|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:43 pm
duckmasta Would it be wrong for me to interject and state for the record..."I am a proud member of the Jedi Church. Yes, it is a legitimately recognized religion and I humbly support it with every midichlorian in my being." ? Yes? Well too bad, I activate my illegal powers of hacking. Auto-hit enabled! Of course it wouldn't be wrong. But are you really? (If you dont mind me asking). I have heard of the Jedi religion as a recognized religion, but have never looked into it.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:46 pm
Gregar828 iSix-kun *feels Greg ending the convo so I must say this fast* While I am a christian (non denomination) I agree with havik. You see a topic that you think I will deem inappropriate and stop, so your reaction.........is to post as fast as you can in it before I stop it? I'm sorry, but that's...........Do I NEED to go into whats wrong with that? (DISCLAIMER: Rhetorical question. Take a lap Farley. And take Wheezy with you) I fixed it. ( Please don't get mad Gregar828. ) @ duckmasta That and the Klingon church must either make their shows creators so happy, or so sad that they made a tv series/movie that created a loyal following to the point they created a church about random things they said in their movies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:49 pm
@ Six not well xD
@ Greg: I like how you nit picked at one piece of my post you could defend but left the rest of my argument which you had nothing to combat with completely alone. Nice move, plenty of people agree with me and because my opinion might hurt one or two people feeling does not matter to me.
I was blunt, I said what I thought the way I thought it with out covering it with BS I don't care about. If someone has a problem with my sig they can feel free to send me a P.M. and ask me questions instead of jumping to conclusions about things.
I am no more attacking that group of people than they are attacking anyone who doesn't put that in the sig, they are just doing it in a nicer way but it make it ok right? When someone who does believe in god and follows the bible likes there sig because it has something cute in it. Then they see the one these people put up about how they love god blah blah blah, the person reading it is made to feel bad because they don't have it in there sig and most change it like a bunch of clones. If my sig gets one person to stop having that crap in there sig and doing something cool then I am happy. Since that has already happen I am going to use it untill I feel I should change it.
Or until I am forced between chose between my sig and being part of a guild I enjoy most of the time because some one feeling got hurt, even tho plenty of people agree with me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:53 pm
Gregar828 Hinote Tosatsu The only thing in it that I really see as a possible attack is the religious few bit. Other than that, it's pretty much just an attack on chain signatures, and on some level, a statement against having to prove you're a christian by spamming it everywhere. I'm focusing more on the fact that it attacks chain signatures than the fact that it attacks religion, because it attacks people who put their religion in their signature, not a specific religion. If it did, that would be an instant Ougoun for slandering of religion. Want me to take ougoun off his leash again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:54 pm
-o-Havik-o- @ Six not well xD
@ Greg: I like how you nit picked at one piece of my post you could defend but left the rest of my argument which you had nothing to combat with completely alone. Nice move, plenty of people agree with me and because my opinion might hurt one or two people feeling does not matter to me.
I was blunt, I said what I thought the way I thought it with out covering it with BS I don't care about. If someone has a problem with my sig they can feel free to send me a P.M. and ask me questions instead of jumping to conclusions about things.
I am no more attacking that group of people than they are attacking anyone who doesn't put that in the sig, they are just doing it in a nicer way but it make it ok right? When someone who does believe in god and follows the bible likes there sig because it has something cute in it. Then they see the one these people put up about how they love god blah blah blah, the person reading it is made to feel bad because they don't have it in there sig and most change it like a bunch of clones. If my sig gets one person to stop having that crap in there sig and doing something cool then I am happy. Since that has already happen I am going to use it untill I feel I should change it.
Or until I am forced between chose between my sig and being part of a guild I enjoy most of the time because some one feeling got hurt, even tho plenty of people agree with me. THIS is why I accepted. It just makes the rest of us feel kinda akward, or at least me. And if you ever play zombies richtofen is where that quote came from. Just look at my new sig.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:03 pm
I love it.... Now I want to make a sig about the grim reaper from conquers bad fur day and those bloody cats xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:05 pm
little mintchan Gregar828 Hinote Tosatsu The only thing in it that I really see as a possible attack is the religious few bit. Other than that, it's pretty much just an attack on chain signatures, and on some level, a statement against having to prove you're a christian by spamming it everywhere. I'm focusing more on the fact that it attacks chain signatures than the fact that it attacks religion, because it attacks people who put their religion in their signature, not a specific religion. If it did, that would be an instant Ougoun for slandering of religion. Want me to take ougoun off his leash again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:08 pm
-o-Havik-o- @ Six not well xD
@ Greg: I like how you nit picked at one piece of my post you could defend but left the rest of my argument which you had nothing to combat with completely alone. Nice move, plenty of people agree with me and because my opinion might hurt one or two people feeling does not matter to me.
I was blunt, I said what I thought the way I thought it with out covering it with BS I don't care about. If someone has a problem with my sig they can feel free to send me a P.M. and ask me questions instead of jumping to conclusions about things.
