|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:45 am
Dysfunctional Design kuntrykid Triley kuntrykid Dysfunctional Design Well... There are a whole lot of heterosexuals that marry for the benefits, and not for love. There are heterosexuals who marry for a whole hell of a lot of reasons aside from love. If they're allowed to corrupt it the way they do then why can't at least the gays who don't intend to corrupt it get married? It's not right to marry for anything but love. That's why I'm against gay marriage... I don't believe that it's actually love.
So, where's the crusade against heterosexuals who aren't in love, and are married?
See, I'm finally here with my boyfriend, and I'm pretty damn sure that what I am in right now is love. confused Unless someone changed the meaning of it.
And by the way, your signature is over the size limit, and you should take care of that.~ I Love Kyle. ~ I hate the heterosexuals who marry for anything but love as much as anyone (say, I should make a topic for that soon!) but that's not what this is about... Also, no-one changed the meaning of love but I can't really prove or disprove that it's not love... And, thanks, I'll check on my sig. Can you prove or disprove that what any heterosexuals have is love any more or less than you can for homosexuals? No.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:59 am
Zombie Keiya kuntrykid Why does everyone keep posing the same questions? My answers aren't about to change and unless someone has a fresh viewpoint, we need to get a few more questions. Let's look at this theoretically... if homosexuality were to be absolutely, without-a-doubt, proven natural, then it would only make sense to provide all with the extra right of gay marriage... now suppose it was a choice (unconscious though it may be)... if it was a wrong choice, it would be wrong to provide the extra rights. Since neither can be proven, it's left up to theological reason. I want to know why gay marriage is an extra right, while heterosexual marriage is just a right. In my opinion, legal marriage is a priviledge, no matter who is getting married. However, I do believe that gay couples should be given the same rights as straight couples. If your argument is that it's harmful to society because it doesn't produce offspring, I'd like to introduce you to the concept of overpopulation. It's a serious issue these days. If your argument is that it will destroy the "sanctity" of marriage, maybe you should consider arguing against arranged marriages, shotgun weddings, drunken Vegas weddings, and my personal favorite: celebrities looking for more publicity. I don't even want to get into the issue of love. Most of the gay couples are more in love than 9/10 of the straight couples I know, including ones who have been married for more than 25 years. Now, for the issue of whether being gay occurs naturally or is a choice. I know a lot of gay people. If I were to ask any one of them whether they chose to be gay, they'd laugh at me. Most of the gay people I know spent years hating themselves for it, thinking they were unnatural freaks, knowing that most of society (including their loved ones) would never accept it. I don't know a single gay person who just woke up one day and thought, "I'm going to be gay." Even if it were a choice, how can anyone say that it's the wrong choice? Love is entirely too rare and precious to deny someone because of narrow-minded societal constraints. I just feel that love should be recognized and celebrated. Ok, where do I start? We have the right to marry the opposite sex and the right to marry the same sex is extra. I don't care about overpopulation. I don't care about the sanctity of marriage. A marriage that is right, whatever it may be, will be just as good with the celebrity 1 hour marriages happening. Now... I've been over my point on this before. It's possible that being homosexual is an unconscious choice influenced to occur by past events. Yes, "Love is entirely too rare and precious to deny someone because of narrow-minded societal constraints." But that's what I've been saying for months... what if it's not actually love?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:49 pm
kuntrykid Dysfunctional Design kuntrykid Triley kuntrykid Dysfunctional Design Well... There are a whole lot of heterosexuals that marry for the benefits, and not for love. There are heterosexuals who marry for a whole hell of a lot of reasons aside from love. If they're allowed to corrupt it the way they do then why can't at least the gays who don't intend to corrupt it get married? It's not right to marry for anything but love. That's why I'm against gay marriage... I don't believe that it's actually love.
So, where's the crusade against heterosexuals who aren't in love, and are married?
See, I'm finally here with my boyfriend, and I'm pretty damn sure that what I am in right now is love. confused Unless someone changed the meaning of it.
