'll throw suspicion off of myself What SS7 said made no sense! D: There was no real Ton Bandwagon, just FOS' I changed my focusfrom Bet and more on what Ton said the day he voted to off Wylr. Why would a man on the immediate chopping block NOT get defensive, especially with non-sensical First day logic?
If the allegation made no sense, why would you assume you're on the immediate chopping block 'cause of one vote? What are you trying to protect?I wasn't referring to me, I was reffering to Ton's reasoning for voting Wylr who was on the chopping block, hun. My death isn't a concern. :T Remember how I said I'd move on if I got no reaction?
Yeah, it's not working because I've already seen a reaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:52 pm
Nitz, unless you have any last minute insight for your persecutors... You may be walking that dusty trail. D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:53 pm
THERE'LL BE A FIRE IN THE SKY
AND YOUR DOOM
WILL REIGN DOWN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:53 pm
l-Kathulu-l l-Kathulu-l Nitz - 4
Ton - 2
Etty - 1
Shigar - 2 10 minutes My vote's on J now, not Nitz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:56 pm
l-Kathulu-l Nitz - 3
Ton - 2
J - 1
Etty - 1
Shigar - 2 5 minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