I am no more attacking that group of people than they are attacking anyone who doesn't put that in the sig, they are just doing it in a nicer way but it make it ok right? When someone who does believe in god and follows the bible likes there sig because it has something cute in it. Then they see the one these people put up about how they love god blah blah blah, the person reading it is made to feel bad because they don't have it in there sig and most change it like a bunch of clones. If my sig gets one person to stop having that crap in there sig and doing something cool then I am happy. Since that has already happen I am going to use it untill I feel I should change it.
Or until I am forced between chose between my sig and being part of a guild I enjoy most of the time because some one feeling got hurt, even tho plenty of people agree with me. Left the rest of the argument? I was pretty sure that my post encompassed all that had to be said. Honestly, I don't know what you're referring to when you say that I failed to address part of your post. Could you please direct me to which part I failed to address, and I would be happy to do so. As for this post, I've already said it: This is not bluntness, this is being rude. Yes, you ARE attacking a group of people, in a MUCh worse way than anyone who has the "I believe in god..." signature. The people with those christian banners are not saying "If you don't have this in your sig you are obviously going to hell." They are saying that they believe in their chosen deity, and they want to see if anyone else of their chosen faith is willing to express that faith. It's not (intentionally) trying to make anyone feel bad, its simply showing a person's views on religion. This signature, however, states "If you post something like that in your signature, you are obviously an uncreative jerk whom I hate." Now THAT would be better to keep to yourself than a statement of your religious views. It directly attacks people who want to show their faith. (NOTE: I should probably throw this in, this can apply to any sort of chain post. I'm just continually referencing faith because this directly ties into that). If you don't like a person's signature for no better reason that "it pisses me off", then you really have no grounds to say that no one cares about their views, least of all God. Besides, most of the time, that isn't the ONLY thing in their signature, it's usually added on to another, original signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:09 pm
little mintchan Gregar828 Hinote Tosatsu The only thing in it that I really see as a possible attack is the religious few bit. Other than that, it's pretty much just an attack on chain signatures, and on some level, a statement against having to prove you're a christian by spamming it everywhere. I'm focusing more on the fact that it attacks chain signatures than the fact that it attacks religion, because it attacks people who put their religion in their signature, not a specific religion. If it did, that would be an instant Ougoun for slandering of religion. Want me to take ougoun off his leash again? Please, I'm trying to make a serious statement, that isn't helping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:15 pm
Gregar828 little mintchan Gregar828 Hinote Tosatsu The only thing in it that I really see as a possible attack is the religious few bit. Other than that, it's pretty much just an attack on chain signatures, and on some level, a statement against having to prove you're a christian by spamming it everywhere. I'm focusing more on the fact that it attacks chain signatures than the fact that it attacks religion, because it attacks people who put their religion in their signature, not a specific religion. If it did, that would be an instant Ougoun for slandering of religion. Want me to take ougoun off his leash again? Please, I'm trying to make a serious statement, that isn't helping. Then take it as a joke and roll your eyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:15 pm
All this talk of religion and no one even takes the time to think about it all. Why does it all matter in the first place? Who even thought up religion in the first place and what did he wish to accomplish by it? I bet he's frowning up with anger that we're arguing about it even now. WHy not just all hold hands eh? Nah that would be sissy-ish. At anyrate we should all just agree to disagree before yet another pothead quits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:16 pm
little mintchan Gregar828 little mintchan Gregar828 Hinote Tosatsu The only thing in it that I really see as a possible attack is the religious few bit. Other than that, it's pretty much just an attack on chain signatures, and on some level, a statement against having to prove you're a christian by spamming it everywhere. I'm focusing more on the fact that it attacks chain signatures than the fact that it attacks religion, because it attacks people who put their religion in their signature, not a specific religion. If it did, that would be an instant Ougoun for slandering of religion. Want me to take ougoun off his leash again? Please, I'm trying to make a serious statement, that isn't helping. Then take it as a joke and roll your eyes *grabs the joke* rolleyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:19 pm
iSix-kun All this talk of religion and no one even takes the time to think about it all. Why does it all matter in the first place? Who even thought up religion in the first place and what did he wish to accomplish by it? I bet he's frowning up with anger that we're arguing about it even now. WHy not just all hold hands eh? Nah that would be sissy-ish. At anyrate we should all just agree to disagree before yet another pothead quits. Please, DO NOT turn this into a religious debate. I get enough of that already, and the focused topic right now is not religion, but personal choices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:26 pm
The fact you wont even own up to ignoring half my post with out me going back and pointing it out to you like a child is why I am going to drink and watch my gf play plants vs zombies while I finish dinner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:28 pm
Gregar828 iSix-kun All this talk of religion and no one even takes the time to think about it all. Why does it all matter in the first place? Who even thought up religion in the first place and what did he wish to accomplish by it? I bet he's frowning up with anger that we're arguing about it even now. W Hy not just all hold hands eh? Nah that would be sissy-ish. At anyrate we should all just agree to disagree before yet another pothead quits.Please, DO NOT turn this into a religious debate. I get enough of that already, and the focused topic right now is not religion, but personal choices. Religion is a personal choice. Did you not see, not read, or just disregard the end of that post for argument's sake?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
