|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:13 pm
Then you would be nullifying your own argument as well.
In which case you have no "proven" right to call me belligent, spiteful, or narcissitic. You assume I am, when in my actuality, you are.
A fact like gravity is based on a Scientific Law. A scientific law is unlikely to ever be proven wrong. We call it a fact because it has never been sufficiently proven wrong.
We would be utterly useless if we second guessed everything like you are proposing. That is why we have facts.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:25 pm
My argument is based on pure philosophical theory, which is more valid than your purely bias opinion. My right is simply based on the text in which is a completely different world.
What you see, and hear, and feel aren't definitively there. Facts are simply something to make sure you have something to base your daily life on. A method of extending life on something that the majority believes to be true. You are basing your arguments on the idea that you 'know' that you're right, when you can't totally prove it because nothing has virginal, absolute truth. Please understand, the world itself is not a promise, just an understanding, that no being could ever completely fathom. All points, unless brought down to an earthly, and petty level, are pointless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:32 pm
And once again, your last statement negates everything you just said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:34 pm
Atrasententia And once again, your last statement negates everything you just said. And your counter point. Why reply? ♥
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:36 pm
Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 yes but still i now im not "Adonis" but hell i don't do it out of narcissism either i do it for an unbiased sample on my looks i am just curious as to how people think i look And what's your meditated reasoning? Because you want to be told you look good, so you CAN be narcissistic. It's all a circular excuse. no i don't care if i look good or not but i don't know where i am on that scale since everyone at school either is my friend or my enemy there is no in between so that means that i cannot get an unbiased opinion and also i have been meaning to change my look so opinions on that aren't bad either So in your mind there is a scale of beauty...I see... yes there is a scale of beauty otherwise everyone on eart would look the same now this scale varies form person to person and there perception of said person now the only way to understand your place on this scale is to get an unbiased sample group now...the reason i want this information is because this helps me understand which girls are in and out of my league so i can focus more on a smaller group of girls thats all... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Your view is that there is a set reality, where there isn't. There are thousands of different views on beauty. Even in the past 100 years beauty by female standards has changed a lot. Once upon a time it was based on the thin-ness of her arms/shoulders, then later on the length of a woman's legs, then the size of her bust, the cut of her face, etc. Due to this, the 'absolute' image has skewed very much over the years, and over distances as well. You'd be better off defining male beauty for yourself, and go by what YOU see as appealing, then you'll be more likely to find someone with whom you can communicate, as opposed to being told you're beautiful or ugly by people you'd never ever interact with on that level of intimacy. yes wich is why they are an unbiased group and it dosent matter there veiws with a large enough sample size that data becomes irrelevant and it becomes an overall scale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:43 pm
dot_hack_ver2 Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 no i don't care if i look good or not but i don't know where i am on that scale since everyone at school either is my friend or my enemy there is no in between so that means that i cannot get an unbiased opinion and also i have been meaning to change my look so opinions on that aren't bad either So in your mind there is a scale of beauty...I see... yes there is a scale of beauty otherwise everyone on eart would look the same now this scale varies form person to person and there perception of said person now the only way to understand your place on this scale is to get an unbiased sample group now...the reason i want this information is because this helps me understand which girls are in and out of my league so i can focus more on a smaller group of girls thats all... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Your view is that there is a set reality, where there isn't. There are thousands of different views on beauty. Even in the past 100 years beauty by female standards has changed a lot. Once upon a time it was based on the thin-ness of her arms/shoulders, then later on the length of a woman's legs, then the size of her bust, the cut of her face, etc. Due to this, the 'absolute' image has skewed very much over the years, and over distances as well. You'd be better off defining male beauty for yourself, and go by what YOU see as appealing, then you'll be more likely to find someone with whom you can communicate, as opposed to being told you're beautiful or ugly by people you'd never ever interact with on that level of intimacy. yes wich is why they are an unbiased group and it dosent matter there veiws with a large enough sample size that data becomes irrelevant and it becomes an overall scale Close your browser, grab a comb, and a handful of clothes. Lay out your wardrobe, decide what YOU like out of it, and simply be confident in what you look like the next day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:12 pm
Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 no i don't care if i look good or not but i don't know where i am on that scale since everyone at school either is my friend or my enemy there is no in between so that means that i cannot get an unbiased opinion and also i have been meaning to change my look so opinions on that aren't bad either So in your mind there is a scale of beauty...I see... yes there is a scale of beauty otherwise everyone on eart would look the same now this scale varies form person to person and there perception of said person now the only way to understand your place on this scale is to get an unbiased sample group now...the reason i want this information is because this helps me understand which girls are in and out of my league so i can focus more on a smaller group of girls thats all... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Your view is that there is a set reality, where there isn't. There are thousands of different views on beauty. Even in the past 100 years beauty by female standards has changed a lot. Once upon a time it was based on the thin-ness of her arms/shoulders, then later on the length of a woman's legs, then the size of her bust, the cut of her face, etc. Due to this, the 'absolute' image has skewed very much over the years, and over distances as well. You'd be better off defining male beauty for yourself, and go by what YOU see as appealing, then you'll be more likely to find someone with whom you can communicate, as opposed to being told you're beautiful or ugly by people you'd never ever interact with on that level of intimacy. yes wich is why they are an unbiased group and it dosent matter there veiws with a large enough sample size that data becomes irrelevant and it becomes an overall scale Close your browser, grab a comb, and a handful of clothes. Lay out your wardrobe, decide what YOU like out of it, and simply be confident in what you look like the next day. y'know you are kinda hypocritical to me you say you're not narcissistic but you are telling everyone else that they ARE in some shape or form wich technically means you're better than everyone else and then makes you the narcissist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:05 pm
Kingrussel Atrasententia And once again, your last statement negates everything you just said. And your counter point. Why reply? ♥ Why? Because I can~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:13 pm
due to my innate ability to get horribly ill at the worst possible times, I will not be getting into my drow costume but fear not, I'll get all dressed up and get a pic when i'm in better health so you guys can see how badass I was SUPPOSED to look tonight XP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:23 pm
Reivan The Drow due to my innate ability to get horribly ill at the worst possible times, I will not be getting into my drow costume but fear not, I'll get all dressed up and get a pic when i'm in better health so you guys can see how badass I was SUPPOSED to look tonight XP -petpet (spreading more H1N1 pixie dust)-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:45 pm
Perhaps we can get this thread back on topic now...kthxbi!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:25 am
Atrasententia  Happy now? thats my screen saver XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:27 am
dot_hack_ver2 Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 Kingrussel dot_hack_ver2 yes there is a scale of beauty otherwise everyone on eart would look the same now this scale varies form person to person and there perception of said person now the only way to understand your place on this scale is to get an unbiased sample group now...the reason i want this information is because this helps me understand which girls are in and out of my league so i can focus more on a smaller group of girls thats all... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Your view is that there is a set reality, where there isn't. There are thousands of different views on beauty. Even in the past 100 years beauty by female standards has changed a lot. Once upon a time it was based on the thin-ness of her arms/shoulders, then later on the length of a woman's legs, then the size of her bust, the cut of her face, etc. Due to this, the 'absolute' image has skewed very much over the years, and over distances as well. You'd be better off defining male beauty for yourself, and go by what YOU see as appealing, then you'll be more likely to find someone with whom you can communicate, as opposed to being told you're beautiful or ugly by people you'd never ever interact with on that level of intimacy. yes wich is why they are an unbiased group and it dosent matter there veiws with a large enough sample size that data becomes irrelevant and it becomes an overall scale Close your browser, grab a comb, and a handful of clothes. Lay out your wardrobe, decide what YOU like out of it, and simply be confident in what you look like the next day. y'know you are kinda hypocritical to me you say you're not narcissistic but you are telling everyone else that they ARE in some shape or form wich technically means you're better than everyone else and then makes you the narcissist I'm what's known as a devils advocate, taking the opposite of the average, to cause people to get their brains working instead of sitting in their normalcy, assuming that everything should stay as is, without any backing, or turning against them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:27 am
Atrasententia Kingrussel Atrasententia And once again, your last statement negates everything you just said. And your counter point. Why reply? ♥ Why? Because I can~ I'll take this as a submission then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
