|
|
|
|
|
Midus Sonners Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 7:42 am
Since Noire left, I may have someone take his spot. Or just have the two people without an opponent duel it out, and extend the date by two days.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 8:08 am
Just have the two people without an opponent duke it out in some other thread. It doesn't make sense from a tournament (IC) standpoint to just change the matchups while other people are already fighting.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 9:47 am
Arberus The Darth Vizzle Men argue and fight more because we're the more aggressive of the sexes, outwardly. Women can be mean and aggressive, but they're not nearly as open as men. We clearly don't know the same women. It's just a general statement. I know plenty of women who don't have a problem with just punching someone in the mouth if they get pissed. But overall, I think men are openly aggressive more than women, which explains things like wrestling, boxing, etc and why these are largely billed as masculine sports, even if women do them in smaller leagues. And if someone doesn't have an opponent right now, or the opponent didn't show, or the person has been left hanging, give them a bye. A person should be rewarded for the fact that they've stuck around. It's not their fault their opponent didn't show. Plus, easier to deal with.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 9:55 am
I'm not sure If I should just stand my fight up and go with that. Or just keep on trying to grapple.
Because currently the latter is becoming slightly annoying.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midus Sonners Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 9:58 am
This tournament is about roleplay. There's stories to be developed, entertainment to be brought, and yes, there is the technical stuff that no good roleplay can go without. So, just try to balance it from your point of view, and you'll have a much better look in the judges' eyes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 10:14 am
I didn't think I would be using Sanji's trademark technique so soon.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:07 am
[Sniff.] This could either turn out awesome or leave me and Mooo really screwed over in the next 10 seconds in-fight, not sure which.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 6:41 pm
I don't want to call in a judge, I don't think it is neccesary. I just have a question about something.
Is it right if your opponent goes back in time because of an incorrect assumption concerning a technique? Or is it the opponent ask if he doesn't understand something about a technique before he post?
This is concerning my opponents latest post where he went back in time because he did not understand that a double leg takedown was different from a tackle, since Tres's knee's would beneath him after the technique was performed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 6:46 pm
To be honest Tres, I don't know...never had the problem. Always asked OOC about the technique so I could get it right...If you ask me, thats the correct way to go about...whether asking in pms or on the thread, doesn't matter.
Tonights Ramblings from Terren: So, why are older brothers assholes to their younger sisters? Or just in general, why are older siblings assholes to the younger siblings?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 6:50 pm
Because younger siblings ask to many damn questions. Up to a point, its ok. But after a while, you just don't want to be bothered by stupid questions. Or some other annoying feature that all younger siblings have.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 6:54 pm
Tres Ecstuffuan I don't want to call in a judge, I don't think it is neccesary. I just have a question about something. Is it right if your opponent goes back in time because of an incorrect assumption concerning a technique? Or is it the opponent ask if he doesn't understand something about a technique before he post? This is concerning my opponents latest post where he went back in time because he did not understand that a double leg takedown was different from a tackle, since Tres's knee's would beneath him after the technique was performed. Deity let that part slide, remember? > >;
What he changed were his actions in response to his hold around Tres' neck being broken (...the hold, not his neck). You yourself said it would be easy to break and never at any point in that post mentioned holding the arm during or afterward.
Only after Deity decided to use said arm did you go back on what was established and say that Tres was holding it. Because the side control was interrupted, yes? So you changed your action to suit the new situation.
The original action Deity took (sliding out from under Tres) would not have been decided upon if his arm was caught by his opponent, so he thus changed what his character did according to the new info that you presented, that being that Deity's left arm was now restrained.
You did the same thing, so he doesn't see what the problem is.
@Terren: Deity just thinks it's a sibling thing... Dx; ...he's called an a*****e by his older sister all the time.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 7:01 pm
Lol Diety...But seriously Luv, what if that younger sibling hardly ever sees the older sibling and when the older sibling and the younger sibling DO see each other and the younger sibling is the more mature one, WHY is the older sibling STILL an a*****e?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 7:09 pm
I did say it would be easy to break, but at no time did I mention releasing the arm until after he reached side control.
It was never established that he would let go before he would reach side control. Since the side control was interrupted, he never let go. I never changed anything.
I am obviously trying to go as in detail as possible, but I operate under the belief that If I grab something then It is held until otherwise noted. It was only noted that his right hand was doing something different, until after he reached side control and went for the keylock.
I didn't do the same thing. So there is a problem.
but that is all irrelevent, I wasn't reffering to any of this. I was reffering to the thing with the bad half guard you tried to pull, and now it isn't happening because I had to tell you a double leg is not a tackle.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 7:13 pm
Terren Misuyaki Lol Diety...But seriously Luv, what if that younger sibling hardly ever sees the older sibling and when the older sibling and the younger sibling DO see each other and the younger sibling is the more mature one, WHY is the older sibling STILL an a*****e? I think you just answered your own question.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|