|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bogus_Burger Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:40 am
Because you're irresistible baby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:11 pm
Why do they call it "fasting" when it makes the day go slower?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:30 pm
Doesn't it slow down your metabolism too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bogus_Burger Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:55 pm
Why don't I live in Texas?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:42 pm
Why can't I speak German? It's in my blood!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:27 pm
What happens when one of two Siamese girls, who share a v****a, falls in love and wishes to marry? Would the other half be able to veto it? Would he be able to marry one half of the twins, or would he have to marry both halves?
If the guy married both halves, would he be a polygamist? Would the girls need to find Siamese male twins sharing a p***s?
If they were consummating their marriage, and only one half wanted it, would he be raping the other half? If they got a divorce, could his wife point to her sister and claim her husband was committing adultery?
If the girls had a baby (assuming they're not sterile), would they both be the mother, or only the half that was trying to get preggers? What if one half wanted an abortion, but the other wanted to keep the fetus (and the other half was pro-life)? Would both halves have to agree to IVF?
What if one of them were gay and the other was straight, and both saw the other's sexual partners as disgusting?
I could go on all day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:17 pm
Is it just me, or is gaia getting more and more boring lately?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bogus_Burger Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 5:29 pm
It is. I think it's cause people are too busy doing stuff to post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:22 am
I really should get around to posting in here again. Wait, I just did.
Actually, I didn't. I'm in the process of doing so. However, by the time you read this, it will have been done.
Which begs the question, does our present actually span our immediate past to our immediate future? After all, I'm sitting here in the present writing about now as the past as seen from the future. I'm simultaneously not only juggling multiple times in my head, but multiple perspectives of the same time from those different moments in time. And I'm doing it all naturally.
When you read this, you'll be reading what I wrote in my present in your present, having no problem with me speaking of me from your point of view (with me in the past,) me from my point of view (with me in the present), and you from my point of view (with you in the future.) Your brain will have no difficulty comprehending all of this. SHOULD IT?
Now the above paragraph is in the past, but I'm still thinking of it as if it is present.
The next sentence that I write will be lame. See? I told you so. It was only one word. How blah. Did I predict the future, the present, or the past? I think I'll call it the furesast.
What exactly is the present anyways? Is it a second? Is it a nanosecond? Between any two time units, is there not an infinite amount of smaller time units? If so, then is my present really my mind processing chunks of infinitely many time units at once? If so, then is what I experience as "present" really the immediate past mashed together with the immediate future? No wonder Vattimo said we're in "the end of history."
I should go watch some tv or something. That way, I won't think about this crap as much. But I already know I'm not going to watch tv. So why did I type that? Am I typing--and are you reading--in like 5 or 6 dimensions here?
No. Everybody knows that there are only two dimensions in the universe, and that we only imagine the third one because it makes the math easier. I mean, just look at planet orbits and the great circles, and you can see that easily.
As for time, well, that's not a dimension. It's a horrible construct of our own rationalities because we're too lazy to do anything without the ticking time clock of death looming down to us:
It was in this apartment, also, that there stood against the western wall, a gigantic clock of ebony. Its pendulum swung to and fro with a dull, heavy, monotonous clang; and when the minute-hand made the circuit of the face, and the hour was to be stricken, there came from the brazen lungs of the clock a sound which was clear and loud and deep and exceedingly musical, but of so peculiar a note and emphasis that, at each lapse of an hour, the musicians of the orchestra were constrained to pause, momentarily, in their performance, to hearken to the sound; and thus the waltzers perforce ceased their evolutions; and there was a brief disconcert of the whole gay company; and, while the chimes of the clock yet rang, it was observed that the giddiest grew pale, and the more aged and sedate passed their hands over their brows as if in confused reverie or meditation.
[. . .]
And now was acknowledged the presence of the Red Death. He had come like a thief in the night. And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall. And the life of the ebony clock went out with that of the last of the gay. And the flames of the tripods expired. And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all.
--Mr. Poe, who did, does, and will try writing poetry.
Just take some happy pills (or some really powerful pain killers), or lie down for a nap. Time melts away!
Take that, String Theory!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:34 pm
I would have said no...but it wasn't there... question confused rolleyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:57 pm
You know you've been at an amusement park too long when you get bored on a roller coaster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:50 pm
Is there anything that HASN'T been turned into porn?
Yes, I know this is rhetorical, as the answer is obviously "no."
Can't we find something else to sell?
Hehehe, yeah, I laughed at that one too.
Save sex for marriage. It's bad for the economy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:09 am
|
Bogus_Burger Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:47 pm
Dude, Whittaker totally replied to that email.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
