|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:41 am
-Dessynea- But Dulnair voted for Zach and Dulnair was mafia. Why would he have thrown another mafia member under the bus? Like Allegro said, it's pretty early in the game for that sort of strategy, there's no logic behind it. He also voted no lynch. Allegro and I see things differently. If the mafia votes for the mafia then most of the people who voted to kill the mafia dude are safe. Kill off a mafioso early, establish trust in the town early. O WAIT IT DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT. I REMEMBER LAST GAME.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:46 am
Kuzodav -Dessynea- But Dulnair voted for Zach and Dulnair was mafia. Why would he have thrown another mafia member under the bus? Like Allegro said, it's pretty early in the game for that sort of strategy, there's no logic behind it. He also voted no lynch. Allegro and I see things differently. If the mafia votes for the mafia then most of the people who voted to kill the mafia dude are safe. Kill off a mafioso early, establish trust in the town early. O WAIT IT DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT. I REMEMBER LAST GAME.
A better point when playing with the idea of Dulanir voting for Zach would be that Dulnair was then killed by the town Force Feeder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:13 am
Kuzo, No Lynch can only benefit mafia. If there's no Lynch, Mafia gets it's kill, and town doesn't. if there's a force feeder on each side, they cancel eachother out, but mafia still has the +1 kill there. Sorry I'm not inactive and not taking shots like everyone else. Sorry you'd rather town just get picked off. I can see why you'd want that  Oh wait, why WOULD you want that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:15 am
I love these Phoenix Wright sprites.
I totally base my post tone around the one I'm gonna use, too. XDXD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:55 am
And this is why not voting first day works. We got a guy, suffered acceptable losses, and didn't vote off anyone critical (like the cop. Amirite Seph?)
Don't think we can go anywhere with the Dulnair/ Wylr connection, but I'm going to FoS Wylr. Why are you so positive that the mafia feeder was inactive? It's possible they could have been Doc-blocked. Unless you have some inside info?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:16 am
Allegro And this is why not voting first day works. We got a guy, suffered acceptable losses, and didn't vote off anyone critical (like the cop. Amirite Seph?) Don't think we can go anywhere with the Dulnair/ Wylr connection, but I'm going to FoS Wylr. Why are you so positive that the mafia feeder was inactive? It's possible they could have been Doc-blocked. Unless you have some inside info? Cause I didn't think of that And I am in no way positive of it. lolguys lets vote wylr for actually playing k?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:40 am
Nobody has voted yet, and you can't blame me for being thorough. Unless you're the only one allowed to make the "I'm just playing the game" defense?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:05 am
No, I'm not saying that.
I just feel like people think I'm suspicious cause I'm the only one not sitting around with a confused look going "WHAT DO?!?!" you know?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:14 am
It's mafia. EVERYBODY is suspicious, for different reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:14 am
No one is FOSing you for it though Allegro.
I enjoy this not quite band-wagoning though. Like Stag, Kuzo, and Allegro are all FOSing (well Stag only said she was suspicious she didn't actually FOS but the idea is there) Zach and with different reasons but reasons that are all kind of a stretch.
Stag's reason: Zach rando-voted. (And?)
Kuzo's reason: Zach has a lot to say. (so do other people, like Kuzo, Allegro, and Stag.)
Allegro's reason: Zach was speculating that the Mafia force feeder was inactive. (and yes the MFF's target could have been protected but assuming that gives us no leads, assuming the MFF was inactive gives us a direction to go in.)
Just saying, looks like some teamwork. And who would have team this early in the game other than mafia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:20 am
Speaking of teamwork, you seem to be rushing to Zach's defense quickly, considering nobody's put out a vote yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:24 am
I've been waiting for this point. Because really? When do I not rush to Zach's defense? I don't know if he is innocent or not, but if I am going to watch someone throw my boyfriend under the bus, I want some legit reasons.
I always stick up for him, in mafia games and out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:26 am
Plus, once a vote is cast, some people are hesitant to change their minds. I would rather make my points now then wait for later. A lot of people's active time is when I'm at work and can't contribute.
Speaking of, Zach and I will be out for a little while after I get home from work. Got to do some shopping, but we will still be home hours before end of day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:32 am
-Dessynea- I've been waiting for this point. Because really? When do I not rush to Zach's defense? I don't know if he is innocent or not, but if I am going to watch someone throw my boyfriend under the bus, I want some legit reasons.
I always stick up for him, in mafia games and out. Admirable, and cute, but it makes you a bit of a liability of you can't be objective in the game. For instance, as you pointed out, the three people who FoS'd Zach all have different reasons. Doesn't scream "teamwork!" to me. I'd keep an eye out for anybody who tries to turn one of these three arguments into an actual vote, though. That's more of a straight bandwagon then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:34 am
ys evry1 calling me zach tho?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
