|
|
| Do you eat meat? |
| Yes |
|
65% |
[ 117 ] |
| No |
|
34% |
[ 62 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:15 pm
Byaggha david, there's a small problem with your argument there: Regardless of what you consume, you are going to hurt or kill something. Even if it's only plants you eat, you're stopping something - be it bugs who were depending on the leaves, small mammals that are shoved out of the land they once lived in for fields, or even another person who could eat that, but had to help put it on a truck for you instead, something will suffer or die because you are eating. The simple act of consuming any resource will do this. It's not just meat that causes the issue. But karma involves INTENTIONAL actions. In being vegetarian, my intent is to prevent the death of sentient beings. In consuming a vegetarian diet, I am actually promoting LESS agriculture (because livestock require so much more than humans) hence, less harm to other animals. You are absolutely correct in that my consuming anything will cause suffering. But because my intent is wholesome (preventing harm to animals and the environment) my karma is wholesome. In other words, I am not karmically responsible for the suffering of animals and insects killed in the raising of crops because I have no intention of killing them, or in benefiting from their death. And the fact of others suffering being unavoidable should not be an excuse to avoid doing all that is possible to prevent it, or a rationalization to contribute to it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:31 pm
Master Shadow Kilo I remember seeing a quote that fit on this matter pretty well. It went something like this... "Choosing not to follow a spiritual path just because you disagree with one of the teachings is like being dehydrated and choosing not to drink from the river simply because you can't drink the whole river." The quote fits well because many people, almost including myself, would have turned away from Buddhism simply because we enjoy meat. Personally, I was raised on meat and I was taught that the consumption of meat is a part of the cycle of life. We, as humans, are omnivores. We rely on both meat and plants to survive. Without proper supplements, for which there are not many when giving up meat, our own bodies will suffer from neglecting certain sources of proteins and nutrients. Some people suffer more than others, but just about everyone suffers in some way even if they do not realize it. I stated elsewhere that vegetarianism is not requirement in Buddhadharma. But when one does things solely because they enjoy them, then they are feeding the cycle of craving that keeps them bound to samsara. I was raised on meat. My grandfather raised cattle, and I spent several years with him on his farm. He also hunted and fished, and some of my fondest memories of him are of us together fishing. However, there is NO nutrient in meat that cannot be found in a non meat food. Humans CAN eat and digest meat, but it is not a requirement for human existence, especially for those of us in the industrialized, developed world. I have been vegan for 20 years with no ill effect. My grandfather ate meat every day, usually 3 times a day, and still suffered the forms of anemia (both iron and B12 deficiencies) that I'm "supposed" to get from not eating animal products.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 5:56 am
davidm843 I stated elsewhere that vegetarianism is not requirement in Buddhadharma. But when one does things solely because they enjoy them, then they are feeding the cycle of craving that keeps them bound to samsara. True. 3nodding But what of people who actually do physically need meat? Said folk do exist (I've actually met one in my student nurse days, she tried going vegetarian and for some reason was unable to process all the nutrients she required from the diet and ended up hospitalized), and even if they are put on a good, balanced vegan diet, they do wither because their bodies literally can't handle it. They're okay to do so, right? Given their intent is not to kill and eat because they want to, but rather, have to? And I was not intending my previous statement to be rationalization, really, merely pointing out that regardless of what we consume, something still hurts. That's all. Only way to seriously stop that is to stop being here - hence the point of it all. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 11:15 am
i can see that you won't accept the idea that i am a loving person or that i respect life the way i do. you have a very obvious hatred of killing things, and refuse to believe in the sentience or soul of plantlife. i won't bother debating this any longer, i respectfully ask that we agree to disagree.
but i do need to say this. i don't eat meat just for enjoyment. i have been raised mostly vegetarian, with only poultry as a meat source. even then, i found i could not stomach most of it (i personally disliked the flavour, and my body seeme dto reject too much of it). i would get most of my protein from nuts and beans and spinach.
but living like that for 17 years was not healthy for me. i have a very rapid metabolism (or leastways i did, before i became anorexic). the food i ate was not enough for my body, but my appetite could not support the amounts i needed from a vegetarian diet. also, i have no driver's liscence, so i tend to have to walk everywhere, using alot of energy, and i also am a very busy and active man, rarely resting. lean meat like turkey or chicken is not enough for me, my body rejects most seafood, and i cannot get enough protein out of vegetables to support my cell-growth. i have been litterally deteriorating slowly my whole life. i only weigh 118 lbs, and i am losing between 2 and 10 pounds each month, depending on how much food i am able to find.
i have very little muscle, especialy in my upper body. i also am damn near fatless. i am lucky i am not diabetic. it's a ******** miracle in fact! i truely would be dead in a matter of months by this point if i havn't been eating the occaisional beef burger or steak in the past 3 years.
