|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:12 pm
Cale Darksun And CW, you do understand what the Devaronian is telling you right? Not exactly ... code of some sort?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:14 pm
Does anyone beside me think that even though they're supposedly "newer", Kennet's Acclamator has no chance against a new-wave Chiss SD? I know that my own ship is made up, an upgraded battle carrier isn't gonna do much damage...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:15 pm
Celestia Whitesword Cale Darksun And CW, you do understand what the Devaronian is telling you right? Not exactly ... code of some sort? He's saying that there is no jedi that goes by that name. Meaning Damon is either no longer a jedi, or he's living under an assumed name. Theres no jedi by the name of Damon Syricia.Savy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:16 pm
Hmm... Makes sense to me. Wait, he's flying an Acclamator? Aren't those what the Republic used about 150 years ago?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:17 pm
Cale Darksun Celestia Whitesword Cale Darksun And CW, you do understand what the Devaronian is telling you right? Not exactly ... code of some sort? He's saying that there is no jedi that goes by that name. Meaning Damon is either no longer a jedi, or he's living under an assumed name. Theres no jedi by the name of Damon Syricia.Savy? Makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:20 pm
An acclamator is basically about as much of a threat as a frigate could ever be.
It's more a missle cruiser than an actual frigate. Primary weaponry of proton torpedoes.
But the Stormhawk would easily take care of it. Plus, with you being in so much power, FP, you'd have complement escort ships as well, along with the SD you command.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:27 pm
Nelowulf An acclamator is basically about as much of a threat as a frigate could ever be. It's more a missle cruiser than an actual frigate. Primary weaponry of proton torpedoes. But the Stormhawk would easily take care of it. Plus, with you being in so much power, FP, you'd have complement escort ships as well, along with the SD you command. Wasn't the Acclamator's primry function a carrier for clones and arsenal?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:29 pm
Sounds right to me. Plus, a 150 year old ship isn't going to be in that good condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:29 pm
FrozenPhoenix32 Nelowulf An acclamator is basically about as much of a threat as a frigate could ever be. It's more a missle cruiser than an actual frigate. Primary weaponry of proton torpedoes. But the Stormhawk would easily take care of it. Plus, with you being in so much power, FP, you'd have complement escort ships as well, along with the SD you command. Wasn't the Acclamator's primry function a carrier for clones and arsenal? Key words: Assault frigate. It could land and deploy troops, but stronger than a simple transport.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:30 pm
elvisnake Sounds right to me. Plus, a 150 year old ship isn't going to be in that good condition. They're supposedly "new". So it's a reconditioned Acclamator...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:31 pm
Who's going around re-making Acclamators? Why not just build a bunch of Pellaeons?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:32 pm
elvisnake Who's going around re-making Acclamators? Why not just build a bunch of Pellaeons? Because he's an Imperial Captain who somehow managed to go from military to politician and now governs Wayland, where he builds Acclmators...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:32 pm
Hmm... I'd still rather have a Pellaeon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:33 pm
Plus paelleons are massive, and take years to really build, from my understanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
