|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:36 pm
Umuu...
This is a tough call...
On the plus side, We nab a mafia and dont waste a vote.
Worst case scenario on voting wrong or not lynching at all, were minus two townies minimum...
Wait, I should go check on how many rogues there are...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:38 pm
Finished reading through the thread.
Most of Med's posts struck me as being similar to his and Cookie's interactions in the Spam Can. I really don't know how to feel about him.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problematic briefcase Crew
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:42 pm
Thought we were on day two, but I didn't edit, I remembered before hitting Submit. I don't mind voting for the night. It's day two ******** I hate. Pretty much had a somewhat longer post about how much I hate ******** around and how I would vote but I would be uneasy about it. lolo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:44 pm
|
problematic briefcase Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:46 pm
Hashire Kazemeijin Making myself useful in the lull of day one and keeping tally.Med - 1 (Wylr) Night - 2 (Rawk | Shiny Haru) Right?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:48 pm
l-Kathulu-l Cabron the Swan 
Not that it matters, since I'm pretty sure we need a majority to solidify anything.True, but people also seem to be agreed to vote for Med if he can't defend himself. I don't want to, but I may vote if it starts heading that way. But for now I'll remain dormant on the vote I don't see any landslide agreement to lynch Med. Are you sure this plan was discussed...
 in the thread? wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problematic briefcase Crew
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:52 pm
Cabron the Swan l-Kathulu-l Cabron the Swan 
Not that it matters, since I'm pretty sure we need a majority to solidify anything.True, but people also seem to be agreed to vote for Med if he can't defend himself. I don't want to, but I may vote if it starts heading that way. But for now I'll remain dormant on the vote I don't see any landslide agreement to lynch Med. Are you sure this plan was discussed...
 in the thread? wink He means the people who posted about how they want to hear Med's defense. It can be easily implied that if they WANT to hear it first, that if they don't, they'll vote for him.
He's probably having surprise buttsecks though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:58 pm
Shiny Gligar Cabron the Swan l-Kathulu-l Cabron the Swan 
Not that it matters, since I'm pretty sure we need a majority to solidify anything.True, but people also seem to be agreed to vote for Med if he can't defend himself. I don't want to, but I may vote if it starts heading that way. But for now I'll remain dormant on the vote I don't see any landslide agreement to lynch Med. Are you sure this plan was discussed...
 in the thread? wink He means the people who posted about how they want to hear Med's defense. It can be easily implied that if they WANT to hear it first, that if they don't, they'll vote for him.
He's probably having surprise buttsecks though.
Generally the implications are the opposite; keep him around until he has the opportunity to defend himself to avoid a hasty decision. Why do you think the Mafia tend to lurk anyway?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problematic briefcase Crew
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:01 pm
Looking back, and assuming that if they want a defense and don't get one that they will vote on Med, there was five other people excluding Wylr who wants to hear Med's defense. Stag even said she'll vote him if he doesn't defend. I dunno.
Kath said he'd bandwagon though. I'm not too worried about this as it is a very long Day One. Hell, I meta-bandwagoned. We always vote no lynch for Day one. :I I'll be more worried if he keeps this attitude up though. The sheep would follow the wolf if he dressed like the herder. Meaning that bandwagoning is never okay. :/
Although, Wylr's vote is based almost entirely on the fact that Medeus is conversing a lot more when I'm almost positive this is the first time both Medeus and Cookie have played a mafia together. Or at least played together when they are gaying it up :D
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:01 pm
Read through thread. FoS Wylr.Wylr's been pushing hard for Med to be lynched, and I'm pretty damn certain that he was just playing along with what I was doing/saying, with no ulterior motives. Keep in mind that I started the conversations and was really leading. Besides, it's the first time we've really been in a mafia together, what did you think was going to happen? WylrPnufh I just wanted SOMETHING to happen on day 1. This strikes me as odd. Yes, they might kill off two people. But if we act now without any substantial information, we'd most likely be adding to our losses. This would be fine if it wasn't compounded by his actions before, even prematurely voting Med to be lynched. It almost sounds like he wants to kill off someone just to be rid of one more player, whether it be townie or opposite mafia.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Sharkbutt The Orgiastic Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problematic briefcase Crew
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:04 pm
Cabron the Swan Shiny Gligar Cabron the Swan l-Kathulu-l Cabron the Swan 
Not that it matters, since I'm pretty sure we need a majority to solidify anything.True, but people also seem to be agreed to vote for Med if he can't defend himself. I don't want to, but I may vote if it starts heading that way. But for now I'll remain dormant on the vote I don't see any landslide agreement to lynch Med. Are you sure this plan was discussed...
 in the thread? wink He means the people who posted about how they want to hear Med's defense. It can be easily implied that if they WANT to hear it first, that if they don't, they'll vote for him.
He's probably having surprise buttsecks though.
Generally the implications are the opposite; keep him around until he has the opportunity to defend himself to avoid a hasty decision. Why do you think the Mafia tend to lurk anyway? That's true. I mean, a simple FoS would be enough to get a defense from Medeus, whatever he needs to defend. O:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:06 pm
Day ends in two hours (or if you people get off your a** and reach a majority of some sort).
Get your PMs in.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:07 pm
Guys! I have a plan! Vote by role! That way you will kill them without knowing their identity! Foolproof!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:08 pm
Owwin Guys! I have a plan! Vote by role! That way you will kill them without knowing their identity! Foolproof! GENIUS
|
 |
 |
|
|
Sharkbutt The Orgiastic Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:09 pm
Zephyrkitty Finished reading through the thread. Most of Med's posts struck me as being similar to his and Cookie's interactions in the Spam Can. I really don't know how to feel about him. Why is everyone so suspicious of the post he made specifically towards Cookie? Those are normal homoerotic posts. Am I the only one suspicious of his game related posts? Med normally seems a little post-happy and 'one step behind', but he's really playing up the ignorance card in here and I'm not buying it. Everyone, do yourselves a favor; stop thinking about Cookies p***s and take a look all the GAME RELATED posts. We're not going to find scum by examining joke posts. That goes for everyone's posts, not just Med's.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|