i have actually passed out from lack of nutrition before, on a number of occaisions. my sensitive pallet has made it hard for me to eat alot of the same types of food at a time, and this caused my stomach to shrink. my appetite followed, and i have been unable to even stomach enough food on a vegetarian diet to support myself. i became anorexic because of it, and that has only made the problem 10 times worse.
i truely cannot survive as a vegetarian. i want to live. and in order to do that, i need to eat meat. i feel compassion for the animals i kill, or that i buy already dead, and for the families they may have had, parents, mates, offspring... but i have loved ones as well who would be sad if i died. i have children i need to take care of. i can't do that if i let myself die so that some cow or dear or eel i have never been aquainted with can live.
in all thinsg there is a balance of life and death and rebirth. there is a food-chain, and an ecosystem. a perfect biorythm. in order to live, everything must kill. you can only have life by taking it from someone else. but the spirit lives on forever. we are all connected, and there is not a damn thing anyone can do to prevent the constant cycle of life, death and rebirth. i know it's rough, but it's the way of things. that's what life is.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 11:54 am
Chieftain Twilight i can see that you won't accept the idea that i am a loving person or that i respect life the way i do. you have a very obvious hatred of killing things, and refuse to believe in the sentience or soul of plantlife. i won't bother debating this any longer, i respectfully ask that we agree to disagree. I didn't say you weren't a loving person, now did I? Why must you view respect for all sentient life as "hatred of killing things"? There's no hatred at all, just deep concern over fellow beings causing themselves and others such incredible suffering needlessly. And again, if your idea of respect is killing something and using it as a commodity, please do NOT respect me. I don't refuse to believe in the sentience of plant life, I said see no evidence of it, and you've made no attempt to provide that evidence. Show me sentience in plants, I'll change my mind. When my father was in high school he was in an organization called Future Farmers of America (FFA) (he grew up on a farm that raised angus cattle). As a project for FFA, he raised a bull from a newborn calf and named it Gus. Come fall, he entered Gus in a show at the county fair. The young bull won a ribbon and was auctioned off. Several days later, as the family sat down to a steak dinner, my grandfather, jokingly, looked down at his plate and said "Poor old Gus.!" My father was crushed and heartbroken to realize that the animal he had lovingly raised had indeed probably been sold for slaughter and he burst into tears, leaving the table and mourning the loss of Gus. THAT's what love does, mourn the loss of what it cares about. Love does not rationalize killing and using something as somehow being respectful or loving. So as far as I am concerned, if you're not weeping every time you eat the flesh of a sentient being, then these notions of love, compassion, and respect you claim to have for the animal are nothing but self serving delusion. Love, compassion and respect do not use, harm or kill the the object of affection.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 11:59 am
I keep hearing about how at least some people simply must eat meat in order to survive. I challenge any one with this view to show me ONE vital nutrient in meat that cannot be found in a non meat source.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 12:13 pm
Byaggha And I was not intending my previous statement to be rationalization, really, merely pointing out that regardless of what we consume, something still hurts. That's all. Only way to seriously stop that is to stop being here - hence the point of it all. xd And the only way for anything, including the unintended victims of our consumption, to end their suffering is to deal with their own karma and achieve enlightenment. In other words, my existence may bring pain to others, intentionally or unintentionally, due to the vipakka of their karma, but my ceasing to exist will NOT cease their suffering.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 3:39 pm
davidm843 but my ceasing to exist will NOT cease their suffering. No, but it will cease you being a cause for some of it, which was all I was getting at. 3nodding And the 'vital nutrients not in meat' isn't the problem; for some reason, some folks just have an organic failure to thrive problem when put on a diet that does not have at least some meat in it. They can try to take in plant sources of said nutrients, and their bodies just don't process them properly. Even doctors are baffled as to why (the one treating the girl I was looking after literally had no answer for her as to why it was the case), but failure to thrive is like that - confusing, and often looks like it shouldn't be the case, but it is.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Alucard Ere Casanova
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 8:30 pm