And by the way, your signature is over the size limit, and you should take care of that.~ I Love Kyle. ~ I hate the heterosexuals who marry for anything but love as much as anyone (say, I should make a topic for that soon!) but that's not what this is about... Also, no-one changed the meaning of love but I can't really prove or disprove that it's not love... And, thanks, I'll check on my sig. Can you prove or disprove that what any heterosexuals have is love any more or less than you can for homosexuals? No. If it can't be proved for either, why should one have what the other does not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:12 pm
Dysfunctional Design kuntrykid Dysfunctional Design kuntrykid Triley
So, where's the crusade against heterosexuals who aren't in love, and are married?
See, I'm finally here with my boyfriend, and I'm pretty damn sure that what I am in right now is love. confused Unless someone changed the meaning of it.
And by the way, your signature is over the size limit, and you should take care of that.~ I Love Kyle. ~ I hate the heterosexuals who marry for anything but love as much as anyone (say, I should make a topic for that soon!) but that's not what this is about... Also, no-one changed the meaning of love but I can't really prove or disprove that it's not love... And, thanks, I'll check on my sig. Can you prove or disprove that what any heterosexuals have is love any more or less than you can for homosexuals? No. If it can't be proved for either, why should one have what the other does not? Evolution can not be proven nor disproved yet we teach it in schools. God can not be proven nor disproved yet we are not allowed to pray in schools. And as for the "it's not hurting anyone" argument, christianity doesn't hurt anyone yet we have the so called "constitutional" separation of church and state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:14 pm
kuntrykid Dysfunctional Design kuntrykid Dysfunctional Design kuntrykid Triley
So, where's the crusade against heterosexuals who aren't in love, and are married?
See, I'm finally here with my boyfriend, and I'm pretty damn sure that what I am in right now is love. confused Unless someone changed the meaning of it.
And by the way, your signature is over the size limit, and you should take care of that.~ I Love Kyle. ~ I hate the heterosexuals who marry for anything but love as much as anyone (say, I should make a topic for that soon!) but that's not what this is about... Also, no-one changed the meaning of love but I can't really prove or disprove that it's not love... And, thanks, I'll check on my sig. Can you prove or disprove that what any heterosexuals have is love any more or less than you can for homosexuals? No. If it can't be proved for either, why should one have what the other does not? Evolution can not be proven nor disproved yet we teach it in schools. God can not be proven nor disproved yet we are not allowed to pray in schools. And as for the "it's not hurting anyone" argument, christianity doesn't hurt anyone yet we have the so called "constitutional" separation of church and state. That's science. Theories. Tried and tested and probably right but maybe wrong. If it changes, we change, and start teaching that instead. It improves upon itself. The theory of evolution has a whole lot backing it up, and we don't have a better explanation with more behind it at the moment. So, we teach evolution. You can pray in school. I don't know what school you're in, but unless it's full of psychos I don't think they'd punish you for stickin' your hands together and praisin' the lord at your desk. Unless I'm mistaken, it's not better or worse where you do it, just that you do it. You don't need everyone else silent and praising with you. And besides that, it could be considered offensive for the other ten million religions out there. Do we have to make time for every single last one of them? No. That would take out half the school day. Which I'm sure the kids would cheer about, if it weren't even MORE boring to sit around and watch other people perform their religious rituals for three hours. The constitutional separation of Church and State is, as I see it, to draw a line between faith (which are unproven and very very many) and fact (which are proven and relatively few). Can't you be satisfied with the "In God We Trust" on all the money?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:48 am
Gender shouldn't effect love. They should be able to get married.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:39 pm
If the whole world does anything, then it becomes a problem. There is room for gays and lesbians and bisexuals in the world. Also, see:religeon. twisted We can't decide on which imaginary friend is the right one, and we can't even agree to disagree long enough to realize that killing each other over it makes no sense. The best part of life is the variety
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:26 pm
Gender differance or equlity. We are human, we stand with our friends family and even fo. But yet it does notmatter what sex you are, if you love them you love them. That is that. heart heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:09 am
