|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 8:56 am
Well, what kind of fight do you want.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 8:58 am
Hm....Beats me. How about no special powers? Regular fight. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:00 am
Hmm, that is a possibility. Would it be all right if I worked with an idea of mine? I'm designing a combat mage that uses a footman's warhammer so I'd like a little praticle experiance with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:02 am
This is going to be a fun tournament. 3nodding Good luck to everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:08 am
Sure. No prob with me. 3nodding - Feels a little like a Guinea pig - o.o;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:11 am
Well then you can get it under way. I'll let you decide what terrain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:15 am
What is a footman, and what is special about his warhammer?
Isn't that like...the hooded people in Gargoyles that like...hunted them and s**t?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:16 am
Nihilistic_Impact Well then you can get it under way. I'll let you decide what terrain. Battles on the deck of a ship, are the most fun and enigmatic duels you could possibly conjure. I've yet to have one parallel in any sort of setting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
It's the kind of warhammer the men-at-arms or other small units used. I also used the term to let people know I don't mean a maul. This is the weapon I'm using.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:38 am
Crawly you can never beat me. Because you suck the big one. You choose to ignore everything.
Your fighting skill is like this.
Fighter A fires a fire ball.
Crawly "Nope it didnt happen, nope nope nope. I think you didnt do that so you didnt do it."
And you b***h about powers, all these people having radical blocking systems and what not and playing down on the D. But that just shows to everyone how pathetic you are, someone who cant become smart enough to get around the situation, someone who cant figure anything out and actually fight a fight.
You carry your gun.
You carry an ego on your sleeves as I do, but you just have a fan club of ignorant roaches that follow you around. You influence is a negative one when it comes to the progression of literate skills and combat.
So shut your ******** mouth.
And go rob a liquor store.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:43 am
This should be an interesting baptism of fire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:44 am
Clash about the situation witht he Mount and Arch you should let it go. Because in combat logic, the Arch's target didnt call the mount until the next set of actions after the matter. Which goes to show that Bint didnt read Arch's post and didnt point out that in the start. So I would call a DQ on both if you want to play it like that because than you could argue the point that they were both in on it and both knew the rules and neither responded until the second set of actions.
Either let it stay or get rid of both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:05 am
Ertai Vexic Crawly you can never beat me. Because you suck the big one. You choose to ignore everything. Your fighting skill is like this. Fighter A fires a fire ball. Crawly "Nope it didnt happen, nope nope nope. I think you didnt do that so you didnt do it." And you b***h about powers, all these people having radical blocking systems and what not and playing down on the D. But that just shows to everyone how pathetic you are, someone who cant become smart enough to get around the situation, someone who cant figure anything out and actually fight a fight. You carry your gun. You carry an ego on your sleeves as I do, but you just have a fan club of ignorant roaches that follow you around. You influence is a negative one when it comes to the progression of literate skills and combat. So shut your ******** mouth. Pot, meet kettle. Would you two like to have a tea party? Ertai Vexic Clash about the situation witht he Mount and Arch you should let it go. Because in combat logic, the Arch's target didnt call the mount until the next set of actions after the matter. Which goes to show that Bint didnt read Arch's post and didnt point out that in the start. So I would call a DQ on both if you want to play it like that because than you could argue the point that they were both in on it and both knew the rules and neither responded until the second set of actions. Either let it stay or get rid of both. I don't know what the ******** you're talking about because your prissy little fairy "combat logic" doesn't exist. There's logic and there's dumbassery, there's no in-between.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
![[Yusuke Urameshi]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/5c/be/5b31d96a2cbe5c_flip.png?t=1509782079_6.00_00&a=1&i=10198583&s=stand&f=front)
