|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:11 am
ChaosKnights Zero the Crimson Yeah...he's useful for a moment...then gets iced by a Saibaman..then it's all downhill from there. So do you watch the abridged series? Can't say that I have.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 10:11 am
It covers a lot of these points. It's very funny. I'd recommend checking it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 10:17 am
ChaosKnights It covers a lot of these points. It's very funny. I'd recommend checking it out. Ah, I see. I might just have to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:13 am
Zero the Crimson Ah, I see. I might just have to do that. There's currently only 37 episodes. All very amusing in their own way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:04 am
ChaosKnights Zero the Crimson Ah, I see. I might just have to do that. There's currently only 37 episodes. All very amusing in their own way. Well, a lot of Abridged series are...pending on the creators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 8:14 pm
Zero the Crimson Well, a lot of Abridged series are...pending on the creators. But they are worth the wait in seeing how they can be creatively twisted in an amusing way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:43 pm
ChaosKnights Zero the Crimson Well, a lot of Abridged series are...pending on the creators. But they are worth the wait in seeing how they can be creatively twisted in an amusing way. Creative twist, throwing parody upon parody for laughs, making things up as they go along...so long as it's amusing, it's all good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:07 pm
Zero the Crimson Creative twist, throwing parody upon parody for laughs, making things up as they go along...so long as it's amusing, it's all good. Yep And a new chapter for Denpa Kyoushi just came out. Nothing too interesting. But looks like sh*t is about to go down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:16 pm
ChaosKnights Zero the Crimson Creative twist, throwing parody upon parody for laughs, making things up as they go along...so long as it's amusing, it's all good. Yep And a new chapter for Denpa Kyoushi just came out. Nothing too interesting. But looks like sh*t is about to go down. Ah, thanks for telling me. I'll have to read it before I head to bed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:20 pm
Zero the Crimson Ah, thanks for telling me. I'll have to read it before I head to bed. Cool BTW, have you ever played internet multiplayer games?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:23 pm
ChaosKnights Zero the Crimson Ah, thanks for telling me. I'll have to read it before I head to bed. Cool BTW, have you ever played internet multiplayer games? I've played some typical turn based games like Chess. Other than that, the most I've played that involved multiple players on a computer, was zOMG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:28 pm
Zero the Crimson I've played some typical turn based games like Chess. Other than that, the most I've played that involved multiple players on a computer, was zOMG. In my case, I think multiplayer games are beginning to stress me out as I just seem to be a magnet for bad luck when getting a partner to play with in competitive battles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:32 pm
ChaosKnights In my case, I think multiplayer games are beginning to stress me out as I just seem to be a magnet for bad luck when getting a partner to play with in competitive battles. I've never actually played any that relied on a partner....well, at least not actually online. I use to play a game called Stronghold, where you had to build your fortress and conquer other fortresses, but I got stuck on the first mission where I had to work with another ruler (an NPC) who sucked at building defense, and didn't share any troops or money with me, despite the fact that I had both our forts completely protected and I needed more troops and money to successfully raid the enemies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:13 pm
Zero the Crimson I've never actually played any that relied on a partner....well, at least not actually online. I use to play a game called Stronghold, where you had to build your fortress and conquer other fortresses, but I got stuck on the first mission where I had to work with another ruler (an NPC) who sucked at building defense, and didn't share any troops or money with me, despite the fact that I had both our forts completely protected and I needed more troops and money to successfully raid the enemies. Well I'm not so lucky since my partners are actual people. I think the one game that pissed me off the most was when I was facing off against two other teams and I had the ability to win but my partner kept being a moron by making our opponents stronger. But the icing on the cake was when he kept dropping nukes inside our base killing batches of my troops and defenses. Afterwards I had to quit the match as I could not tolerate his incompetence any further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:39 am
ChaosKnights Well I'm not so lucky since my partners are actual people. I think the one game that pissed me off the most was when I was facing off against two other teams and I had the ability to win but my partner kept being a moron by making our opponents stronger. But the icing on the cake was when he kept dropping nukes inside our base killing batches of my troops and defenses. Afterwards I had to quit the match as I could not tolerate his incompetence any further. Yikes! That does sound like an irritating situation...then again, I'd have probably destroyed him after he amped the enemies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
