|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:24 pm
A.R.G.U.S Mykal FlashbackJon Barring FW rules, I'd allow heavy stubbers as autocannons or heavy bolters. *shrug*
Why not allow them as Heavy Stubbers or Autocannons? I'm sure they're legit choices...
-Mykal Yeah, why not use them as heavy stubbers. It's not like it'd be strange for Imps to use heavy caliber machine guns... The rules are in the Eye o' Terror codex so that's easily solved and I doubt anyone would mind if you included them in your army.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:28 pm
well if you used the same rules for the dismounted heavy stubber as you did for the pintal mountd heavy stubber I beleive you will have slved this issue. With opponents permission of course
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:43 pm
Mat well if you used the same rules for the dismounted heavy stubber as you did for the pintal mountd heavy stubber I beleive you will have slved this issue. With opponents permission of course Of course with permission, and when faced with whiners, just refer to that upcoming Imperial Armour book
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:50 pm
which is chock full of opponents premission stuff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:25 am
Actually, the introductions of the Imperial Armour books state that the models can be used without your opponents consent.
Plus, the heavy stubber is already in the Imperial Guard codex. Meaning that the wheeled version is probably nothing more then a twin-linked lead belcher.
Aaaand, just because an army specializes in siege, doesn't mean that they can do other types of operations as well. Krieg is also known for it's fully armoured regiments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:06 am
Inquisitor Ophelia Warda Actually, the introductions of the Imperial Armour books state that the models can be used without your opponents consent. My latest IA book has no such suggestion. Am I simply missing it? Not to mention it would be really unsportsmanlike to field units from a non-core (ie. Forge World) book against your opponent's consent. Finally, in a tournament setting, as always, whether or not IA is allowed is the domain of the tourney organizers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 1:17 pm
FlashbackJon Azimaith He doesn't necessarily have to go forgeworld, you could go steel legion with conversions. I know people who have loads of those old models lying around. Even that's going to be pricey, as they aren't available from GW anymore, and they're highly sought after for that very reason. Which means he'll be handing over an arm and a leg over eBay or Bartertown. imperial1989 A.R.G.U.S Mykal imperial1989 im planning on starting a death corp army any advice?
I hear this might be useful.
Help @ u
-Mykal if that was a joke I think Im a little to thick to get it... That you'll need to take out a loan with your home as collateral in order to afford enough troops for a DKoK army from Forge World. Just for reference, I thought I'd calculate the cost. 400 points of DKoK, 1 HQ Command Squad and 2 Troops Infantry Platoons will cost you US$394.72 from Forge World at today's exchange rate. That's BARE MINIMUM. Also, holy s**t, you're from Papillion, NE. I'm from Omaha, though obviously I'm not there now. razz (sorry it took me so long to post a reply) dont worry about how Im going to pay for it, cost is no problem. I was asking for advice on how I should organize my army.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:40 am
If cost is no problem, then a Forge World exclusive Imperial Guard army is just about the best option you have. razz
Also, Papio?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:41 pm
ok so should I focus on infantry or tanks or should I have a mix of both?
What would fit in with the Death Corp theme?
and yes Papio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 6:31 am
DKoK have some great looking tanks, but ultimately tanks look like tanks look like tanks. It'd be tragic if you got into DKoK just to field an armored company or suchlike.
So if money is truly not an issue, droves and droves of brilliant-looking infantry would definitely be the way to go. (Especially those new rough riders! Yum!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 10:15 am
FlashbackJon DKoK have some great looking tanks, but ultimately tanks look like tanks look like tanks. It'd be tragic if you got into DKoK just to field an armored company or suchlike. So if money is truly not an issue, droves and droves of brilliant-looking infantry would definitely be the way to go. (Especially those new rough riders! Yum!)
I concur. Troop it up.
However, there is the issue of there being about 9 "shooting" poses. D:
-Mykal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 10:57 am
A.R.G.U.S Mykal
I concur. Troop it up.
However, there is the issue of there being about 9 "shooting" poses. D:
-Mykal Or, he could have a few of The Laziest Squad Ever... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 11:39 am
Look at him. Not a care in the world. Standing there willy-nilly, totally neglegant.
rolleyes
-Mykal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 5:51 pm
xd
I was actually thinking about getting that squad to house some sort of heavy weapon. Then I'd exchange the squad leader with a power weapon from another squad that only has one with a lasrifle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 2:10 am
Those are so damned lazy looking. The models are beautiful and have a lot of feeling to them, but damn, you think theyre on some watch post or at a training run. It just doesnt say "********, theres 'nids/orks/Traitors!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
