|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:10 pm
Wantcookie Owwin Guys! I have a plan! Vote by role! That way you will kill them without knowing their identity! Foolproof! GENIUS Wait? Are you following my lead? BANDWAGONER! Vote Cookie
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:10 pm
On another noteAllegro  At first I lol'd  But then I srs'd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:10 pm
Wantcookie Read through thread.  FoS Wylr.Wylr's been pushing hard for Med to be lynched, and I'm pretty damn certain that he was just playing along with what I was doing/saying, with no ulterior motives. Keep in mind that I started the conversations and was really leading. Besides, it's the first time we've really been in a mafia together, what did you think was going to happen? WylrPnufh I just wanted SOMETHING to happen on day 1. This strikes me as odd. Yes, they might kill off two people. But if we act now without any substantial information, we'd most likely be adding to our losses. This would be fine if it wasn't compounded by his actions before, even prematurely voting Med to be lynched. It almost sounds like he wants to kill off someone just to be rid of one more player, whether it be townie or opposite mafia. 
The only question that leaves me with is why Med? Why stick to an offense that's being challenged if your only goal is to cause a death? There has to be a reason for his insistence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:16 pm
Hobo Scruffy On another noteAllegro At first I lol'd But then I srs'd game over hobo wins (not really)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:17 pm
Hobo Scruffy Those are normal homoerotic posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:19 pm
Everything you've all been saying has been running in my thoughts. I don't know where it leaves me, but I'm looking back and finding I don't have a case against Med. But I'm not going to vote night because I don't like the idea of wasting a lynch. Not that really really wasting if we have no suspects, but I digress...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:26 pm
Hashire Kazemeijin Hobo Scruffy Those are normal homoerotic posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:32 pm
I'm here, I'm here!! I feel like I'm tardy for a school or something. burning_eyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharkbutt The Orgiastic Crew
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:35 pm
Cabron the Swan Wantcookie Read through thread. FoS Wylr.Wylr's been pushing hard for Med to be lynched, and I'm pretty damn certain that he was just playing along with what I was doing/saying, with no ulterior motives. Keep in mind that I started the conversations and was really leading. Besides, it's the first time we've really been in a mafia together, what did you think was going to happen? WylrPnufh I just wanted SOMETHING to happen on day 1. This strikes me as odd. Yes, they might kill off two people. But if we act now without any substantial information, we'd most likely be adding to our losses. This would be fine if it wasn't compounded by his actions before, even prematurely voting Med to be lynched. It almost sounds like he wants to kill off someone just to be rid of one more player, whether it be townie or opposite mafia.
The only question that leaves me with is why Med? Why stick to an offense that's being challenged if your only goal is to cause a death? There has to be a reason for his insistence.Simple: He's an easy target. He's one of the first few who did anything that can be vaguely construed as suspicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:41 pm
I'm not insistent on Medeus. Like I said, something needs to happen, or we'll all just be picked off one-by-one.
I just went with Medeus, cause of my initial suspicion. I feel like it'd be MORE suspicious if I flop around with my votes
I could change it
To YOU, Cookie, if you insist I'm being suspicious. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharkbutt The Orgiastic Crew
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:41 pm
Montiqueue I'm here, I'm here!! I feel like I'm tardy for a school or something. burning_eyes What took you? xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:41 pm
Arguments and lols aside, we must ask ourselves; WHY ISN'T HE DEFENDING HIMSELF?
Med, get in here and say something!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:47 pm
Hobo Scruffy Arguments and lols aside, we must ask ourselves; WHY ISN'T HE DEFENDING HIMSELF?
Med, get in here and say something!! He hasn't signed in since 3 something. Besides that he just may be busy, but hopefully he will sign in and check the events before the day is over
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:48 pm
Wantcookie Montiqueue I'm here, I'm here!! I feel like I'm tardy for a school or something. burning_eyes What took you? xd err... got grounded for a day. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharkbutt The Orgiastic Crew
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:51 pm
WylrPnufh I'm not insistent on Medeus. Like I said, something needs to happen, or we'll all just be picked off one-by-one.
I just went with Medeus, cause of my initial suspicion. I feel like it'd be MORE suspicious if I flop around with my votes
I could change it
To YOU, Cookie, if you insist I'm being suspicious. wink  My point exactly, Herr Suspicious. If you're so eager to lynch that you're willing to change your target that quickly, then something's up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
