|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:04 pm
gonk
Thank you so much Tohma for taking care of things while I was on vaccation. I wondered if this thread would get flooded or nothing at all. But either way I'm back. But both will still be answering. w00tz.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 5:19 pm
ok last turn i played necromancer's magemark.then i play strands of undeath and i block you attacking creatuere. which effect would i use if i had the black mana to spare?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:27 am
uh... It's not a real question per say....
You can either regenerate the creature to stop it from dying or let it go back to your hand. It's up to you. confused
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:24 pm
What effect does Double Strike have for blocking creatures?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:23 pm
fk3241 What effect does Double Strike have for blocking creatures? the exact same as it does for attacking creatures. They will deal damage to the creature they blocked during the first strike damage step then again during the regular combat damage step 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:36 pm
if a creature you enchant is destrode what happens to the enchantment?im a noob ok. if this card was a target of a card that removes it from play would it be removed?  heres another one what does it mean when it says play do i have to pay the mana cost?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:16 pm
Question 1: The enchantment sees it's not attached to anything and falls off the next time state-based effects are checked. (Which is basically whenever a player gets priority)
Question 2: Yes, he'd be removed from the game. Indestructibility stops lethal damage and "destroy" effects, not RFG or -X/-X.
Question 3: You have to pay the mana cost. It's assumed that you do, unless the card says otherwise. (For example, Sins of the Past from Ravnica reads, in part, "play that card without paying it's mana cost".)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:54 pm
im counfused about the anwser about the enchantment
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:18 pm
The enchantment is put into a graveyard because it's supposed to be enchanting something and isn't.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:35 pm
This may already have been answered already, but I'll ask anyway. So one of my friends says that each replicated spell triggers Wee Dragonauts ability. Another one says that it doesn't. So which one is right?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 5:25 am
The one who says it doesn't. The replications of a spell are never played, they're put directly on the stack, so the Dragonaut doesn't see them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:22 pm
when was the samurai introduced was bushido a abilty with it and  with this card would you ask before playing it?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:25 pm
The creature type "samurai" was introduced in Champions of Kamigawa and yes the 'ability' bushido was around on some cards but the keyword Mechanic "Bushido" came with the Champions of Kamigawa set as well.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 11:26 am
Lord Yawgmoth The creature type "samurai" was introduced in Champions of Kamigawa and yes the 'ability' bushido was around on some cards but the keyword Mechanic "Bushido" came with the Champions of Kamigawa set as well. ok but what about these card would you ask before playing it? is there a limited number? should i say pick a number 1-...?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 1:43 pm
The opponent chooses any number they like, as long as it's non-fractional and greater than zero. You can't make them choose from a specific set, alhough, they most likely won't pick one higher than their life total.. Then you choose what they do with it. For example, ay they pick "three". Then you get to decide whether they lose three life or sacrifice all of their permanents except three.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|