|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:20 pm
what am i? stephen colbert now? that would be cool, but i dont think i'm as funny as either stewart or c-o-l-b-e-r-silent-t!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:39 pm
yeah, Colbert is miles ahead of you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 2:53 pm
why you always gotta put me down? <-- *with emotion but sarcastically* did you have an off day on CoD monday? i was on the ball for not playing for a couple of months!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:36 pm
off day, just a bit. I never really play headquarters, I just hopped into the game you were in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:43 pm
i love smurf and destroy the best but i hate how people just figure out the gayest possible ways of killing people right at the start of the map. noob tube from the spawn to hit the other spawn, the rain of grenades, the cheap sniper that stares at a slit of area and fires randomly and it hits and kills peoples. i'm sorry but in real war you cant just randomly throw a grenade and know that it will kill someone just because you spawn in one area over and over again. they should implement a running spawn that is sooooo far back that you cant noob tube, grenade rain and what not because people would leave at different times and it would be impossible to know when they came in. they'd haave to make it so people couldnt run up to the door and just wait for them to come in and things of course they could put invisible walls in the gawd damned air so they cant throw grenades or noob tube across the map. the problem with that is then people couldnt shoot down helis and bombing runs wouldnt work half the time. maybe make it so people cant use grenades and noob tubes for twenty seconds at the beginning of the map. like some of the old CoD:UO maps, they were so big and jumbled that you couldnt really throw random grenades at the beginning of the map because it would no be any where near the enemy. there were some old maps were you could and there was a rain corridor that you would never run down in the beginning because you WOULD die no if ands or buts, just dead. of course if the enemy was stupid enough not to throw grenades there well then yea but they were never that stupid because the russians would rush in (pun intended) and mow your a** down with their stupid PPSH's. that was the epitime of spray and pray. 71 rounds of decent fire rate and good damage.to ensure your opponent would die you would begin shooting before you got into the room and mow that pitiful soul to oblivion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:33 am
and in cod:waw, which I want every so badly, you get a flame thrower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:28 pm
oooooh like they never have done that in CoD yet. *<--said sarcastically*
in a mod for CoD:UO they had flamethrowers and they had the character skins that made you stand out with the giant pack of napalm on your back. sure you couldnt shoot it and make it explode but it was extremely hard to hide behind a small wall/rock with that s**t on. it didnt have a huge range on it so it was instant death for them but you couldnt be a b***h with it. just like they had zookas and shreks and panzerfausts and trip mines and sticky packs. i'd be amazed if they had a laser or something but then again halo already did it! dont get me wrong though, i love CoDs but if it has a terrible plot i will refuse to buy it, just like the front lines fuel of war or whatever the ******** it was called. the plot was we were running out of oil and we needed to fight for the rest of it on the planet? WTF IS THAT?!?! shouldnt we have invented some other source of fuel before that s**t happened? i'm sure we would have and i didnt want to degrade my way of thinking to play some dumb a** game. now most people might not have played it because it was politically incorrect or whatever but i use my god damned intellect. yesh god damned it. i've lost my train of thought.
oh oh! spore comes out in six days peoples!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:02 pm
Yeah, I know that. I'm just saying that call of duty world at war is going to be a shitload better than UO (and a hell of a lot better than four >.>). I think the best call of duty game so far was Call of Duty 2: Big Red One. Now that was one hell of a good game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:35 pm
was CoD2 really called the big red one? i dont remember. it sounds like there are two CoD2's one being pc and the other console. i never like first person shooters for consoles because you cant lean nor could you get the quick spinning and dead steady aiming with a controller. with a mouse i could spin three complete times if i moved it over three inches and if i was trying to shoot the ear off my enemy i could twitch my hand and the iron sight would move over ONE LITTLE PIXEL! then BAM head shot without them even knowing where it came from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:38 am
No, there was Call of Duty 2, which ran through your basic two to three people you play as through the entire game, then there was Call of Duty 2: Big Red One, which the game was a flashback, if you played the game you would know what I'm talking about, and you obviously stay through the game as that one guy, and that one company through the entire game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:05 am
boyo what the hell are you doin at 0530 in the morning?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:42 am
on the computer waiting for the bus to come at about 0655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:37 pm
Random Fact: HPV is the most prominent STD in the united states. no, it's not AIDS, AIDS and HIV are not STD's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
