|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:19 pm
Why is everyone taking for granted that we'll even have another day, or that the cop will even get to use his role? Am I the only person who thinks this is a pretty fragile basket to be putting all our eggs in...?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:25 pm
I recommend you don't bother wasting an investigation on me. Of course I have no means to convince you of that, but it wouldn't help us get anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:29 pm
Cabron LaSwan
Why is everyone taking for granted that we'll even have another day, or that the cop will even get to use his role? Am I the only person who thinks this is a pretty fragile basket to be putting all our eggs in...?we are basically dealing with in-active snipers. there is no longer a vigilante or a serial killer. basically its a day by day classic mafia. We have a slight advantage over the usual in that we have dulnair, but i doubt he will live much longer to be honest, so it is advisable we work together to get things done. So yes, our situation is fragile, but we can make use of it, so we might as well. that doesnt mean we stop investigating. keep up the evil eye and dont ge too confident
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:47 pm
Rhed King Cabron LaSwan Why is everyone taking for granted that we'll even have another day, or that the cop will even get to use his role? Am I the only person who thinks this is a pretty fragile basket to be putting all our eggs in...? we are basically dealing with in-active snipers. there is no longer a vigilante or a serial killer. basically its a day by day classic mafia. We have a slight advantage over the usual in that we have dulnair, but i doubt he will live much longer to be honest, so it is advisable we work together to get things done. So yes, our situation is fragile, but we can make use of it, so we might as well. that doesnt mean we stop investigating. keep up the evil eye and dont ge too confident That's just the thing. I don't see an advantage at all. I see a useless cop and preoccupied protective roles. I see a vulnerable position, not an advantage. And I see Owwin, and now you, trying to lull us into a false sense of security. And I see... nobody really giving a s**t about this.
In fact, I see no one in general, wtf? Where the hell is everyone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:05 pm
I think you misunderstand me. we are in a really terrible bind fueled by poor attendance, but we might as well make the most of our cop while he lasts.
aside from this, j hasn't been around in a while, and he has generally been scarce. he is the person i am most suspicious of currently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:19 pm
"Terrible bind fueled by poor attendance."
YOU HEAR THAT INACTIVES? YEAH, WHICHEVER TEAM YOU'RE ON, YOUR TEAMMATES ARE NOT IMPRESSED.
Ahh whatever. It might be pointless to act alone, but I'm not going to let the game be played for me just because I'm not the cop. Vote Owwin. I probably should have acted on this suspicion a lot sooner, but with the way activity's been, I'm not sure that would have made a difference anyway, and I really doubt it will now. Everything's worth a try, though. I don't have a solid case and I don't expect to reach a majority, but I refuse to just let things happen: I'm a player, not a spectator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:24 pm
I'm on.
I'll read through and see what I missed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:03 pm
Cabron LaSwan Here's the remaining player list.
1. LPenisS
2. Owwin Sparkle
3. Dull-newbie (confirmed cop)
4. ZK
5. Rhed King of the Lio-wait
6. J of the Girly Emotes
7. Aniuhungrylikethewolfe
With seven people left, the spread is either 5:2 town:mafia or 4:3 town:mafia. If it's the latter, which I think is more likely, one mistake will cost us the game. In light of that possibility, I'd like to examine people who have undergone noticeable changes in playstyle today. For example, Owwin seems a lot less.. contribute-y, Rhed's posting patterns have done a complete 180 since the beginning of the game, and where the hell is Aniu?
That said, I just woke up and got online myself and haven't been monitoring activity patterns in the rest of the guild, so I can't really say which of these three strike me as the most suspicious right now. I don't think I've ever seen a game where there initially were two Mafia members, even in smaller games here. I'd guess there are three people. Owwin I contribute! Also I would be fine with being investigated, but it would be a huge waste. It is fine that you are suspicious of me, you have been the whole game and it is totally justified, but shouldn't we investigate Kitty or J? Both of them typically stay quiet and then are a big part of the endgame. I mean, they have given us almost nothing to go on. An investigation would get us a lot of info from nothing. Like LPS mentioned, I haven't been very active because of work. Ending Day 3 really early pushed back the End of Day time, so I should be able to contribute more. Rhed King I recommend you don't bother wasting an investigation on me. Of course I have no means to convince you of that, but it wouldn't help us get anywhere. All investigations, whether of Townies or Mafians, help out. Investigating a Townie won't directly lead us to scum, but it means we have another confirmed innocent. That's one more person that we can trust, and one less person on our list of possible scum. Not wanting to be investigated strikes me as suspicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:17 pm
I've been suspicious of Rhed King ever since he started the vote on me, and put in the majority vote on Orphie (despite other players wanting to give him a chance to defend himself, because he wanted to "keep things moving.").
Right now, the chances of hitting a townie or mafia are fifty-fifty, right? I want to go with my initial suspicions and vote Rhed King.
I'm hesitant to let someone else tell me who to investigate, since they may be mafia directing the investigation away from their team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 6:49 pm
THANK YOU. I was sitting here double facepalming because nobody seemed to realize (or care about) the potential gravity of the situation and the fact that you will likely get roleblocked anyway. I will change my vote to Rhed, then. I don't suspect him as strongly as I do Owwin, but he's making the same argument and if it's 4:3 like I think it is, we will have to be in unanimous agreement.
...We will all also have to show the ******** up, or hope that the inactives are on the Mafia side.
God, that pisses me off. Activity really shouldn't be something we should have to account for, like, at all. This is foolshit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:10 pm
Now that I've tried them both, I think I prefer a set schedule; everyone can state their availability and commit. Fluid schedules, while they can move things along, make it possible for the deadline to be when most people are getting ragemolested by life.
So, unanimous agreement on one person if we're to win. We have, like, an hour and... twenty minutes? As of this post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:26 pm
Same as with Orphie, I'm going to hold off voting for now. I'll give Rhed a chance to defend himself first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:34 pm
Well I think its safe to say i have no means of defending myself. You seem to suspect me; so you might as well follow it through.
I am going to state, that in complete honesty, I am a vanilla townie.
no reverse psychology s**t, no lies of omission. I can do one thing, and that is to vote each night.
If you're willing to believe me, then i feel you will agree it is rather silly to investigate or lynch me.
As for my vote, i trust owwin and lps by this point, which might be a bad move, but i have to trust somebody at least. Normally i would jump on the band wagon to force the person off. but today that happens to be me.
J hasnt been around, and I am still weary of him, so I guess I will:
VOTE J (of the wind)
and dulnair, yes i closed the gates on orphie to keep things moving, and our suspicions turned out to be correct, yes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:57 pm
oh ok well this is a game of deception so you couldn't possibly be lying or anything then, unvote rhed
Come on now. Would that defense assuage your suspicions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:58 pm
Orphie was indeed Azula, but voting off someone before they've had a chance to attempt a defense adds an increased, but avoidable, risk to an already risky game. For instance, everybody voted because of the possibility that I was the cop. But another possibility was that I was lying, and Orphie was in fact innocent (or even more direly, the cop.)
There are a lot of what-ifs when nobody is a confirmed townie, but getting people's last words can reduce those what-ifs later on. I think the reason I most want to get somebody's last words is in case they really are a cop; it gives them a chance to name names before they're lost forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