davidm843 I stated elsewhere that vegetarianism is not requirement in Buddhadharma. But when one does things solely because they enjoy them, then they are feeding the cycle of craving that keeps them bound to samsara. I was raised on meat. My grandfather raised cattle, and I spent several years with him on his farm. He also hunted and fished, and some of my fondest memories of him are of us together fishing. However, there is NO nutrient in meat that cannot be found in a non meat food. Humans CAN eat and digest meat, but it is not a requirement for human existence, especially for those of us in the industrialized, developed world. I have been vegan for 20 years with no ill effect. My grandfather ate meat every day, usually 3 times a day, and still suffered the forms of anemia (both iron and B12 deficiencies) that I'm "supposed" to get from not eating animal products. Different folks, different strokes. I attempted to be vegetarian for awhile. Within a month I suffered from deprivation of iron and protein, I found no decent supplement. What many people fail to realize is that there are different types of protein and certain proteins can not be found in any non-meat substance, regardless of what "nutrition facts" may claim. Another thing to keep in mind is that there is a difference between desire and craving. If you eat meat because you desire it, you may be desiring it because your body knows that it needs it. However, if you eat meat because you crave it, then you are giving in to an addiction and that is entirely different. We should not deprive ourselves of things we enjoy unless we are enjoying them for the wrong reasons. Personally, I enjoy meat both for the flavor and the fact that I am getting the nutrients that my body requires. I enjoy it because I know I need it, not because I am addicted to it, but because for the sake of my health it is a requirement. There are many people like that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 9:13 pm
Master Shadow Kilo Another thing to keep in mind is that there is a difference between desire and craving. If you eat meat because you desire it, you may be desiring it because your body knows that it needs it. However, if you eat meat because you crave it, then you are giving in to an addiction and that is entirely different. We should not deprive ourselves of things we enjoy unless we are enjoying them for the wrong reasons. Personally, I enjoy meat both for the flavor and the fact that I am getting the nutrients that my body requires. I enjoy it because I know I need it, not because I am addicted to it, but because for the sake of my health it is a requirement. There are many people like that. From Paticcasamuppada - Dependent Origination (a core teaching of Buddhadharma) "...Dependent on feeling (which includes enjoyment and desire) arises craving. Dependent on craving arises clinging. Dependent on clinging arises becoming. Dependent on becoming arises birth. Dependent on birth arise aging and death and sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief and despair..." So you see, desire leads to craving, etc. What the human body does with protein is break it down into it's individual amino acids. It then uses those amino acids as needed. The bottom line is, once broken down, those amino acids are exactly the same, regardless of whether they came from a cheeseburger, a block of tofu, a bowl of beans and rice or a spoonful of chlorella, there is no chemical or structural difference. Many people experience a "detox" period right after ceasing eating meat. They may feel a bit tired for a few weeks, but it almost always passes once the body adjusts to to the new diet. But any one who has a B12 deficiency within a month of ceasing eating meat has some other health problem. B12 is simply not depleted from the body that fast in normal, health people. And eating meat really isn't addresing the problem, but merely treating the symptom.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Alucard Ere Casanova
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 5:41 pm
David, if that is the case, why bother trying to not crave things? Science has proven that our bodies will let us know by causing a desire/craving for what we need. If we need protein, we will crave eggs, peanut butter, meat, whatever we are used to getting it from. If we need vitamin C, we may crave oranges or other citrus. If we need potassium, we may crave bananas. Bottom line: if we need it, we will crave it.
I believe it is important to understand that there are differences and just because we desire something, it does not necessarily mean that we will crave it. There is a difference. Desire comes from a want or need. Craving comes from addiction. Addiction involves the belief that we need something when we don't need it, not just when we do(example: craving meat because you want it, not because you lack protein).
Again I say, "different folks, different strokes." What works for some will not work for all and it is not our place, as beings with limited knowledge and wisdom, to judge others for their choices.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 6:13 pm
Master Shadow Kilo David, if that is the case, why bother trying to not crave things? Science has proven that our bodies will let us know by causing a desire/craving for what we need. If we need protein, we will crave eggs, peanut butter, meat, whatever we are used to getting it from. If we need vitamin C, we may crave oranges or other citrus. If we need potassium, we may crave bananas. Bottom line: if we need it, we will crave it.I believe it is important to understand that there are differences and just because we desire something, it does not necessarily mean that we will crave it. There is a difference. Desire comes from a want or need. Craving comes from addiction. Addiction involves the belief that we need something when we don't need it, not just when we do(example: craving meat because you want it, not because you lack protein). Again I say, "different folks, different strokes." What works for some will not work for all and it is not our place, as beings with limited knowledge and wisdom, to judge others for their choices. People who have an addiction crave what they are addicted to. The Buddha taught that desire and craving are the reason for our suffering. So it's really simple, as long as one continues to be a slave to desire and craving, they will suffer. if one wishes to end their suffering, they must end desire and craving. Nothing judgmental about it, just the most basic teachings of the Buddha.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Alucard Ere Casanova
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 8:06 pm
But by that same statement it is said that we must end our needs, as it is our needs that we desire. Here is what I was taught, quoted.
