|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:13 pm
Or the Hatake bloodline banner for PotS.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:15 pm
Gregar828 I...........I don't. People can put what they want into a Gaia signature, be it religious beliefs, a guild signature, or a Grammar Nazi emblem. That signature pretty much says "We don't want to know your beliefs, we dont want your kind here, go away." Quite spiteful, actually. agreed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:19 pm
Gregar828 I...........I don't. People can put what they want into a Gaia signature, be it religious beliefs, a guild signature, or a Grammar Nazi emblem. That signature pretty much says "We don't want to know your beliefs, we dont want your kind here, go away." Quite spiteful, actually. I like it actually. It's directly challenging people who make their signatures that basically say "If you don't add this to your signature you're a pagan and are going to hell.". Those are just plain annoying, and he's pointing that out. It's not saying to stop showing their beliefs, it's saying to stop trying to force others to show theirs too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hinote Tosatsu Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:29 pm
Gregar828 I...........I don't. People can put what they want into a Gaia signature, be it religious beliefs, a guild signature, or a Grammar Nazi emblem. That signature pretty much says "We don't want to know your beliefs, we dont want your kind here, go away." Quite spiteful, actually.
You of all people should have known I was being blunt and not mean seeing as people make the same mistake about half the things you post. Guess I was wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:30 pm
Hinote Tosatsu Gregar828 I...........I don't. People can put what they want into a Gaia signature, be it religious beliefs, a guild signature, or a Grammar Nazi emblem. That signature pretty much says "We don't want to know your beliefs, we dont want your kind here, go away." Quite spiteful, actually. I like it actually. It's directly challenging people who make their signatures that basically say "If you don't add this to your signature you're a pagan and are going to hell.". Those are just plain annoying, and he's pointing that out. It's not saying to stop showing their beliefs, it's saying to stop trying to force others to show theirs too. I do not think that that is what they are saying. They are encouraging other christians, like themselves, to have that in their banner to show that they are all united by Christ. But not all of them do it. I consider myself to be a fairly devout Catholic, yet I don't have a signature like that. Besides, there's nothing stopping an Atheist, Jew, Muslim, or any other religion to have a signature like that. But this signature directly attacks those people, not specifically because their Christians, but because they have something in their signature that Havik doesn't like, which is why I don't like it. But I'll allow it to remain, unless I receive evidence that someone quit the guild because of it. (Which may happen).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:30 pm
I was thinking Double D rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:32 pm
*feels Greg ending the convo so I must say this fast*
While I am a christian (non denomination) I agree with havik.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:33 pm
-o-Havik-o- Gregar828 I...........I don't. People can put what they want into a Gaia signature, be it religious beliefs, a guild signature, or a Grammar Nazi emblem. That signature pretty much says "We don't want to know your beliefs, we dont want your kind here, go away." Quite spiteful, actually.
You of all people should have known I was being blunt and not mean seeing as people make the same mistake about half the things you post. Guess I was wrong.This is not the type of bluntness I use, which is telling people something is wrong without sugarcoating it, without taking into consideration how they may react to my "tone". This signature directly attacks a group of people you don't like because they put certain things in their signature. That's not bluntness, that's just being rude and hurtful, and being quite direct about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:34 pm
-o-Havik-o- I was thinking Double D rofl XD do you play black ops?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hinote Tosatsu Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:37 pm
The only thing in it that I really see as a possible attack is the religious few bit. Other than that, it's pretty much just an attack on chain signatures, and on some level, a statement against having to prove you're a christian by spamming it everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:38 pm
iSix-kun *feels Greg ending the convo so I must say this fast* While I am a christian (non denomination) I agree with havik. You see a topic that you think I will deem inappropriate and stop, so your reaction.........is to post as fast as you can in it before I stop it? I'm sorry, but that's...........Do I NEED to go into whats wrong with that? (DISCLAIMER: That was a rhetorical question, don't answer it)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:40 pm
XD rofl saw that one coming, and the disclaimer killed my attempt at further comedic comments. IN OTHER NEWS.
My sig is better than Havik's.... and everyone elses!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:40 pm
Would it be wrong for me to interject and state for the record..."I am a proud member of the Jedi Church. Yes, it is a legitimately recognized religion and I humbly support it with every midichlorian in my being." ? Yes? Well too bad, I activate my illegal powers of hacking. Auto-hit enabled!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:41 pm
Hinote Tosatsu The only thing in it that I really see as a possible attack is the religious few bit. Other than that, it's pretty much just an attack on chain signatures, and on some level, a statement against having to prove you're a christian by spamming it everywhere. I'm focusing more on the fact that it attacks chain signatures than the fact that it attacks religion, because it attacks people who put their religion in their signature, not a specific religion. If it did, that would be an instant Ougoun for slandering of religion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
