|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 8:45 am
SOME grinding is okay. I do like to feel that I'm making progress, though, and... well... I tend to play solo. ^^;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 8:49 am
And Rednal, Imma have to stature that one out for you, but it will be worked out. (I am not a good Backstory person, and it takes me a good while to think of an elaborate background.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 8:51 am
Powers and skillsets shouldn't exist randomly. ^^ There should be an appropriate reason for them and why they're present. Also, classes really ought to be distinct from one another, and... well... these demon-eaters looked a lot like normal demons to me. ^^;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 8:55 am
I guess the feeling of true progress was a little lacking. And playing solo can be rather difficult.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 8:55 am
Rednal Powers and skillsets shouldn't exist randomly. ^^ There should be an appropriate reason for them and why they're present. Also, classes really ought to be distinct from one another, and... well... these demon-eaters looked a lot like normal demons to me. ^^; "You are what you eat"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 8:56 am
I liked the feels Imagine had, it was just that I found the grinding process first-hand how difficult it was.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 9:02 am
That's not a reason for the powers to exist. = w= There needs to be an actual idea behind it, not simply a quote. How does it fit into the existing world, and why should anyone care about it?
And with that, Imma go do some other stuff. ^^
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 9:03 am
I guess I'll play some games for a while and go to bed, then. o wo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 9:27 am
The original idea was that he could gain a singular power from the enemies that he ate, but he could only gain 1 power from a powerful demon (Demon Skill)
As for why he exists, I haven't had enough thought on it to give a good explanation.(Back stories are my bane)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 10:00 am
Zorc James The original idea was that he could gain a singular power from the enemies that he ate, but he could only gain 1 power from a powerful demon (Demon Skill) As for why he exists, I haven't had enough thought on it to give a good explanation.(Back stories are my bane) The Whole IDEA behind Atma is eating Demons to get Stronger. A demon eating other demons is just a Demon that eats demons. It's more likely [and definitely safer for your demon] if he just has his starting skill, instead of trying to devour demons for new skills. New or otherwise. And Definitely nothing permanent, or it would get out of hand fast.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Hopeful Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 10:11 am
Eating demons is not, in and of itself, notable. XD; I already have more than one character that does that. For a class, with powers, there needs to be a bit more... plot-relevant substance, not just the desire for cool powers, know what I mean?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 10:22 am
Necromonium Zorc James The original idea was that he could gain a singular power from the enemies that he ate, but he could only gain 1 power from a powerful demon (Demon Skill) As for why he exists, I haven't had enough thought on it to give a good explanation.(Back stories are my bane) The Whole IDEA behind Atma is eating Demons to get Stronger. A demon eating other demons is just a Demon that eats demons. It's more likely [and definitely safer for your demon] if he just has his starting skill, instead of trying to devour demons for new skills. New or otherwise. And Definitely nothing permanent, or it would get out of hand fast. I just saw Atma as mutated humans and not demons. And I saw Kiki-Jiki as more as a human who ate demons.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 3:27 pm
What would you guys consider a demon that is completely, in every context, unable to transform?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:39 pm
thank you, Stick. It may seem like a "Captain Obvious" Question, but I was seriously curious about it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|