|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:29 pm
if God didn't want us to eat cows He wouldn't have made them big, fat and delicious.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:29 pm
PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm I'm surrounded by atheists and liberals here. Xp I had one Christian friend (of Norsk descent) and he was a blast to hang out with. Except I couldn't say damn, Christ or anything like that around him. i am neither liberal nor atheist. i am a taoist and an anarchist, which is actually a lot closer to conservatism than liberalism, though radically different than either. I like to consider myself a classical republican. I'm basically conservative about everything except morals and religion. Mainly because I believe in a higher powers. Slavonic pagan, I am. well then youd prolly understand better than some how anarchism is closer to conservatism than liberalism, since conservatives favor small states. out of that comes libertarianism, which favors a tiny state which will eventually wither away to nothing. and anarchists are just libertarians in a hurry, thinking that society exerts enough influence to keep people under control without anyauthoritarian state. of course, that just skims the philosophy that is anarchy, but i'm only trying to show how anarchy is closer to conservatism than liberalism's ideal of the expanded state Hm. That does make sense. I am not so much familiar with libertarianism, since politics has always been an interest of the spontaneous manner for me. well the essential difference between libertarianism and conservatism is that libertarianism has even more of an emphasis on the small state and on increased individual rights. and anarchism takes all that a step or 12 further
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:30 pm
Divinus Cruor if God didn't want us to eat cows He wouldn't have made them big, fat and delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:30 pm
MegaTherion777 Gravechylde MegaTherion777 Gravechylde MegaTherion777 jeez, i should get along with them better then. i like cows too. nothing beats a good steak rofl It just seems as though they forget that we are animals too, no better/worse than any of the other kinds. and that it's the natural order, and that we're a lot less cruel than lions in the wild.. oh yeah, and the fact that their very dental structure isnt designed to handle veggies only. we're meant to eat meat as well as veggies,and too much of one or the other is actually bad for us. veggies are too hard on the teeth, they wear them down too quickly, and meat is hard on the digestive system when taken in too large quantities. you need a balance. And what makes killing plants to eat them any better than killing animals to eat them? They're living creatures just like cows, chickens, and pigs, so why is killing one of these worse than killing a plant? What just because it doesn't squeal in pain it's ok to kill it? this is a very good point, and everytime a vegan talks about how cruel it i to kill cows, i always mention the untold physical and psychological pain they must bring upon the plant world by wiping out entire crops at once to feed themselves. Yeah, it really is nothing more than self-righteous nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:31 pm
Divinus Cruor if God didn't want us to eat cows He wouldn't have made them big, fat and delicious. Indeed, when I see a cow, I see a steak wrapped in a leather jacket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:33 pm
Digital Malevolence Divinus Cruor if God didn't want us to eat cows He wouldn't have made them big, fat and delicious. Indeed, when I see a cow, I see a steak wrapped in a leather jacket. yummy and stylish
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:36 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Divinus Cruor if God didn't want us to eat cows He wouldn't have made them big, fat and delicious. Indeed, when I see a cow, I see a steak wrapped in a leather jacket. yummy and stylish
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:39 pm
MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm I'm surrounded by atheists and liberals here. Xp I had one Christian friend (of Norsk descent) and he was a blast to hang out with. Except I couldn't say damn, Christ or anything like that around him. i am neither liberal nor atheist. i am a taoist and an anarchist, which is actually a lot closer to conservatism than liberalism, though radically different than either. I like to consider myself a classical republican. I'm basically conservative about everything except morals and religion. Mainly because I believe in a higher powers. Slavonic pagan, I am. well then youd prolly understand better than some how anarchism is closer to conservatism than liberalism, since conservatives favor small states. out of that comes libertarianism, which favors a tiny state which will eventually wither away to nothing. and anarchists are just libertarians in a hurry, thinking that society exerts enough influence to keep people under control without anyauthoritarian state. of course, that just skims the philosophy that is anarchy, but i'm only trying to show how anarchy is closer to conservatism than liberalism's ideal of the expanded state Hm. That does make sense. I am not so much familiar with libertarianism, since politics has always been an interest of the spontaneous manner for me. well the essential difference between libertarianism and conservatism is that libertarianism has even more of an emphasis on the small state and on increased individual rights. and anarchism takes all that a step or 12 further Ah. I see. Whenever I see the word anarchy, I think of Punk Music now stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:43 pm
PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm I like to consider myself a classical republican. I'm basically conservative about everything except morals and religion. Mainly because I believe in a higher powers. Slavonic pagan, I am. well then youd prolly understand better than some how anarchism is closer to conservatism than liberalism, since conservatives favor small states. out of that comes libertarianism, which favors a tiny state which will eventually wither away to nothing. and anarchists are just libertarians in a hurry, thinking that society exerts enough influence to keep people under control without anyauthoritarian state. of course, that just skims the philosophy that is anarchy, but i'm only trying to show how anarchy is closer to conservatism than liberalism's ideal of the expanded state Hm. That does make sense. I am not so much familiar with libertarianism, since politics has always been an interest of the spontaneous manner for me. well the essential difference between libertarianism and conservatism is that libertarianism has even more of an emphasis on the small state and on increased individual rights. and anarchism takes all that a step or 12 further Ah. I see. Whenever I see the word anarchy, I think of Punk Music now stressed at least you dont think "chaos" like so many people do. i cant explain it on a forum, but if you do some research you will find that anarchy is ORDER, not chaos. and people always seem to use it as a synonym of chaos. of course, if you dont do the research, you can just take my word for it. i'm a reliable source
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:43 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Divinus Cruor if God didn't want us to eat cows He wouldn't have made them big, fat and delicious. Indeed, when I see a cow, I see a steak wrapped in a leather jacket. yummy and stylish
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:45 pm
MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm I like to consider myself a classical republican. I'm basically conservative about everything except morals and religion. Mainly because I believe in a higher powers. Slavonic pagan, I am. well then youd prolly understand better than some how anarchism is closer to conservatism than liberalism, since conservatives favor small states. out of that comes libertarianism, which favors a tiny state which will eventually wither away to nothing. and anarchists are just libertarians in a hurry, thinking that society exerts enough influence to keep people under control without anyauthoritarian state. of course, that just skims the philosophy that is anarchy, but i'm only trying to show how anarchy is closer to conservatism than liberalism's ideal of the expanded state Hm. That does make sense. I am not so much familiar with libertarianism, since politics has always been an interest of the spontaneous manner for me. well the essential difference between libertarianism and conservatism is that libertarianism has even more of an emphasis on the small state and on increased individual rights. and anarchism takes all that a step or 12 further Ah. I see. Whenever I see the word anarchy, I think of Punk Music now stressed at least you dont think "chaos" like so many people do. i cant explain it on a forum, but if you do some research you will find that anarchy is ORDER, not chaos. and people always seem to use it as a synonym of chaos. of course, if you dont do the research, you can just take my word for it. i'm a reliable source Haha thanks 3nodding Most people here don't have much extensive knowledge of any political system. Dems and Reps for them. V for Vendetta is anarchy, Hitler facism, and Mao commie. So basic it's numbing stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:51 pm
PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm MegaTherion777 PandasRGr1mm Hm. That does make sense. I am not so much familiar with libertarianism, since politics has always been an interest of the spontaneous manner for me. well the essential difference between libertarianism and conservatism is that libertarianism has even more of an emphasis on the small state and on increased individual rights. and anarchism takes all that a step or 12 further Ah. I see. Whenever I see the word anarchy, I think of Punk Music now stressed at least you dont think "chaos" like so many people do. i cant explain it on a forum, but if you do some research you will find that anarchy is ORDER, not chaos. and people always seem to use it as a synonym of chaos. of course, if you dont do the research, you can just take my word for it. i'm a reliable source Haha thanks 3nodding Most people here don't have much extensive knowledge of any political system. Dems and Reps for them. V for Vendetta is anarchy, Hitler facism, and Mao commie. So basic it's numbing stressed indeed. although the comic of v for vendetta (not so much the movie xp ) makes for an interesting introduction to some of the ideas of anarchism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:56 pm
I read that comic during the hype about the movie before it came out. I can't remember much of what happened. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:59 pm
PandasRGr1mm I read that comic during the hype about the movie before it came out. I can't remember much of what happened. xp read it again. the comic was so much better than the movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
