|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:17 pm
Hence the 'no more than two', Talencia. XD Most people have at least two Soq's. The majority of those who RP have more than two because they're into the RP... Some are into it for the horses but... Meh. I'm in it for the plotlines and the fun. The foals are just an added perk to having kickass RP with people I enjoy playing with.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:19 pm
[ Mialee ] Cajmera TheMadHatter i think the only perk you should get from bribes should be you get three baskets, you get to pick gender, and MAYBE you get to pick some colors.
other than that they shouldnt be different from normal breedings. But that IS how it works O.o They are the same otherwise, I think. Like, you c only keep one basket even though there are three. thats true but the point is if you bribe for 2 breeding slots, 2 different pairs and keep one from each breeding....which is not allowed in raffle slots..we think it should be the same, so I vote for being allowed to in raffle slots But they aren't necessarily at the same time; Shar and Nay did that, but I think it was because she paid with an OMG and not exact change. They didn't have to both be done at once... I just see the bribe breedings as being more in the realm of customs than true breedings, I suppose. On principal I don't care for the idea...but I see them as something very different from the raffle. @Hatter: That is a more sound plan, in my opinion. It's not as biased against those with fewer Soqs than the common perception of the current rule 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:21 pm
Okies being kicked off the comp. I'll check back later. Take care guys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:22 pm
Mm... I'm -pretty sure- that Shar sold her OMG to pay for the breedings. She didn't pay for the breedings with her OMG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:26 pm
generally people dont bribe for more than one breeding at a time, but the point is that they could do it. So technally someone could bribe for a handful and get a ton of baskets. It's very unlikly but it could happen. So to keep things fair the same rules should apply for both and i am inclied to say that the rules for keeping baskets for bribes is better.
I used to be one of thoes people with one Soq so i can see where it would SUCK to have people with like 10+ getting to enter all of them. Hell even having the 2 couples i want to have baskets eventually i'd be pissed if someone could enter more than that.
So 2 only gives people with more than one a single extra chance and since it's unlikly that they are going to get both in one raffle it's not all that bad. And come on, how long do people genenerally stay with only one Soq? XD (joking here)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:26 pm
Skye Starrfyre Mm... I'm -pretty sure- that Shar sold her OMG to pay for the breedings. She didn't pay for the breedings with her OMG. That might be it, then. I just remember the OMG being part of it XD sweatdrop Disregard prior statement @.@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:30 pm
TheMadHatter generally people dont bribe for more than one breeding at a time, but the point is that they could do it. So technally someone could bribe for a handful and get a ton of baskets. It's very unlikly but it could happen. So to keep things fair the same rules should apply for both and i am inclied to say that the rules for keeping baskets for bribes is better.
I used to be one of thoes people with one Soq so i can see where it would SUCK to have people with like 10+ getting to enter all of them. Hell even having the 2 couples i want to have baskets eventually i'd be pissed if someone could enter more than that.
So 2 only gives people with more than one a single extra chance and since it's unlikly that they are going to get both in one raffle it's not all that bad. And come on, how long do people genenerally stay with only one Soq? XD (joking here) A good plan; however, I think that for THIS batch of breedings the one-Soquili-per-person method should be followed, since there were more than a couple people who thought that was what the rule meant. But that would be a significantly less confusing method for the future! @.@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:33 pm
Cajmera A good plan; however, I think that for THIS batch of breedings the one-Soquili-per-person method should be followed, since there were more than a couple people who thought that was what the rule meant. But that would be a significantly less confusing method for the future! @.@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:34 pm
xd *of course, would be terribly amused by Joker/Harley babies*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:38 pm
oh they will have babies eventually
and if all goes well with plot (and i get my Mad Hatter cosplay) there will be Harley/Mad Hatter babies two >.>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:38 pm
TheMadHatter Cajmera A good plan; however, I think that for THIS batch of breedings the one-Soquili-per-person method should be followed, since there were more than a couple people who thought that was what the rule meant. But that would be a significantly less confusing method for the future! @.@ *shock* You mean that you entered for babies that you don't need? BLASHPHEMER! xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:39 pm
TheMadHatter oh they will have babies eventually
and if all goes well with plot (and i get my Mad Hatter cosplay) there will be Harley/Mad Hatter babies two >.> xD That would be hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:40 pm
"But I don't want to talk to someone that's mad!"
“Oh, you can't help that.” said the Cat: “we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.”
Best story ever! rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:43 pm
Considering that the on per was not adhered to last month per se in the listings, and has not been 'clearly stated' AS A RULE (so hence i dunno why people have been all over that) it shouldn't be forced, since the entire rule ends up screwing a lot fo people over in the end. =P With 12 slots it's not like anyone's hurt, NOR is it a fre-for-all of who has the most - odds are still aaginst you in all cases being a raffle.
Also, Meeki bribed for 4 breedings, Sirenz just did them one at a time - Starcandy/Minty, Samedi/Chaos, Allaraina/Spectre, and Maeryn/Rot.
The problem with a 1 soq/owner thing is that it screws over owners with a lot fo Soqs. (And sorry to say, but we have at least 8+ people off the top of my head with 6+ Soquili or MORE.)
Also, those 1 soq people, if they happen to RP/want to breed with soeoen with a lot fo Soqs? They're gonna get screwed if that other person with lots has an older couple with really bad luck. =P
Also, it's still one PAIR per owner, which basically causes one great loc k-down on slots - each owner only gets 1 entry still - and any future Soquili entered MUST be done via the owners of the mates, who use up their one chance, etc. It's still self-limiting. wink And then the OTHER owners of the matesof one with more Soqs... DO get chances to breed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
