and_solo_said
Miyaz
and_solo_said
Miyaz
and_solo_said
Then how can it be simple?
And where are the lines between love, lust, friendship etc?
Why can't something be simple in our mind. Not as you are suggesting, with words.
Once you bring thought and direct it into words nothing is simple anymore.
There always is some aspect of your argument to rebut.
I believe that Love is simple because it is a feeling that can be vividly realised and seen (in the mind's eye) by the person whom is 'in love'.
If you do not understand such feelings/emotions/ideas then you can be classified as one whom has not experienced love before, hence this discussion would be invalid as you're understanding of 'love' is not complete.
Once you bring thought and direct it into words nothing is simple anymore.
There always is some aspect of your argument to rebut.
I believe that Love is simple because it is a feeling that can be vividly realised and seen (in the mind's eye) by the person whom is 'in love'.
If you do not understand such feelings/emotions/ideas then you can be classified as one whom has not experienced love before, hence this discussion would be invalid as you're understanding of 'love' is not complete.
Galant things have been done for love.
Atrocities have been commited for it.
For any emotion to drive anyone to such extremes it cannot be simple.
Why?
Love is simple because it overrides the commitments of oneself.
You love.
And thus you do all you can to keep that love.
Is that so hard to understand?
Love is simple; it binds people together, it is, you can put it 'addictive'.
You love because you want to love, thus you do everything in your power to love.
It's a simple concept.
I don't join many guilds so no, i'm not a member of the Romantics Society.
Love is simple because it overrides the commitments of oneself.
You love.
And thus you do all you can to keep that love.
Is that so hard to understand?
Love is simple; it binds people together, it is, you can put it 'addictive'.
You love because you want to love, thus you do everything in your power to love.
It's a simple concept.
I don't join many guilds so no, i'm not a member of the Romantics Society.
But love is not simply the feeling of love, it is, as is everything else, relative to situation. The fact that any man would be driven to galantry or evil would illustrate that love, in a social context, is not a simple matter. Nor is the feeling easy to understand for everyone, as love is a many pronged star. Love between friends and comrades, the love between a man and a woman (excuse the homo-exclusive expression, but it is what I am used to saying), the love between children and their parents. There is irreperable damage to these loves if borders are crosses (e.g. incest *shudder*)
There is the saying:
"Love knows no boundaries."
You can say, to some extent, that my concept of love may exist between all your 'prongs' of the 'love star.'
I'm sure a mother would save their child and keep their connection of love rather than lose it.
Love between mother and daughter and love between husband and wife in it's origin is the same, but the way in which that love is expressed is different.
Must it be expressed in a social context?
I am willing to argue love in an emotive context.
Love, the feeling in itself is not complex at all. What love makes you do can be quite perplexing.
The reason is simple though: To continue your love.
"Love knows no boundaries."
You can say, to some extent, that my concept of love may exist between all your 'prongs' of the 'love star.'
I'm sure a mother would save their child and keep their connection of love rather than lose it.
Love between mother and daughter and love between husband and wife in it's origin is the same, but the way in which that love is expressed is different.
Must it be expressed in a social context?
I am willing to argue love in an emotive context.
Love, the feeling in itself is not complex at all. What love makes you do can be quite perplexing.
The reason is simple though: To continue your love.