"Attachment, or craving, and its full-blown cousin, addiction, are very different from simple desire. Attachment is a compulsion that screams, 'I must have what I desire if I am to be happy.' For example, if I simply desire an ice cream and get it, that's wonderful; if I don't get it, it is no big deal. But if I am attached to ice cream, I must have it or I suffer. Desire is simple wanting, attachment a compulsive necessity. Unfulfilled desires produce little impact; unfulfilled attachments yield frustration and pain."
So it is not that we should let go of all desire. I am sorry to be so blunt, but in my honest opinion such an attempt is very close, if not exactly, ignorance. That is exactly to say that we should ignore our bodies needs, because we will desire what we do need.
For example, food. A desire is just wanting. If you are hungry, you will want to eat. If you are hungry, you will desire food. This desire will not make you unhappy, it let's you know what your body is telling you- that you require nourishment and, as I think we all should know, without some kind of food we will eventually die. However, if we are attached to food, then it crosses the line of what we need to become what we are addicted to and in turn is consumed when it is not needed.
We should let go of attachment and addictions. We should not give in to cravings, by doing so we feed the addiction and by fighting it we can break the addiction. But we should listen to our desires because, although we may desire things we don't really need, we also desire what we do need. If we don't get what we do need(food, water, shelter) that will lead to suffering and, having been starved, dehydrated, and homeless myself, I can honestly tell everyone here that the lack of what we do need will indeed lead to suffering.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 9:26 pm
Master Shadow Kilo But by that same statement it is said that we must end our needs, as it is our needs that we desire. Here is what I was taught, quoted. "Attachment, or craving, and its full-blown cousin, addiction, are very different from simple desire. Attachment is a compulsion that screams, 'I must have what I desire if I am to be happy.' For example, if I simply desire an ice cream and get it, that's wonderful; if I don't get it, it is no big deal. But if I am attached to ice cream, I must have it or I suffer. Desire is simple wanting, attachment a compulsive necessity. Unfulfilled desires produce little impact; unfulfilled attachments yield frustration and pain." So it is not that we should let go of all desire. I am sorry to be so blunt, but in my honest opinion such an attempt is very close, if not exactly, ignorance. That is exactly to say that we should ignore our bodies needs, because we will desire what we do need. For example, food. A desire is just wanting. If you are hungry, you will want to eat. If you are hungry, you will desire food. This desire will not make you unhappy, it let's you know what your body is telling you- that you require nourishment and, as I think we all should know, without some kind of food we will eventually die. However, if we are attached to food, then it crosses the line of what we need to become what we are addicted to and in turn is consumed when it is not needed. We should let go of attachment and addictions. We should not give in to cravings, by doing so we feed the addiction and by fighting it we can break the addiction. But we should listen to our desires because, although we may desire things we don't really need, we also desire what we do need. If we don't get what we do need(food, water, shelter) that will lead to suffering and, having been starved, dehydrated, and homeless myself, I can honestly tell everyone here that the lack of what we do need will indeed lead to suffering. Who taught you THAT? May I suggest you take a very hard look at the teaching of Dependent Origination and the Four Noble Truths. Quite simply, desire leads to the very same attachment, cravings and addiction you say we should not give in to. If we keep giving in to desire, we keep feeding the source of craving and attachment, so how do you expect to be rid of it? Meeting the body's needs in regards to nourishment and it's other requirements needn't be an exercise in giving in to desire. The question is "Are you eating to live, or living to eat?" Two VERY different things. Most Zen centers begin formal meals with a gatha, beginning "72 Labors brought us this food, we should know how it comes to us." Might I suggest you get your teacher's version of the gatha, and recite and reflect on it prior to each meal. It really will change the way you look at food, eating, and your entire practice.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 9:31 pm
I eat animals.
I was raised to eat all things that I was given to not waste anything. When I was a child I also learned that being raised with that belief allowed me to get by on nothing but grits, jelly, the occasional bread loaf, and whatever was given to us by a food pantry or church when we could afford the distance. During this time i didn't care what i had to eat, as long as I had something. During this time I was literally almost homeless.
For example, if i only had fish or shellfish to eat compared to starving for a month or four, I would eat said animals.
Personally, I have never killed an animal to eat it. Personally, I don't believe it is correct to mass produce animals for said purpose.
I think an animal, when eaten, should be respected just as any fruit or vegetable. I am grateful that I have something to eat, be it a vegetable, fruit, or animal because it allows me to survive healthily.
When given the choice to eat it as when ordering from a menu, based on prices and how much I have with me to spend, I generally refuse.
unlike others, my reasoning for not being a vegetarian is this:
i like balanced diets, and although you get protein from nuts, and other sources, i will consume it if i have no other form of it, or if it will be wasted otherwise.
it is not simply the common answer along the lines of, "i like the taste too much, i cant survive without it"
answers like the one above sound like addictions to the taste, and i am not addicted to the flesh of other beings.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|