|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:15 am
Midus is secretly a manchild who spends all his spare time playing with action figures and Legos.
"Sir, it's time to announce the next round of matches--"
"CAN'T YOU SEE I'M BUSY HERE? DELEGATE IT TO SOMEBODY ELSE. I HAVE TO BUILD THIS GIANT CASTLE OUT OF LEGOS."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:20 am
It was kinda gross, luckily it wasn't mangled into a mess of feathers and flesh, it looked a lot like one of those small bird tree decorations, just soaked in slobber. If anything was sicking it was the "crack", the hollow bird bones have a recognizable and distinct crack that you know the moment its heard.
Now i got to worry about checking the dog's mouth each time it goes outside, make sure it doesn't catch any more poor little creatures
In addition!!!
WTF is wrong with building Lego castles!!! u suggesting Lego is not the most manliest of activities!? CAUSE IT IS!!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:45 am
******** ******** keeps ******** me to the point that I cant post.
I'll have one up tonight hopefully.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:51 am
I like PP's take on Midas.  Big ol' basket full of bones and guts.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 1:51 pm
Sokoya's grading format really makes it fun to judge scores now. All neat and tidy.
Also, these fights are easy to judge, too. We can probably have everything done by Monday or Tuesday, assuming the other two judges keep pace.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 2:47 pm
Give us a sneak peek?
Like maybe Sokoya's format without outing anyone's scores or something. That would be cool.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:20 pm
FIGHT NAME HERE FIGHT NAME HERE FIGHTER ONE
Roleplaying: X/3
Tactics: X/3
Conciseness: X/2
Damage: X/2
X/10
Bonus Points
Consistent Posting: X/1
Point Deductions
OOC Bashing: -X/5
Violation of Profile: -X/5
Absence: -X/3
KOed: -X/3
Killed Opponent: -X/5
Total: X/10
Comments:
FIGHTER TWO
Roleplaying: X/3
Tactics: X/3
Conciseness: X/2
Damage: X/2
X/10
Bonus Points
Consistent Posting: X/1
Point Deductions
OOC Bashing: -X/5
Violation of Profile: -X/5
Absence: -X/3
KOed: -X/3
Killed Opponent: -X/5
Total: X/10
Comments:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:23 pm
Okay, can you give us this SAME THING but with Samayou Tamashii vs. BearvsBaby filled out ^.^? The Female of the Species FIGHT NAME HERE FIGHT NAME HERE FIGHTER ONE
Roleplaying: X/3
Tactics: X/3
Conciseness: X/2
Damage: X/2
X/10
Bonus Points
Consistent Posting: X/1
Point Deductions
OOC Bashing: -X/5
Violation of Profile: -X/5
Absence: -X/3
KOed: -X/3
Killed Opponent: -X/5
Total: X/10
Comments:
FIGHTER TWO
Roleplaying: X/3
Tactics: X/3
Conciseness: X/2
Damage: X/2
X/10
Bonus Points
Consistent Posting: X/1
Point Deductions
OOC Bashing: -X/5
Violation of Profile: -X/5
Absence: -X/3
KOed: -X/3
Killed Opponent: -X/5
Total: X/10
Comments:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:24 pm
I didn't even bother with one for his fight.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:31 pm
I don't see how that format is any different from anything else that's been in use, besides listing out all the deductions instead of just putting in the ones that apply.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:32 pm
Oh, cool. That's really neat. Tidy I mean, but interesting to I suppose.
Looks like we're going to see some interesting totals.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:35 pm
I unno either.
But we all know Molestia is just a fun hater.
|
 |
 |
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:37 pm
Nah, it still just amazes me how common sense isn't common. =(
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:40 pm
Yeah. The only thing about it is that the death deduction is pretty hefty due to how low the point values are. I'm not really arguing it, I just didn't know that it was going to be that severe in the grading process. Figured it was more of a "as it happens we look to see if people need to be DQ'd" type thing.
Not sure if you guys are going to break it down into fractions. A 2.25 or 1.5 score would be annoying. I know the troubles of balancing lower numbers though if you only do whole numbers because if something is wishy washy you're gonna end up going a bit too far one way or the other.
By interesting though... well I grabbed a random fight and did a fast and dirty job of it and came up with the scores 5 to 4. Those are interestingly small numbers.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:42 pm
Its ok KB, how awesome our fight was will make up for us temporarily killing each other.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|