|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 8:44 am
.
This place really is dead... confused
o.o
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:06 am
Very much so...not surprising seeing as it effectively has a one man mod team
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:58 pm
.
That shouldn;t make any difference....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:13 am
.
Is this EVER going to be reinstated? If not, I think i shall just leave... confused
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:35 am
It seems unlikely. Simon has buggered off, I don't have the time to do much mod-work, and I have no new work to post, so unless other members decide to post, there is nothing much I can do.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:58 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:00 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:05 am
Just because you can define something doesn't mean it's simple. What has defining have to do with something being simple?
Those who have experienced it know what it is. Those who have not will never know unless they do.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:07 am
Miyaz Just because you can define something doesn't mean it's simple. What has defining have to do with something being simple?
Those who have experienced it know what it is. Those who have not will never know unless they do. Then how can it be simple?
And where are the lines between love, lust, friendship etc?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:12 am
and_solo_said Miyaz Just because you can define something doesn't mean it's simple. What has defining have to do with something being simple?
Those who have experienced it know what it is. Those who have not will never know unless they do. Then how can it be simple?
And where are the lines between love, lust, friendship etc? Why can't something be simple in our mind. Not as you are suggesting, with words. Once you bring thought and direct it into words nothing is simple anymore. There always is some aspect of your argument to rebut.
I believe that Love is simple because it is a feeling that can be vividly realised and seen (in the mind's eye) by the person whom is 'in love'.
If you do not understand such feelings/emotions/ideas then you can be classified as one whom has not experienced love before, hence this discussion would be invalid as you're understanding of 'love' is not complete.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:14 am
Miyaz and_solo_said Miyaz Just because you can define something doesn't mean it's simple. What has defining have to do with something being simple?
Those who have experienced it know what it is. Those who have not will never know unless they do. Then how can it be simple?
And where are the lines between love, lust, friendship etc? Why can't something be simple in our mind. Not as you are suggesting, with words. Once you bring thought and direct it into words nothing is simple anymore. There always is some aspect of your argument to rebut.
I believe that Love is simple because it is a feeling that can be vividly realised and seen (in the mind's eye) by the person whom is 'in love'.
If you do not understand such feelings/emotions/ideas then you can be classified as one whom has not experienced love before, hence this discussion would be invalid as you're understanding of 'love' is not complete. Galant things have been done for love. Atrocities have been commited for it. For any emotion to drive anyone to such extremes it cannot be simple.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:16 am
Incedentally, are you a member of the Romantics Society?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:19 am
and_solo_said Miyaz and_solo_said Miyaz Just because you can define something doesn't mean it's simple. What has defining have to do with something being simple?
Those who have experienced it know what it is. Those who have not will never know unless they do. Then how can it be simple?
And where are the lines between love, lust, friendship etc? Why can't something be simple in our mind. Not as you are suggesting, with words. Once you bring thought and direct it into words nothing is simple anymore. There always is some aspect of your argument to rebut.
I believe that Love is simple because it is a feeling that can be vividly realised and seen (in the mind's eye) by the person whom is 'in love'.
If you do not understand such feelings/emotions/ideas then you can be classified as one whom has not experienced love before, hence this discussion would be invalid as you're understanding of 'love' is not complete. Galant things have been done for love. Atrocities have been commited for it. For any emotion to drive anyone to such extremes it cannot be simple. Why? Love is simple because it overrides the commitments of oneself. You love. And thus you do all you can to keep that love. Is that so hard to understand? Love is simple; it binds people together, it is, you can put it 'addictive'.
You love because you want to love, thus you do everything in your power to love. It's a simple concept.
I don't join many guilds so no, i'm not a member of the Romantics Society.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:25 am
Miyaz and_solo_said Miyaz and_solo_said Miyaz Just because you can define something doesn't mean it's simple. What has defining have to do with something being simple?
Those who have experienced it know what it is. Those who have not will never know unless they do. Then how can it be simple?
And where are the lines between love, lust, friendship etc? Why can't something be simple in our mind. Not as you are suggesting, with words. Once you bring thought and direct it into words nothing is simple anymore. There always is some aspect of your argument to rebut.
I believe that Love is simple because it is a feeling that can be vividly realised and seen (in the mind's eye) by the person whom is 'in love'.
If you do not understand such feelings/emotions/ideas then you can be classified as one whom has not experienced love before, hence this discussion would be invalid as you're understanding of 'love' is not complete. Galant things have been done for love. Atrocities have been commited for it. For any emotion to drive anyone to such extremes it cannot be simple. Why? Love is simple because it overrides the commitments of oneself. You love. And thus you do all you can to keep that love. Is that so hard to understand? Love is simple; it binds people together, it is, you can put it 'addictive'.
You love because you want to love, thus you do everything in your power to love. It's a simple concept.
I don't join many guilds so no, i'm not a member of the Romantics Society. But love is not simply the feeling of love, it is, as is everything else, relative to situation. The fact that any man would be driven to galantry or evil would illustrate that love, in a social context, is not a simple matter. Nor is the feeling easy to understand for everyone, as love is a many pronged star. Love between friends and comrades, the love between a man and a woman (excuse the homo-exclusive expression, but it is what I am used to saying), the love between children and their parents. There is irreperable damage to these loves if borders are crosses (e.g. incest *shudder*)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:28 am
*Goes offline to finish Biology homework*
Good evening.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|