|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:04 pm
I hate will ferrell.
You know that episode of Family Guy when stewie watches Bewitched? Yea, that's me.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:49 pm
Stranger than Fiction was FANTASTIC!
I wanna see Pursuit of Happyness too
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:57 pm
So was the producers. But it wasn't from Will Ferrill's acting though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:09 pm
Stranger however, is good due in part to his acting...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:11 pm
Right. The same way Jennifer Garner's acting make Elektra a great movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:17 pm
The difference between the two is that Stranger than Fiction was a good movie, while Elektra was absolutely terrible!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:45 pm
I'll see it on the small screen. If for no other reason I want my hopes to be failed at seeing the demise of Will Ferrill.
Though something tells me even with a hope like that, it'll still be terrible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:59 pm
Nelowulf 15 year old or not, its definately lacking any definitive complexity. Even though its not dosdoyefsky, I'm also not sure if its exactly close to being "entertaining". The movie was boring, even for me (while I rip movies to shreds, usually I find one decent aspect). Come to think of it, its like Dragonheart mixed with Lord of the Rings. The book is actually good, the director just sucked, he never directed before and was just a visual effects supervisor before the job. Thus this makes a great looking movie but the acting and story sucked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:14 pm
You may refer to me as.... Arthur Brown.
(those of you who dont' get the joke, look up "fire" by arthur brown on youtube.com)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:20 pm
The book is not good! It is cliched and he's not a very good writer. The only saving grace was that he was fifteen when he wrote it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:24 pm
PaulTheWolf5575 The book is not good! It is cliched and he's not a very good writer. The only saving grace was that he was fifteen when he wrote it. So it wasn't just the movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:28 pm
It was not just the book!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:29 pm
PaulTheWolf5575 It was not just the book! oh you mean the actors and director made it a bad movie as well? Because I would agree on that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
