|
|
| Who is better in bed? |
| Skinn Chicks |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Fat chicks |
|
59% |
[ 53 ] |
| In-between chicks |
|
40% |
[ 36 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 3:22 pm
Fine, teh girls may like wangs, but I like bewbs.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:34 pm
Of course big girls are better in bed! Just like we know how to savour a good meal, we know how to treat a man. You've got to take your time...
And besides, who wants to be rubbing against bones and *angles* all night long? Soft sultry curves are where it's at, wouldn't you agree?
Also...big girls know how to throw themselves into sensual enjoyment. Yep..I'm a loud one, I'll admit it... I just love totally giving myself over to the sensation. 3nodding
P.S. I bow down to the all-powerful wang!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:47 pm
MangaJoe Fine, teh girls may like wangs, but I like bewbs. ever so articulate xd i like bewbies heart . i no likey "de wang" xd 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 7:58 pm
Aeriell Of course big girls are better in bed! Just like we know how to savour a good meal, we know how to treat a man. You've got to take your time... And besides, who wants to be rubbing against bones and *angles* all night long? Soft sultry curves are where it's at, wouldn't you agree? Also...big girls know how to throw themselves into sensual enjoyment. Yep..I'm a loud one, I'll admit it... I just love totally giving myself over to the sensation. 3nodding P.S. I bow down to the all-powerful wang! Hmm.. good point, besides skinny chicks suck, who's the all poerful wang?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:06 pm
My fiancee of course. A mighty, mighty wang has he.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:11 pm
Aeriell My fiancee of course. A mighty, mighty wang has he. Have you read the previous posts, um... I'm no trying to out do anyone but I was hoping I get a title like that, but saddley no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:26 pm
MangaJoe Aeriell Of course big girls are better in bed! Just like we know how to savour a good meal, we know how to treat a man. You've got to take your time... And besides, who wants to be rubbing against bones and *angles* all night long? Soft sultry curves are where it's at, wouldn't you agree? Also...big girls know how to throw themselves into sensual enjoyment. Yep..I'm a loud one, I'll admit it... I just love totally giving myself over to the sensation. 3nodding P.S. I bow down to the all-powerful wang! Hmm.. good point, besides skinny chicks suck, \ That's not very nice. stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:28 pm
*goes back to read a bit*
Wow! A foot and two, eh? Must be difficult jogging...
My fiancee is 9 inches hard, pretty much normal flaccid.. (Sorry if I'm giving out TMI sweatdrop ) But he's just *perfect* for me, y'know. And if we can only feel 4 inches at a time...that's four inches times two plus one on the up stroke and another four times two plus one on the down. Mmm...sexy math.
And once again I'm really really sorry if this is too much...but from earlier posts...this kinda seems almost tame biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:35 pm
I still doubt the reality of that. I mean, wouldn't he have to twist it up and stuff it in his underwear? And if it was a foot and two flacid, it definately would stick out and protrude into the open air out of his pants when erect, making it blatantly noticable and possibly getting him arrested for indecent exposure, unless he always wore really long T-shirts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:43 pm
Ok..I didn't get to put my 2 cents in on this subject last time...so here goes...
My hubby is maybe 1 and a half inches flacid...there is NO hanging..it's just like...a big outtie...hehe (I can say that cuz he's mine xp ). Hard..I'd say he's maybe 4 and a half - 5 and a half (he'll never let me measure dangit!) and honestly..I usually get off only after he's gone flacid again. So..it's different for everyone...and yes, I thought my hubby was HUGE at 1st because I had nothing to compare him to ^_^...I still have nothing to compare him to, so he's perfect for me!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:43 pm
Fuzzy Necromancer I still doubt the reality of that. I mean, wouldn't he have to twist it up and stuff it in his underwear? And if it was a foot and two flacid, it definately would stick out and protrude into the open air out of his pants when erect, making it blatantly noticable and possibly getting him arrested for indecent exposure, unless he always wore really long T-shirts. You have a point there, O One of Fuzziness... And if he *did* start to get hard...I bet it would hurt straining against the fabric, eh? I know it's very uncomfortable for my sweetie and he does have to...ah...*adjust* himself... and he's just a wee bit over half that... *shrugs* I wouldn't want anything that big anyway...ow sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:00 pm
Well I'm pretty sure he meant erect and not flacid, but even at that I've never heard of a p***s that large naturally. I thought I was big at roughly 8 inches, but damn, if it's realy 14" well, good luck, you may get a gal who runs screaming at the sight of it xd I've heard more women complain about thier lover being too large than complain about it being too small.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:01 pm
S.Vlad Well I'm pretty sure he meant erect and not flacid, but even at that I've never heard of a p***s that large naturally. I thought I was big at roughly 8 inches, but damn, if it's realy 14" well, good luck, you may get a gal who runs screaming at the sight of it xd I've heard more women complain about thier lover being too large than complain about it being too small. Hmm....I guess I have minimal wangage, if 8's the norm. crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:05 pm
Fear not! I think the great scientific minds who go about finding out these things say that 5-6 inches is the average.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:05 pm
Shogun Gari S.Vlad Well I'm pretty sure he meant erect and not flacid, but even at that I've never heard of a p***s that large naturally. I thought I was big at roughly 8 inches, but damn, if it's realy 14" well, good luck, you may get a gal who runs screaming at the sight of it xd I've heard more women complain about thier lover being too large than complain about it being too small. Hmm....I guess I have minimal wangage, if 8's the norm. crying They say 5 is the US average, btw love that sig, it's freakin hilarious!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
![[censord]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/23/3e/192e546ae3e23_flip.png?t=1129335955_3.00_00)