Dysfunctional Design kuntrykid Dysfunctional Design kuntrykid Dysfunctional Design Can you prove or disprove that what any heterosexuals have is love any more or less than you can for homosexuals? No. If it can't be proved for either, why should one have what the other does not? Evolution can not be proven nor disproved yet we teach it in schools. God can not be proven nor disproved yet we are not allowed to pray in schools. And as for the "it's not hurting anyone" argument, christianity doesn't hurt anyone yet we have the so called "constitutional" separation of church and state. That's science. Theories. Tried and tested and probably right but maybe wrong. If it changes, we change, and start teaching that instead. It improves upon itself. The theory of evolution has a whole lot backing it up, and we don't have a better explanation with more behind it at the moment. So, we teach evolution. You can pray in school. I don't know what school you're in, but unless it's full of psychos I don't think they'd punish you for stickin' your hands together and praisin' the lord at your desk. Unless I'm mistaken, it's not better or worse where you do it, just that you do it. You don't need everyone else silent and praising with you. And besides that, it could be considered offensive for the other ten million religions out there. Do we have to make time for every single last one of them? No. That would take out half the school day. Which I'm sure the kids would cheer about, if it weren't even MORE boring to sit around and watch other people perform their religious rituals for three hours. The constitutional separation of Church and State is, as I see it, to draw a line between faith (which are unproven and very very many) and fact (which are proven and relatively few). Can't you be satisfied with the "In God We Trust" on all the money? ~[ ((We also say "one nation under god," in the Pledgle of alegence and our national song has god in it as well. Also a large percentage of our goverment tend to run the country due to their relgious beliefs. Gorge W. Bush prevented gay marriage because it ruined the sacninty of marriage, personal belief? I would say so. Religion is prevelent all over our goverment.))]~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:18 am
kuntrykid If the whole world went homosexual humans would die out. I know that's not in danger of happening but, if it wasn't meant for the whole world then why would it be meant for a portion of it? Why not? I think "meant" is the wrong word here. Homosexuality isn't "meant" for anybody, it's just that some people are (but most people aren't). It's like saying "why is left-handedness meant for only a portion?" It is what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:11 pm
People who discriminate againt homosexuals are just scared of them or they are jealous because secretly they want to be one too. Just let them get married, everyone should experience the happiness/misery that comes along with marriage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 6:36 am
kuntrykid 2. stressed I'm debating that homosexuals don't actually love each other. Okay so here is where i step in! Who the hell gave you the right to say they don't love each other i wasn't given the freakin ability to love anyone even though i try i cant feel that emotion i also don't feel regret or compassion BUT even i still acknowledge that Gay/lesbian/bisexual/heterosexual can love whoever they love! Do you know how it would feel not to feel any of these and then at the age of 14 find out there is such a thing, AND guess what it shouldn't matter who you love you are just ******** lucky to have loved i would say i feel bad for you but that would be a lie! evil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 9:52 am
I support gay marriage a 110%, I believe if you love someone you should be able to express that in anyway you want. It really gets to me when people say its a sin and God is against it, because you have to truely think about it, God created humans, right, well in that case he created everything we are which means he created some people gay and some straight for a reason! Andwhen people down gay people and say they shouldn't get married you should really think about how you would feel if heterosexuality was the minority and the homosexuals tell you you can't get married, it would suck and you wouldn't put up with it. People you need to get past the whole prejudice thing, it gets you nowhere in life. The truth is you fear the idea of someone being gay because you don't understand it, and if you took the time to get to know them you would realize the only thing different between you and them is who they love. And on a side note, if you think about a guy is being gay everytime he masturbates, I mean really he is touching a male part! Its also wrong when a guy says he is against gays and then goes home and pops on some good old girl on girl action porn!!!!!! STOP BEING SO DAMN HYPOCRITICAL!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:29 pm
Finding love is not easy. If you can find it then your lucky. heart
Marriage is not easy. If you can make it work your lucky. heart
It doesn't matter if your straight or gay.
If you can get it then I say god bless you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
